[Dragonnade27] Wednesday, February 16, 2011 6:17:14 PM
Its okay. A couple of good songs... yeah thats about it. Edited at: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 6:17:33 PM
[K2M] Wednesday, February 16, 2011 1:29:42 PM
I havent heard anything from the Terbo album.
[GREXUMER] Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:06:52 PM
I love Turbo's album, but I haven't heard about an album called "Terbo"... what is it?! xD
hahaha I'm just kiddin'
[heykyleinsf] Wednesday, February 16, 2011 2:48:31 AM
Unfairly criticized.
Locked in is one of my favorite songs,
and possibly the band's best video.
I love Reckless, and Out in the cold
But I do think Parental guidance and
private property are weak for JP standards.
[The Hellion237748] Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:32:39 AM
how can you not like you say yes?
i listen to that whole album all the time in english instead of listening to the teacher
it s a great album!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Thursday, December 31, 2009 9:38:19 PM)
spapad wrote:
Well thank god, parental guidance did not come out on P.O.E.! Yeh, your right, I do tend to skip over the ones you mentioned althoug sometimes I like them except, troubleshooter and the ever annoying you say yes. I still love P.O.E. way over turbo. Give me the opening sound of Solar Angels! Iove that song! I love all the ones you mentioned but troubleshooter and you say yes should have hit the cutting floor. Oh god, how did I forget that one? lol
Now, Don't go is a fav of mine for the video! I love it!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Yes spapad I agree,I still tried to listen to it when it came out but I was only able to listen to Out In The Cold,Wild Nights and Reckless.The other 6 tracks I couldn't get into.The entire side one all 5 songs are terrible to me(sorry Guido!lol!).
Point Of Entry is not that bad of an album.10 tracks on it and to me I think 6 songs are cool Priest tracks:
Heading Out To The Highway
Hot Rockin'
Turning Circles
Desert Plains
Solar Angels
On The Run
Those 6 tracks to me are Point Of Entry's best.Then you have "All The Way" thats "okish sometimes" ......"Trouble Shooter" I do not like,"You Say Yes" I don't like either and "Don't Go" I absolutely HATE! lol!
But I can still get 6 tracks off of Point Of Entry that are good Judas Priest songs in my book,I agree with you on Point Of Entry. I Think "Parental Guidance" is the worst song ever written by Judas Priest.
And they even made a video out of it back then which was even worse! "Private Property" is Judas Priest's second worse song ever written.
(Quoting Message by spapad from Thursday, December 31, 2009 6:35:25 PM)
spapad wrote:
J.D. The first time I heard Turbo (not terbo) I also almost lost faith! I continued to listen to it and some of the songs grew on me, but as a whole it was dissapointing to most of the JP fans. We find things we like in it, but the album as a whole is weak, and well below JP's standards. It stands the test of time more for fans who enjoy pop metal. Point of Entry was a crapshoot for some, but I love it! OK there is one song I would cut out of it if I could, but it still sounds good to me to this day! Turbo is a once a year listen at best to me.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Dale,I know that Rob is the most important singers in metal,I've been a true fan since 1981 so I'm guessing I've been a fan much longer than you,so I'm agreeing with you.I just think that the Turbo album is not "heavy". Its "weak" to me.
The songs on Turbo are not quality tracks in my opinion but I get it that lots of people enjoy this album and think these tracks are quality,its all a person's opinion. I have no say as to who should like it or who shouldn't I'm just saying that I can never understand what people like in the album,its soft,weak and embarrassing for me,its way too much over the top commercialism,but to each his own....I'm glad you like it,hows that? lol!
(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:25:35 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
Yeah, no offense but who cares about what someone thought 23 years ago? I agree that the Turbo album really had some stuff that was different for Priest but its still heavy all the same. Rob Halford is just incredible on this album and he is one of the most important singers in metal. Judas Preist are the best because of their BIG varation of songs and Turbo is a perfect example of how diverse the Priest discography is.
Ram It Down? True Speed Metal to my ears! Contains the best guiatr solo battle in the history of metal !!
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:10 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
First off I agree with Jimmy James. Second,you said about Turbo: "This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound." But they "did compromise thier sound" Dale,and they compromised it "big time'.
23 years ago when this album was released I even remember back then countless long time fans were totally bummed out because Turbo robbed Priest's volcanic sound and robbed the band of its trademark sound,so I have no clue as to how you think the Turbo album didn't compromise thier sound,its beyond me.If you like the album,thats cool but to say it didn't effect thier original sound and style is ludichrist. The Ram It Down album still wasn't back to Priest's trademark sound but a couple of tracks were headed in the right direction such as the title track Ram It Down and the second track "Heavy Metal".(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:49:55 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
(Quoting Message by FreakyMetalHead from Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM)
FreakyMetalHead wrote:
Edited at: Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:10:48 PM
[The Hellion237748] Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:29:35 AM
its ok i asked my nanna for it for christmas 2008 and she actually bought it for me
[the highway terror] Thursday, December 23, 2010 5:14:08 PM
I loved it from day one . the live album culled from the turbo tour is a good one too
[paorcamp] Thursday, July 29, 2010 9:48:35 AM
it's not the best album...not even one I like to listen to...but it's not that bad either...there may be two or three songs I like a lot...
[Zomby] Thursday, July 29, 2010 9:38:41 AM
good tune have you seen the video bikers and skeletons
[*DemonCat*] Thursday, July 29, 2010 6:10:55 AM
I've always loved the Turbo album. I introduced my wife to Priest with it, and Locked in is "our song". Married for 22 years...we are definately "locked in".
[metallo] Friday, July 23, 2010 5:58:35 AM
It's not classical Priest album, but at last, if you are open minded, it's a good rock album. So I like it. Maybe because is made by Priest, but I'm not so negative with it.
[hellrider 31038] Friday, January 22, 2010 6:39:05 PM
personally i like the turbo album it has quite a bit of energy.i do not really consider it a metal album though more of a rock album like zz top or whatever.i enjoy the album but would never want to see THE PRIEST go this direction again
[Budred] Thursday, January 21, 2010 7:03:04 AM
I like a few of the songs but overall I thought it was the weakest Priest album until Nostradamus.
[blackshadow] Thursday, January 07, 2010 7:31:16 AM
I'm listening to the Turbo Album at the moment on my ipod. I love it. Have for a while.
[jimmyjames] Monday, January 04, 2010 3:41:42 AM
[This message has been banned]
[Phantom A6] Sunday, January 03, 2010 6:14:38 AM
"Turbo"?? Great stuff!! One of the best albums ever!!
"Terbo"?? Ha!!
[spapad] Thursday, December 31, 2009 9:38:19 PM
Well thank god, parental guidance did not come out on P.O.E.! Yeh, your right, I do tend to skip over the ones you mentioned althoug sometimes I like them except, troubleshooter and the ever annoying you say yes. I still love P.O.E. way over turbo. Give me the opening sound of Solar Angels! Iove that song! I love all the ones you mentioned but troubleshooter and you say yes should have hit the cutting floor. Oh god, how did I forget that one? lol
Now, Don't go is a fav of mine for the video! I love it!
Yes spapad I agree,I still tried to listen to it when it came out but I was only able to listen to Out In The Cold,Wild Nights and Reckless.The other 6 tracks I couldn't get into.The entire side one all 5 songs are terrible to me(sorry Guido!lol!).
Point Of Entry is not that bad of an album.10 tracks on it and to me I think 6 songs are cool Priest tracks:
Heading Out To The Highway
Hot Rockin'
Turning Circles
Desert Plains
Solar Angels
On The Run
Those 6 tracks to me are Point Of Entry's best.Then you have "All The Way" thats "okish sometimes" ......"Trouble Shooter" I do not like,"You Say Yes" I don't like either and "Don't Go" I absolutely HATE! lol!
But I can still get 6 tracks off of Point Of Entry that are good Judas Priest songs in my book,I agree with you on Point Of Entry. I Think "Parental Guidance" is the worst song ever written by Judas Priest.
And they even made a video out of it back then which was even worse! "Private Property" is Judas Priest's second worse song ever written.
(Quoting Message by spapad from Thursday, December 31, 2009 6:35:25 PM)
spapad wrote:
J.D. The first time I heard Turbo (not terbo) I also almost lost faith! I continued to listen to it and some of the songs grew on me, but as a whole it was dissapointing to most of the JP fans. We find things we like in it, but the album as a whole is weak, and well below JP's standards. It stands the test of time more for fans who enjoy pop metal. Point of Entry was a crapshoot for some, but I love it! OK there is one song I would cut out of it if I could, but it still sounds good to me to this day! Turbo is a once a year listen at best to me.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Dale,I know that Rob is the most important singers in metal,I've been a true fan since 1981 so I'm guessing I've been a fan much longer than you,so I'm agreeing with you.I just think that the Turbo album is not "heavy". Its "weak" to me.
The songs on Turbo are not quality tracks in my opinion but I get it that lots of people enjoy this album and think these tracks are quality,its all a person's opinion. I have no say as to who should like it or who shouldn't I'm just saying that I can never understand what people like in the album,its soft,weak and embarrassing for me,its way too much over the top commercialism,but to each his own....I'm glad you like it,hows that? lol!
(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:25:35 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
Yeah, no offense but who cares about what someone thought 23 years ago? I agree that the Turbo album really had some stuff that was different for Priest but its still heavy all the same. Rob Halford is just incredible on this album and he is one of the most important singers in metal. Judas Preist are the best because of their BIG varation of songs and Turbo is a perfect example of how diverse the Priest discography is.
Ram It Down? True Speed Metal to my ears! Contains the best guiatr solo battle in the history of metal !!
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:10 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
First off I agree with Jimmy James. Second,you said about Turbo: "This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound." But they "did compromise thier sound" Dale,and they compromised it "big time'.
23 years ago when this album was released I even remember back then countless long time fans were totally bummed out because Turbo robbed Priest's volcanic sound and robbed the band of its trademark sound,so I have no clue as to how you think the Turbo album didn't compromise thier sound,its beyond me.If you like the album,thats cool but to say it didn't effect thier original sound and style is ludichrist. The Ram It Down album still wasn't back to Priest's trademark sound but a couple of tracks were headed in the right direction such as the title track Ram It Down and the second track "Heavy Metal".(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:49:55 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
(Quoting Message by FreakyMetalHead from Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM)
FreakyMetalHead wrote:
Edited at: Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:10:48 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:10:19 PM
Yes spapad I agree,I still tried to listen to it when it came out but I was only able to listen to Out In The Cold,Wild Nights and Reckless.The other 6 tracks I couldn't get into.The entire side one all 5 songs are terrible to me(sorry Guido!lol!).
Point Of Entry is not that bad of an album.10 tracks on it and to me I think 6 songs are cool Priest tracks:
Heading Out To The Highway
Hot Rockin'
Turning Circles
Desert Plains
Solar Angels
On The Run
Those 6 tracks to me are Point Of Entry's best.Then you have "All The Way" thats "okish sometimes" ......"Trouble Shooter" I do not like,"You Say Yes" I don't like either and "Don't Go" I absolutely HATE! lol!
But I can still get 6 tracks off of Point Of Entry that are good Judas Priest songs in my book,I agree with you on Point Of Entry. I Think "Parental Guidance" is the worst song ever written by Judas Priest.
And they even made a video out of it back then which was even worse! "Private Property" is Judas Priest's second worse song ever written.
J.D. The first time I heard Turbo (not terbo) I also almost lost faith! I continued to listen to it and some of the songs grew on me, but as a whole it was dissapointing to most of the JP fans. We find things we like in it, but the album as a whole is weak, and well below JP's standards. It stands the test of time more for fans who enjoy pop metal. Point of Entry was a crapshoot for some, but I love it! OK there is one song I would cut out of it if I could, but it still sounds good to me to this day! Turbo is a once a year listen at best to me.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Dale,I know that Rob is the most important singers in metal,I've been a true fan since 1981 so I'm guessing I've been a fan much longer than you,so I'm agreeing with you.I just think that the Turbo album is not "heavy". Its "weak" to me.
The songs on Turbo are not quality tracks in my opinion but I get it that lots of people enjoy this album and think these tracks are quality,its all a person's opinion. I have no say as to who should like it or who shouldn't I'm just saying that I can never understand what people like in the album,its soft,weak and embarrassing for me,its way too much over the top commercialism,but to each his own....I'm glad you like it,hows that? lol!
(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:25:35 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
Yeah, no offense but who cares about what someone thought 23 years ago? I agree that the Turbo album really had some stuff that was different for Priest but its still heavy all the same. Rob Halford is just incredible on this album and he is one of the most important singers in metal. Judas Preist are the best because of their BIG varation of songs and Turbo is a perfect example of how diverse the Priest discography is.
Ram It Down? True Speed Metal to my ears! Contains the best guiatr solo battle in the history of metal !!
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:10 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
First off I agree with Jimmy James. Second,you said about Turbo: "This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound." But they "did compromise thier sound" Dale,and they compromised it "big time'.
23 years ago when this album was released I even remember back then countless long time fans were totally bummed out because Turbo robbed Priest's volcanic sound and robbed the band of its trademark sound,so I have no clue as to how you think the Turbo album didn't compromise thier sound,its beyond me.If you like the album,thats cool but to say it didn't effect thier original sound and style is ludichrist. The Ram It Down album still wasn't back to Priest's trademark sound but a couple of tracks were headed in the right direction such as the title track Ram It Down and the second track "Heavy Metal".(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:49:55 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
(Quoting Message by FreakyMetalHead from Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM)
FreakyMetalHead wrote:
Edited at: Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:10:48 PM
[spapad] Thursday, December 31, 2009 6:35:25 PM
J.D. The first time I heard Turbo (not terbo) I also almost lost faith! I continued to listen to it and some of the songs grew on me, but as a whole it was dissapointing to most of the JP fans. We find things we like in it, but the album as a whole is weak, and well below JP's standards. It stands the test of time more for fans who enjoy pop metal. Point of Entry was a crapshoot for some, but I love it! OK there is one song I would cut out of it if I could, but it still sounds good to me to this day! Turbo is a once a year listen at best to me. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Thursday, December 31, 2009 2:31:44 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Dale,I know that Rob is the most important singers in metal,I've been a true fan since 1981 so I'm guessing I've been a fan much longer than you,so I'm agreeing with you.I just think that the Turbo album is not "heavy". Its "weak" to me.
The songs on Turbo are not quality tracks in my opinion but I get it that lots of people enjoy this album and think these tracks are quality,its all a person's opinion. I have no say as to who should like it or who shouldn't I'm just saying that I can never understand what people like in the album,its soft,weak and embarrassing for me,its way too much over the top commercialism,but to each his own....I'm glad you like it,hows that? lol!
(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:25:35 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
Yeah, no offense but who cares about what someone thought 23 years ago? I agree that the Turbo album really had some stuff that was different for Priest but its still heavy all the same. Rob Halford is just incredible on this album and he is one of the most important singers in metal. Judas Preist are the best because of their BIG varation of songs and Turbo is a perfect example of how diverse the Priest discography is.
Ram It Down? True Speed Metal to my ears! Contains the best guiatr solo battle in the history of metal !!
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:10 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
First off I agree with Jimmy James. Second,you said about Turbo: "This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound." But they "did compromise thier sound" Dale,and they compromised it "big time'.
23 years ago when this album was released I even remember back then countless long time fans were totally bummed out because Turbo robbed Priest's volcanic sound and robbed the band of its trademark sound,so I have no clue as to how you think the Turbo album didn't compromise thier sound,its beyond me.If you like the album,thats cool but to say it didn't effect thier original sound and style is ludichrist. The Ram It Down album still wasn't back to Priest's trademark sound but a couple of tracks were headed in the right direction such as the title track Ram It Down and the second track "Heavy Metal".(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:49:55 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
(Quoting Message by FreakyMetalHead from Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM)
FreakyMetalHead wrote:
Edited at: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:46 AM
Edited at: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:25:53 PM
Edited at: Thursday, December 31, 2009 2:32:03 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Thursday, December 31, 2009 2:31:44 PM
Dale,I know that Rob is the most important singers in metal,I've been a true fan since 1981 so I'm guessing I've been a fan much longer than you,so I'm agreeing with you.I just think that the Turbo album is not "heavy". Its "weak" to me.
The songs on Turbo are not quality tracks in my opinion but I get it that lots of people enjoy this album and think these tracks are quality,its all a person's opinion. I have no say as to who should like it or who shouldn't I'm just saying that I can never understand what people like in the album,its soft,weak and embarrassing for me,its way too much over the top commercialism,but to each his own....I'm glad you like it,hows that? lol!
Yeah, no offense but who cares about what someone thought 23 years ago? I agree that the Turbo album really had some stuff that was different for Priest but its still heavy all the same. Rob Halford is just incredible on this album and he is one of the most important singers in metal. Judas Preist are the best because of their BIG varation of songs and Turbo is a perfect example of how diverse the Priest discography is.
Ram It Down? True Speed Metal to my ears! Contains the best guiatr solo battle in the history of metal !!
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:10 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
First off I agree with Jimmy James. Second,you said about Turbo: "This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound." But they "did compromise thier sound" Dale,and they compromised it "big time'.
23 years ago when this album was released I even remember back then countless long time fans were totally bummed out because Turbo robbed Priest's volcanic sound and robbed the band of its trademark sound,so I have no clue as to how you think the Turbo album didn't compromise thier sound,its beyond me.If you like the album,thats cool but to say it didn't effect thier original sound and style is ludichrist. The Ram It Down album still wasn't back to Priest's trademark sound but a couple of tracks were headed in the right direction such as the title track Ram It Down and the second track "Heavy Metal".(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:49:55 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
(Quoting Message by FreakyMetalHead from Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM)
FreakyMetalHead wrote:
Edited at: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:46 AM
Edited at: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:25:53 PM
Edited at: Thursday, December 31, 2009 2:32:03 PM
[Dale T.] Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:25:35 PM
Yeah, no offense but who cares about what someone thought 23 years ago? I agree that the Turbo album really had some stuff that was different for Priest but its still heavy all the same. Rob Halford is just incredible on this album and he is one of the most important singers in metal. Judas Preist are the best because of their BIG varation of songs and Turbo is a perfect example of how diverse the Priest discography is.
Ram It Down? True Speed Metal to my ears! Contains the best guiatr solo battle in the history of metal !!
First off I agree with Jimmy James. Second,you said about Turbo: "This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound." But they "did compromise thier sound" Dale,and they compromised it "big time'.
23 years ago when this album was released I even remember back then countless long time fans were totally bummed out because Turbo robbed Priest's volcanic sound and robbed the band of its trademark sound,so I have no clue as to how you think the Turbo album didn't compromise thier sound,its beyond me.If you like the album,thats cool but to say it didn't effect thier original sound and style is ludichrist. The Ram It Down album still wasn't back to Priest's trademark sound but a couple of tracks were headed in the right direction such as the title track Ram It Down and the second track "Heavy Metal".(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:49:55 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
(Quoting Message by FreakyMetalHead from Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM)
FreakyMetalHead wrote:
Edited at: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:46 AM
Edited at: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:25:53 PM
[Head banger] Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:27:55 PM
but what is their sound? play freewheel burning to someone who knows only painkiller (yes they exist) and they will ID it as "early priest" play that same dude white heat red hot and they have no idea.
the 70's stuff shows a progression, similar style, growing out of a blues based rock style
then bs more straight up hard rock
POE moves towards prog
SFV straight heavy metal
dotf a darker metal
.
.
.
compare to maiden. every album instantly recognizable. the casual fan might not know which album which song goes with but you know its maiden. the only real constant with priest is Rob, and he was gone for 2 albums. glenn and KK change their styles and sound, Ian is consistant, and they have had more drummers than a cd changer in a bar has seen disks. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:10 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
First off I agree with Jimmy James. Second,you said about Turbo: "This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound." But they "did compromise thier sound" Dale,and they compromised it "big time'.
23 years ago when this album was released I even remember back then countless long time fans were totally bummed out because Turbo robbed Priest's volcanic sound and robbed the band of its trademark sound,so I have no clue as to how you think the Turbo album didn't compromise thier sound,its beyond me.If you like the album,thats cool but to say it didn't effect thier original sound and style is ludichrist. The Ram It Down album still wasn't back to Priest's trademark sound but a couple of tracks were headed in the right direction such as the title track Ram It Down and the second track "Heavy Metal".(Quoting Message by Dale T. from Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:49:55 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
(Quoting Message by FreakyMetalHead from Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM)
FreakyMetalHead wrote:
Edited at: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:46 AM
[Skybreaker] Wednesday, December 30, 2009 10:58:58 AM
Its kind of funny but I find myself listening to Turbo more than Nostradamus. I don't know but its just kind of fun to listen to. I know they sold out on it and everything and its cheesy but it is Judas Priest. Nostradamus is just the opposite, too long and drawn out and just gets boaring after a while. If I had to choose one of the two as the only Priest cd I had it would be Turbo. So thats what I think about Turbo.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:10 AM
First off I agree with Jimmy James. Second,you said about Turbo: "This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound." But they "did compromise thier sound" Dale,and they compromised it "big time'.
23 years ago when this album was released I even remember back then countless long time fans were totally bummed out because Turbo robbed Priest's volcanic sound and robbed the band of its trademark sound,so I have no clue as to how you think the Turbo album didn't compromise thier sound,its beyond me.If you like the album,thats cool but to say it didn't effect thier original sound and style is ludichrist. The Ram It Down album still wasn't back to Priest's trademark sound but a couple of tracks were headed in the right direction such as the title track Ram It Down and the second track "Heavy Metal".[Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Dale T. from Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:49:55 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
(Quoting Message by FreakyMetalHead from Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM)
FreakyMetalHead wrote:
Edited at: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:34:46 AM
[jimmyjames] Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:58:29 AM
Maybe Hall Of Fame for Best Tunes To CRANK While Driving Around Looking Like A Goon.
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
(Quoting Message by FreakyMetalHead from Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM)
FreakyMetalHead wrote:
Edited at: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:55:16 PM
[Dale T.] Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:49:55 PM
This showed Priest's ability to write a good hook, without compromising their sound. Definitely not something you would have heard on the first couple records.This Album WILL go into The Heavy Metal Hall Of Fame,for Best tunes to CRANK while driving around!
[J.D. DIAMOND] Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4:28:41 PM
Shitty record,and "ballsy on thier part"? Yes. Is it "smart" for them to experiment on one album and not put out another record for 3 long years? No. I HATE it when bands "experiment". Fuck the "likers". [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by iamnostradamus88 from Saturday, December 26, 2009 11:51:58 PM)
iamnostradamus88 wrote:
I think turbo is a solid record. Songs like Locked In, Out In The Cold and Rock You All Around the World are hard to dislike in my opinion. I love when bands experiment. Its really ballsy on there part. Cool record. Fuck the haters.
[iamnostradamus88] Saturday, December 26, 2009 11:51:58 PM
I think turbo is a solid record. Songs like Locked In, Out In The Cold and Rock You All Around the World are hard to dislike in my opinion. I love when bands experiment. Its really ballsy on there part. Cool record. Fuck the haters.
[FreakyMetalHead] Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:54:35 PM
[artistny] Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:16:19 PM
Turbo was a killa tour i was there awsome cd
[FreakyMetalHead] Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:10:31 PM
"terbo"
[Brandon Taylor] Saturday, December 26, 2009 11:51:55 AM
wow i didnt now my treat would creeate such a buz
[Head banger] Saturday, December 26, 2009 10:14:41 AM
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[Vaillant 3.0] Friday, December 25, 2009 11:54:06 PM
I like "terbo". Parental Guidance makes me laugh.
In the Electric Eye DVD, they have the Locked In video appear first before the Turbo Lover one. Shouldn't it be the other way around? Hmmm... Edited at: Friday, December 25, 2009 11:54:26 PM
[Becks] Friday, December 25, 2009 1:31:09 AM
Out In The Cold is my favourite song on Turbo, which is an album I enjoy if I am in the right mood, you shoudl definitely do that song Freeze!
We were driving around cranking Painkiller today, kicks ass, but yeah, from what I've heard recently, Rob struggles with it. Which when you listen to it, is understandable, hell I wouldn't be able to replicate that LOL! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:01:54 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it.
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:25:25 PM
And on THAT note, I will take my leave! A most wonderful Christmas to you guys!!!! I must get into bed before Santa shows up with my new copy of "terbo"........HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:18:24 PM
BWWWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:16:47 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
It sounds like someone torturing a peacock with a blowtorch.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I hate to keep saying this so everyone can read it but...I really do NOT like the way Rob does PK these days. It sounds just awful.
jimmyjames wrote:
I can imagine. I'm sure Halford doesn't enjoy doing it too much any more. It's insanely high and loud and screamy.
Deep Freeze wrote:
Oh man!!! I have never tried SFV but, as I have mentioned, Painkiller was BRUUUUUUTAL! Hardest song I have ever tried! And the Princess could even hear me at the other end of the house!!! THAT is saying something because she can never hear me when I record!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
It's probably less stressful on the voice too. As compared to the screaming on say Painkiller or Screaming For Vengeance.
Deep Freeze wrote:
That's not a bad suggestion. I have been asked several times about what song we should try to cover and OITC is a GREAT idea!!
jimmyjames wrote:
Do it for the opening song on the next cd with your covers band. Always felt it was wasted as track 6.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it.
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:16:47 PM
It sounds like someone torturing a peacock with a blowtorch. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:15:27 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
I hate to keep saying this so everyone can read it but...I really do NOT like the way Rob does PK these days. It sounds just awful.
jimmyjames wrote:
I can imagine. I'm sure Halford doesn't enjoy doing it too much any more. It's insanely high and loud and screamy.
Deep Freeze wrote:
Oh man!!! I have never tried SFV but, as I have mentioned, Painkiller was BRUUUUUUTAL! Hardest song I have ever tried! And the Princess could even hear me at the other end of the house!!! THAT is saying something because she can never hear me when I record!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
It's probably less stressful on the voice too. As compared to the screaming on say Painkiller or Screaming For Vengeance.
Deep Freeze wrote:
That's not a bad suggestion. I have been asked several times about what song we should try to cover and OITC is a GREAT idea!!
jimmyjames wrote:
Do it for the opening song on the next cd with your covers band. Always felt it was wasted as track 6.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it.
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:15:27 PM
I hate to keep saying this so everyone can read it but...I really do NOT like the way Rob does PK these days. It sounds just awful. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:13:52 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I can imagine. I'm sure Halford doesn't enjoy doing it too much any more. It's insanely high and loud and screamy.
Deep Freeze wrote:
Oh man!!! I have never tried SFV but, as I have mentioned, Painkiller was BRUUUUUUTAL! Hardest song I have ever tried! And the Princess could even hear me at the other end of the house!!! THAT is saying something because she can never hear me when I record!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
It's probably less stressful on the voice too. As compared to the screaming on say Painkiller or Screaming For Vengeance.
Deep Freeze wrote:
That's not a bad suggestion. I have been asked several times about what song we should try to cover and OITC is a GREAT idea!!
jimmyjames wrote:
Do it for the opening song on the next cd with your covers band. Always felt it was wasted as track 6.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it.
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:13:52 PM
I can imagine. I'm sure Halford doesn't enjoy doing it too much any more. It's insanely high and loud and screamy. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:11:17 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
Oh man!!! I have never tried SFV but, as I have mentioned, Painkiller was BRUUUUUUTAL! Hardest song I have ever tried! And the Princess could even hear me at the other end of the house!!! THAT is saying something because she can never hear me when I record!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
It's probably less stressful on the voice too. As compared to the screaming on say Painkiller or Screaming For Vengeance.
Deep Freeze wrote:
That's not a bad suggestion. I have been asked several times about what song we should try to cover and OITC is a GREAT idea!!
jimmyjames wrote:
Do it for the opening song on the next cd with your covers band. Always felt it was wasted as track 6.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it.
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:11:17 PM
Oh man!!! I have never tried SFV but, as I have mentioned, Painkiller was BRUUUUUUTAL! Hardest song I have ever tried! And the Princess could even hear me at the other end of the house!!! THAT is saying something because she can never hear me when I record!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:09:14 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
It's probably less stressful on the voice too. As compared to the screaming on say Painkiller or Screaming For Vengeance.
Deep Freeze wrote:
That's not a bad suggestion. I have been asked several times about what song we should try to cover and OITC is a GREAT idea!!
jimmyjames wrote:
Do it for the opening song on the next cd with your covers band. Always felt it was wasted as track 6.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it.
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:09:14 PM
It's probably less stressful on the voice too. As compared to the screaming on say Painkiller or Screaming For Vengeance. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:05:52 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
That's not a bad suggestion. I have been asked several times about what song we should try to cover and OITC is a GREAT idea!!
jimmyjames wrote:
Do it for the opening song on the next cd with your covers band. Always felt it was wasted as track 6.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it.
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:05:52 PM
That's not a bad suggestion. I have been asked several times about what song we should try to cover and OITC is a GREAT idea!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:04:06 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
Do it for the opening song on the next cd with your covers band. Always felt it was wasted as track 6.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it.
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:04:06 PM
Do it for the opening song on the next cd with your covers band. Always felt it was wasted as track 6. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:01:54 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it.
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:01:54 PM
I agree. Out in the Cold rocks. We actually considered putting it on the CD but we never got around to doing it. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:59:37 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener.
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:59:37 PM
I was talking about those girls blouse wearing Bee Gees.
I actually think that Out In The Cold is a great song. Much better than Prophecy as a show opener. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:53:44 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:53:58 PM
Ah thank you, sir.I am grateful to be home. It is always chaotic over there and there are far too many people! Its madness. Nice to be back "in the bubble". The Princess had a little too much "Christmas cheer" and is in a giggly mood....I think we are in for a short Christmas Eve...HA!!!!!!!!!!!
[guidogodoy] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:53:44 PM
You know you are only fueling the fire with such a comment. HAAAAAA!!!
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:50:45 PM
Thanks Freeze, all the best to you too. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:47:06 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
Ah!! Well then, a VERY Merry Christmas to you, my friend! We are still a few hours away. Just walked in from a Christmas Eve at the duchess and doges' house. I am full and tired as well!!!! HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
Yup. Time is 17.43. Xmas day, I'm stuffed and trying not to fall asleep.
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:48:34 PM
HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You tell 'em, GEEEEEEEDO!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:45:47 PM)
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:47:06 PM
Ah!! Well then, a VERY Merry Christmas to you, my friend! We are still a few hours away. Just walked in from a Christmas Eve at the duchess and doges' house. I am full and tired as well!!!! HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:43:58 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
Yup. Time is 17.43. Xmas day, I'm stuffed and trying not to fall asleep.
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[guidogodoy] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:45:47 PM
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:43:58 PM
Yup. Time is 17.43. Xmas day, I'm stuffed and trying not to fall asleep. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:40:12 PM)
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:40:12 PM
Is it already Christmas Day there, jj?? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:38:06 PM)
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:38:09 PM
I thought we were going to talk about "terbo"........HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:38:06 PM
Evening Freeze, how are you today? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:35:29 PM)
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[guidogodoy] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:37:35 PM
Nah, we weren't talking about the Bee Gees. LOL!! (you know I love 'em)
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:35:29 PM
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:34:35 PM
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:32:37 PM
What?!??!?!?!???? Someone call me???? HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:29:59 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd.
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:29:59 PM
Yeah!!! What the fuck was that? They only did that to appeal to that 1950's rocker type crowd. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:25:54 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!!
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[guidogodoy] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:25:54 PM
I am with you there! Let's talk about Johnny B. Goode! LOL!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:20:07 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit.
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:20:07 PM
I understand that. I'm sure people on the Rolling Stones site are still discussing songs that are 45+ years old. However with Turbo it's always the same old arguments rehashed. What were they thinking? Parental Guidance is a shocker etc. I'd be happy to discuss Island Of Domination for a change instead of this Turbo sellout shit. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:14:48 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[guidogodoy] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:14:48 PM
I disagree. This song is from '75 and I argue it still has merit for JP.Com [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:10:11 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[jimmyjames] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:10:11 PM
I think Turbo's 25 years old. Who fucking cares? Why are we talking about something that happened a quarter of a century ago. Lets talk about some more up to date stuff, like the first Gulf War, Frank Sinatras death, the Berlin Wall coming down etc.
[guidogodoy] Thursday, December 24, 2009 8:30:21 PM
ps. Center Grand River across from campus by Flat, black and circular / Peanut Barrel was a store that was probably already gone by the time you arrived. Called "The Man Alive." Anyway, State Discount was on the corner right next to it and all the army / navy and a haircutting place (Public Hair...heh) a travel agency (remember the clock on the outside wall?) and MY store were above it 503 1/2. It was a futon store called...well....the Futon Store! I ran it for five years paying my way through college. Any of this ring a bell?
BTW. I was in EL last year on a road trip and we bartered our way down to the Landshark to just have a bowl. Can you believe that not one person knew what one was?!? They dredged up an old dishwasher or something who made us a shot of something close but no gummie sharks or anything!!
Boy, it sucks to get old. We still had a few each. Edited at: Thursday, December 24, 2009 8:31:43 PM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, December 24, 2009 8:21:30 PM
I was in Rather (Brody). You must have been one of those Akers types! LOL!!!
We certainly did bump into one another somewhere / someplace. I'll flip back through some of my Junior year Capitol Villa year parties. Wouldn't surprise me if I see you in my pool! HAAAAA!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS from Thursday, December 24, 2009 5:38:51 PM)
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
Geez Guido, I'm beginning to think that you have been "stalking" me for a very long time! Or maybe it's the other way around?Hmmmm, I graduated in '88 so you were at MSU for a little while when I was there too? So I guess I've been following YOU around! Can't believe we never ran into each other before this. Damn, we could have had a whole lotta fun! I could have used someone to keep up with me drinking those shark bowls
I hope you and your family have a wonderful Christmas and a GREAT New Year!
guidogodoy wrote:
Well, why didn't you come over and say hello?!? LOL.
Wasn't at '83. I graduated HS in '86.
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Thursday, December 24, 2009 5:38:51 PM
Geez Guido, I'm beginning to think that you have been "stalking" me for a very long time! Or maybe it's the other way around?Hmmmm, I graduated in '88 so you were at MSU for a little while when I was there too? So I guess I've been following YOU around! Can't believe we never ran into each other before this. Damn, we could have had a whole lotta fun! I could have used someone to keep up with me drinking those shark bowls
I hope you and your family have a wonderful Christmas and a GREAT New Year! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, December 24, 2009 4:41:48 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Well, why didn't you come over and say hello?!? LOL.
Wasn't at '83. I graduated HS in '86.
[guidogodoy] Thursday, December 24, 2009 4:41:48 PM
Well, why didn't you come over and say hello?!? LOL.
Wasn't at '83. I graduated HS in '86.
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:15:33 PM
OK, I just checked and Priest played the Lansing Civic Center NOT Spartan Stadium! Lots of misinformation out there.... but still, they played in LANSING? But just about every tour they hit Wings Stadium - they must have loved that place! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS from Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:03:59 PM)
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
It's always good to know that you aren't losing your mind.....yet anyway As I was looking up tour dates, I saw that Priest played Spartan Stadium in '83?? REALLY? If only I was 5 years older!! Can you imagine running into them on campus or at one of the bars after the show??
So you were at just about every Priest show that I went to! That is just amazing. What a small world. That Palace show just blew my freakin' mind! Wasn't Scott's drum solo killer? I've never been that impressed with a drum solo - he just kept beating the crap out of that kit! Even though the Palace was only about half full, we were LOUD!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ahhhhh! Many thanks. THAT helps. I have a DVD and VHS both with different dates...one 1990 and another 91. I was at the Alice show at the Knob as well as the one at the Palace (where they rocked the freaking house!!).
YES! Finally, confirmation. Megadeth did open for them at the palace (I have the bootleg) while they opened for Alice at the Knob (Alice put on a GREAT show, btw...I went for Priest but was blown away by the theatrics of Alice. Really unexpected.
I knew it! I have a mislabled tape. Once says 1990 and the other 1991. Same show. I KNOW (or would swear to have seen) them open with Hellbent on the first and close with it on another. They closed with it on the Alice tour.
Someone gave me an answer that they played the silverdome?!? Can't prove neither disprove that one. Wings, though, would make sense. Big horrible dome (like the Silverdome...did you see it sold for a few hundred thou? LOL). But that would be an easier mistake to make from a non-Michigander. Thanks! (Quoting Message by HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:39:47 PM)
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
Hey Guido! Priest played MI 3 times on the Painkiller tour: Dec 5,1990 at the Palace, Jan. 17, 1991 at Wings Stadium, and August 3, 1991 at Pine Knob (back when it was still called THE KNOB!). The only show I saw on that tour was the Palace show. We were in college and barely scraped the cash together for that show, not to mention it was during finals too. But WHAT A SHOW!!! Yup, the All Guns Blazing DVD is from the Palace show 12/5/90 and it has lines running through it. But it is great to have a video of the show you were actually at especially since we were in the nosebleed seats. By the way, as I mentioned to you, you can totally tell that there was tension between them during the show. Watch it and you'll notice that every time Rob walks toward Glenn they immediately both go in opposite directions. Rob only interacts with KK once and never goes over to Ian at all. I remember leaving that show thinking something was wrong. But did they put on a show, holy crap!! I think the August 1991 date was the tour with Alice Cooper. Megadeath opened for us at the Palace in 1990. So NO, you have not lost it at all, FAR from it! (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:21:32 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Bad copy of Detroit? It was pro-shot. My VHS even looks better than the dvd. I bet you just got a bad encoding. Seeing little horizontal lines, perhaps? I'll see what I can do to dupe a new copy from the VHS when I get a free minute (?...don't hold your breath).
Riddle me this, though. Am I completely confused or did Priest do two consecutive years of tours in Michigan. I could have sworn that this was the second. Played with Megadeth (I also have that bootleg). While the VHS and DVD have different years on them, it is the same show. 1990 Palace. I could SWEAR that they opened this one with Hell bent but closed with Hell bent on the other tour.
Tell me honestly, have I really lost it?
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
HELL YEAH HELLRIDER!! Let's talk about THE MIGHTY PAINKILLER!! That album kicks you in the face right from the beginning and never lets up! Not one bad or mellow song on the entire thing. I saw them in December 1990 at the Palace in Auburn Hills/Detroit. UNBELIEVABLE. Scott's drum solo had the floor and chairs shaking and my teeth were rattling in my head! It was THE BEST drum solo I have ever seen - usually I get bored during them I admit, but Scott's was incredible. And Rob's voice..... OMG..... dead on every single note on every single song. His voice just pierced right through me. We have the bootleg to that show and even though the video quality isn't very good, you can still hear how incredible Rob's vocals were. I have to say they were at the top of their game then. I am really hoping for a return to something like that.
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:50:20 PM
Edited at: Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:16:03 AM
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:03:59 PM
It's always good to know that you aren't losing your mind.....yet anyway As I was looking up tour dates, I saw that Priest played Spartan Stadium in '83?? REALLY? If only I was 5 years older!! Can you imagine running into them on campus or at one of the bars after the show??
So you were at just about every Priest show that I went to! That is just amazing. What a small world. That Palace show just blew my freakin' mind! Wasn't Scott's drum solo killer? I've never been that impressed with a drum solo - he just kept beating the crap out of that kit! Even though the Palace was only about half full, we were LOUD! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:15:01 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Ahhhhh! Many thanks. THAT helps. I have a DVD and VHS both with different dates...one 1990 and another 91. I was at the Alice show at the Knob as well as the one at the Palace (where they rocked the freaking house!!).
YES! Finally, confirmation. Megadeth did open for them at the palace (I have the bootleg) while they opened for Alice at the Knob (Alice put on a GREAT show, btw...I went for Priest but was blown away by the theatrics of Alice. Really unexpected.
I knew it! I have a mislabled tape. Once says 1990 and the other 1991. Same show. I KNOW (or would swear to have seen) them open with Hellbent on the first and close with it on another. They closed with it on the Alice tour.
Someone gave me an answer that they played the silverdome?!? Can't prove neither disprove that one. Wings, though, would make sense. Big horrible dome (like the Silverdome...did you see it sold for a few hundred thou? LOL). But that would be an easier mistake to make from a non-Michigander. Thanks! (Quoting Message by HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:39:47 PM)
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
Hey Guido! Priest played MI 3 times on the Painkiller tour: Dec 5,1990 at the Palace, Jan. 17, 1991 at Wings Stadium, and August 3, 1991 at Pine Knob (back when it was still called THE KNOB!). The only show I saw on that tour was the Palace show. We were in college and barely scraped the cash together for that show, not to mention it was during finals too. But WHAT A SHOW!!! Yup, the All Guns Blazing DVD is from the Palace show 12/5/90 and it has lines running through it. But it is great to have a video of the show you were actually at especially since we were in the nosebleed seats. By the way, as I mentioned to you, you can totally tell that there was tension between them during the show. Watch it and you'll notice that every time Rob walks toward Glenn they immediately both go in opposite directions. Rob only interacts with KK once and never goes over to Ian at all. I remember leaving that show thinking something was wrong. But did they put on a show, holy crap!! I think the August 1991 date was the tour with Alice Cooper. Megadeath opened for us at the Palace in 1990. So NO, you have not lost it at all, FAR from it! (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:21:32 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Bad copy of Detroit? It was pro-shot. My VHS even looks better than the dvd. I bet you just got a bad encoding. Seeing little horizontal lines, perhaps? I'll see what I can do to dupe a new copy from the VHS when I get a free minute (?...don't hold your breath).
Riddle me this, though. Am I completely confused or did Priest do two consecutive years of tours in Michigan. I could have sworn that this was the second. Played with Megadeth (I also have that bootleg). While the VHS and DVD have different years on them, it is the same show. 1990 Palace. I could SWEAR that they opened this one with Hell bent but closed with Hell bent on the other tour.
Tell me honestly, have I really lost it?
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
HELL YEAH HELLRIDER!! Let's talk about THE MIGHTY PAINKILLER!! That album kicks you in the face right from the beginning and never lets up! Not one bad or mellow song on the entire thing. I saw them in December 1990 at the Palace in Auburn Hills/Detroit. UNBELIEVABLE. Scott's drum solo had the floor and chairs shaking and my teeth were rattling in my head! It was THE BEST drum solo I have ever seen - usually I get bored during them I admit, but Scott's was incredible. And Rob's voice..... OMG..... dead on every single note on every single song. His voice just pierced right through me. We have the bootleg to that show and even though the video quality isn't very good, you can still hear how incredible Rob's vocals were. I have to say they were at the top of their game then. I am really hoping for a return to something like that.
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:50:20 PM
Edited at: Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:16:03 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:15:01 AM
Ahhhhh! Many thanks. THAT helps. I have a DVD and VHS both with different dates...one 1990 and another 91. I was at the Alice show at the Knob as well as the one at the Palace (where they rocked the freaking house!!).
YES! Finally, confirmation. Megadeth did open for them at the palace (I have the bootleg) while they opened for Alice at the Knob (Alice put on a GREAT show, btw...I went for Priest but was blown away by the theatrics of Alice. Really unexpected.
I knew it! I have a mislabled tape. Once says 1990 and the other 1991. Same show. I KNOW (or would swear to have seen) them open with Hellbent on the first and close with it on another. They closed with it on the Alice tour.
Someone gave me an answer that they played the silverdome?!? Can't prove neither disprove that one. Wings, though, would make sense. Big horrible dome (like the Silverdome...did you see it sold for a few hundred thou? LOL). But that would be an easier mistake to make from a non-Michigander. Thanks! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:39:47 PM)
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
Hey Guido! Priest played MI 3 times on the Painkiller tour: Dec 5,1990 at the Palace, Jan. 17, 1991 at Wings Stadium, and August 3, 1991 at Pine Knob (back when it was still called THE KNOB!). The only show I saw on that tour was the Palace show. We were in college and barely scraped the cash together for that show, not to mention it was during finals too. But WHAT A SHOW!!! Yup, the All Guns Blazing DVD is from the Palace show 12/5/90 and it has lines running through it. But it is great to have a video of the show you were actually at especially since we were in the nosebleed seats. By the way, as I mentioned to you, you can totally tell that there was tension between them during the show. Watch it and you'll notice that every time Rob walks toward Glenn they immediately both go in opposite directions. Rob only interacts with KK once and never goes over to Ian at all. I remember leaving that show thinking something was wrong. But did they put on a show, holy crap!! I think the August 1991 date was the tour with Alice Cooper. Megadeath opened for us at the Palace in 1990. So NO, you have not lost it at all, FAR from it! (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:21:32 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Bad copy of Detroit? It was pro-shot. My VHS even looks better than the dvd. I bet you just got a bad encoding. Seeing little horizontal lines, perhaps? I'll see what I can do to dupe a new copy from the VHS when I get a free minute (?...don't hold your breath).
Riddle me this, though. Am I completely confused or did Priest do two consecutive years of tours in Michigan. I could have sworn that this was the second. Played with Megadeth (I also have that bootleg). While the VHS and DVD have different years on them, it is the same show. 1990 Palace. I could SWEAR that they opened this one with Hell bent but closed with Hell bent on the other tour.
Tell me honestly, have I really lost it?
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
HELL YEAH HELLRIDER!! Let's talk about THE MIGHTY PAINKILLER!! That album kicks you in the face right from the beginning and never lets up! Not one bad or mellow song on the entire thing. I saw them in December 1990 at the Palace in Auburn Hills/Detroit. UNBELIEVABLE. Scott's drum solo had the floor and chairs shaking and my teeth were rattling in my head! It was THE BEST drum solo I have ever seen - usually I get bored during them I admit, but Scott's was incredible. And Rob's voice..... OMG..... dead on every single note on every single song. His voice just pierced right through me. We have the bootleg to that show and even though the video quality isn't very good, you can still hear how incredible Rob's vocals were. I have to say they were at the top of their game then. I am really hoping for a return to something like that.
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:50:20 PM
Edited at: Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:16:03 AM
[ProwlerCub] Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:09:39 AM
JD, thanks for respecting my opinion (a rarity on message boards). I honestly do not know why I prefer one to the other, certain aspects strike me differently at different times. To me, it felt like Priest were trying to play to the masses with both Turbo (glam-ish) and Ram It Down (faster music). I think all of the older metal guys were in the same situation of trying to figure where they fit in with the 80's metal scene, just look at how high Ozzy's hair was teased on the Ultimate Sin record and tour. I think they tried some new things and some worked, some did not. I still love the Turbo Lover Hi Octane mix, but I also like a lot of dance music from the 80's (go figure). [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:25:30 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I respect you opinion,but it baffles me that someone could enjoy the Turbo album more so than the Ram It Down album.The title track alone "Ram It Down" is better than any track off Turbo.So is the "Heavy Metal" track,and also for a commercial friendly song..."Come And Get It" is better than any track off of Turbo as well as Hard As Iron and Blood Red Skies. But to each his own.
Ram It Down while being not one of Priest's better albums is light years better quality than Turbo.
ProwlerCub wrote:
I actually like Turbo because there are some catchy songs on there. Of course I do have a problem with grown men singning about not needing Parental Guidance. I can see where it is considered a bit of a sell-out album because of the sound and the look the band went for at the time. IMO it is a lot better than the Ram It Down album (save Blood Red Skies).
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:39:47 PM
Hey Guido! Priest played MI 3 times on the Painkiller tour: Dec 5,1990 at the Palace, Jan. 17, 1991 at Wings Stadium, and August 3, 1991 at Pine Knob (back when it was still called THE KNOB!). The only show I saw on that tour was the Palace show. We were in college and barely scraped the cash together for that show, not to mention it was during finals too. But WHAT A SHOW!!! Yup, the All Guns Blazing DVD is from the Palace show 12/5/90 and it has lines running through it. But it is great to have a video of the show you were actually at especially since we were in the nosebleed seats. By the way, as I mentioned to you, you can totally tell that there was tension between them during the show. Watch it and you'll notice that every time Rob walks toward Glenn they immediately both go in opposite directions. Rob only interacts with KK once and never goes over to Ian at all. I remember leaving that show thinking something was wrong. But did they put on a show, holy crap!! I think the August 1991 date was the tour with Alice Cooper. Megadeath opened for us at the Palace in 1990. So NO, you have not lost it at all, FAR from it! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:21:32 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Bad copy of Detroit? It was pro-shot. My VHS even looks better than the dvd. I bet you just got a bad encoding. Seeing little horizontal lines, perhaps? I'll see what I can do to dupe a new copy from the VHS when I get a free minute (?...don't hold your breath).
Riddle me this, though. Am I completely confused or did Priest do two consecutive years of tours in Michigan. I could have sworn that this was the second. Played with Megadeth (I also have that bootleg). While the VHS and DVD have different years on them, it is the same show. 1990 Palace. I could SWEAR that they opened this one with Hell bent but closed with Hell bent on the other tour.
Tell me honestly, have I really lost it?
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
HELL YEAH HELLRIDER!! Let's talk about THE MIGHTY PAINKILLER!! That album kicks you in the face right from the beginning and never lets up! Not one bad or mellow song on the entire thing. I saw them in December 1990 at the Palace in Auburn Hills/Detroit. UNBELIEVABLE. Scott's drum solo had the floor and chairs shaking and my teeth were rattling in my head! It was THE BEST drum solo I have ever seen - usually I get bored during them I admit, but Scott's was incredible. And Rob's voice..... OMG..... dead on every single note on every single song. His voice just pierced right through me. We have the bootleg to that show and even though the video quality isn't very good, you can still hear how incredible Rob's vocals were. I have to say they were at the top of their game then. I am really hoping for a return to something like that.
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 11:50:20 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:21:32 PM
Bad copy of Detroit? It was pro-shot. My VHS even looks better than the dvd. I bet you just got a bad encoding. Seeing little horizontal lines, perhaps? I'll see what I can do to dupe a new copy from the VHS when I get a free minute (?...don't hold your breath).
Riddle me this, though. Am I completely confused or did Priest do two consecutive years of tours in Michigan. I could have sworn that this was the second. Played with Megadeth (I also have that bootleg). While the VHS and DVD have different years on them, it is the same show. 1990 Palace. I could SWEAR that they opened this one with Hell bent but closed with Hell bent on the other tour.
Tell me honestly, have I really lost it? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 7:56:29 PM)
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
HELL YEAH HELLRIDER!! Let's talk about THE MIGHTY PAINKILLER!! That album kicks you in the face right from the beginning and never lets up! Not one bad or mellow song on the entire thing. I saw them in December 1990 at the Palace in Auburn Hills/Detroit. UNBELIEVABLE. Scott's drum solo had the floor and chairs shaking and my teeth were rattling in my head! It was THE BEST drum solo I have ever seen - usually I get bored during them I admit, but Scott's was incredible. And Rob's voice..... OMG..... dead on every single note on every single song. His voice just pierced right through me. We have the bootleg to that show and even though the video quality isn't very good, you can still hear how incredible Rob's vocals were. I have to say they were at the top of their game then. I am really hoping for a return to something like that.
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 7:56:29 PM
HELL YEAH HELLRIDER!! Let's talk about THE MIGHTY PAINKILLER!! That album kicks you in the face right from the beginning and never lets up! Not one bad or mellow song on the entire thing. I saw them in December 1990 at the Palace in Auburn Hills/Detroit. UNBELIEVABLE. Scott's drum solo had the floor and chairs shaking and my teeth were rattling in my head! It was THE BEST drum solo I have ever seen - usually I get bored during them I admit, but Scott's was incredible. And Rob's voice..... OMG..... dead on every single note on every single song. His voice just pierced right through me. We have the bootleg to that show and even though the video quality isn't very good, you can still hear how incredible Rob's vocals were. I have to say they were at the top of their game then. I am really hoping for a return to something like that. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:25:19 PM)
[hellrider 31038] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:11:52 PM
well for my state of mind and well being i am going to concentrate on the NEXT ALBUM .like i told you before i heard like 2 seconds of it .lol.im serious..its just all this time going by they could be delivering us some classic albums that we would cherish for years. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:02:17 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
lol! Yeah I know it hellrider,but what have they done recently? Is it the Winter Songs album you are talking about? I hear what you are saying.I was in a shit mood they other day and got sick of seeing all these christmas metal songs by various artists...my brain needs "metal" and I think it is starving for it,it has to come from the masters,I can deal with it when they retire but for them to be still very active and not cranked out an entire albums worth of classic material in 5 years is getting impatient for myself. I kills me knowing that they can put out an album of excellence "if they wanted to"....
Hopfully they will get the same cravings for oldschool stripped down classic british metal,if they don't...we are fucked. And if they salvage any of those extra tracks from Nostradamus and slap them on the next studio album...we are double fucked hellrider!!! Arrrgh this band is killing me! LOL! Why do I like this band??? lofl hellrider!!!!
(Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:46:08 PM)
hellrider 31038 wrote:
yeah J.D DIAMOND THE COOOOMMMMMMAAAAANNNNNDDDDDEEEERRRRRRRR and they have done it again.my nerves are shot
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Well,with an album title such as "Defenders Of The Faith"(1984) meaning "defending the heavy metal faith" going on and on about how much the faith of heavy metal means to them ect...during the Defenders Of The Faith tour,and then do a compleate 180 turn and head in the opposite direction going against everything they said and create the Turbo album? It didn't make sense to me back in 1986 when they did it,and it doesn't make sense to me know albmost 25 years later. I read an article in 88' where Rob said "If we would of done anything of less quality on the turbo album I think it would of been a let down for myself and the fans".
He said something like that in the article I read back then,but I think what he was really saying is that after he looked at the album probly a year after its release,he realized they went too far in the other direction of heavy metal,and maybe he was saying it really was a let down,something they got caught up in at the moment back in 1986 where everything that looked like Poison and Motley Crue was selling huge amounts of albums which equals $cash in thy pocket.So I think that they really only did Turbo to get money,not for the "true Judas Priest" fans.They sold out BIG TIME and everybody knows it,the material shows.
Yes there are tons of fans who love Turbo and may think its one of Priest's best records,its up to the beholder to decide,everybody has an opinion.But the over-all majority of Priest fans 90% of them do not care for the Turbo album. I don't think that they "sold out" with Nostradamus though,I really think it was indeed targeted towards the true Judas Priest fanbase but just as something new and different to try out,but again in the same results I think it backfired at them for trying,however the material on Nostradamus is FAR better quality than that of the Turbo album.
I have very little "faith" in this band for hoping that they crank out a heavy metal album but its because of "experiments' they did with albums like Turbo,Demolition and Nostradamus....I wish there were 3 bold faced crushing heavy metal albums in the place of those 3 experimental albums,it would of made Judas Priest's discography look much better,but the band is content on trying new things regardless of what the majority of its true fanbase says.
(Quoting Message by truckreye from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:57:47 PM)
truckreye wrote:
Really anticlimatic after lyrics like I beleive you're the devil's child!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:45:45 PM
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:04:15 PM Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:04:45 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:02:17 PM
lol! Yeah I know it hellrider,but what have they done recently? Is it the Winter Songs album you are talking about? I hear what you are saying.I was in a shit mood they other day and got sick of seeing all these christmas metal songs by various artists...my brain needs "metal" and I think it is starving for it,it has to come from the masters,I can deal with it when they retire but for them to be still very active and not cranked out an entire albums worth of classic material in 5 years is getting impatient for myself. I kills me knowing that they can put out an album of excellence "if they wanted to"....
Hopfully they will get the same cravings for oldschool stripped down classic british metal,if they don't...we are fucked. And if they salvage any of those extra tracks from Nostradamus and slap them on the next studio album...we are double fucked hellrider!!! Arrrgh this band is killing me! LOL! Why do I like this band??? lofl hellrider!!!!
yeah J.D DIAMOND THE COOOOMMMMMMAAAAANNNNNDDDDDEEEERRRRRRRR and they have done it again.my nerves are shot
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Well,with an album title such as "Defenders Of The Faith"(1984) meaning "defending the heavy metal faith" going on and on about how much the faith of heavy metal means to them ect...during the Defenders Of The Faith tour,and then do a compleate 180 turn and head in the opposite direction going against everything they said and create the Turbo album? It didn't make sense to me back in 1986 when they did it,and it doesn't make sense to me know albmost 25 years later. I read an article in 88' where Rob said "If we would of done anything of less quality on the turbo album I think it would of been a let down for myself and the fans".
He said something like that in the article I read back then,but I think what he was really saying is that after he looked at the album probly a year after its release,he realized they went too far in the other direction of heavy metal,and maybe he was saying it really was a let down,something they got caught up in at the moment back in 1986 where everything that looked like Poison and Motley Crue was selling huge amounts of albums which equals $cash in thy pocket.So I think that they really only did Turbo to get money,not for the "true Judas Priest" fans.They sold out BIG TIME and everybody knows it,the material shows.
Yes there are tons of fans who love Turbo and may think its one of Priest's best records,its up to the beholder to decide,everybody has an opinion.But the over-all majority of Priest fans 90% of them do not care for the Turbo album. I don't think that they "sold out" with Nostradamus though,I really think it was indeed targeted towards the true Judas Priest fanbase but just as something new and different to try out,but again in the same results I think it backfired at them for trying,however the material on Nostradamus is FAR better quality than that of the Turbo album.
I have very little "faith" in this band for hoping that they crank out a heavy metal album but its because of "experiments' they did with albums like Turbo,Demolition and Nostradamus....I wish there were 3 bold faced crushing heavy metal albums in the place of those 3 experimental albums,it would of made Judas Priest's discography look much better,but the band is content on trying new things regardless of what the majority of its true fanbase says.
(Quoting Message by truckreye from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:57:47 PM)
truckreye wrote:
Really anticlimatic after lyrics like I beleive you're the devil's child!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:45:45 PM
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:04:15 PM Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:04:45 PM
[hellrider 31038] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:01:58 PM
oh oh oh J.D DIAMOND THE COOOMMMMMAAAANNNNDDDDEEEERRRRRRRR i thought you might be very excited to know i went over to the quorum and found out priest still have some unfinished tracks from nostradamus. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:42:39 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Well,with an album title such as "Defenders Of The Faith"(1984) meaning "defending the heavy metal faith" going on and on about how much the faith of heavy metal means to them ect...during the Defenders Of The Faith tour,and then do a compleate 180 turn and head in the opposite direction going against everything they said and create the Turbo album? It didn't make sense to me back in 1986 when they did it,and it doesn't make sense to me know albmost 25 years later. I read an article in 88' where Rob said "If we would of done anything of less quality on the turbo album I think it would of been a let down for myself and the fans".
He said something like that in the article I read back then,but I think what he was really saying is that after he looked at the album probly a year after its release,he realized they went too far in the other direction of heavy metal,and maybe he was saying it really was a let down,something they got caught up in at the moment back in 1986 where everything that looked like Poison and Motley Crue was selling huge amounts of albums which equals $cash in thy pocket.So I think that they really only did Turbo to get money,not for the "true Judas Priest" fans.They sold out BIG TIME and everybody knows it,the material shows.
Yes there are tons of fans who love Turbo and may think its one of Priest's best records,its up to the beholder to decide,everybody has an opinion.But the over-all majority of Priest fans 90% of them do not care for the Turbo album. I don't think that they "sold out" with Nostradamus though,I really think it was indeed targeted towards the true Judas Priest fanbase but just as something new and different to try out,but again in the same results I think it backfired at them for trying,however the material on Nostradamus is FAR better quality than that of the Turbo album.
I have very little "faith" in this band for hoping that they crank out a heavy metal album but its because of "experiments' they did with albums like Turbo,Demolition and Nostradamus....I wish there were 3 bold faced crushing heavy metal albums in the place of those 3 experimental albums,it would of made Judas Priest's discography look much better,but the band is content on trying new things regardless of what the majority of its true fanbase says.
(Quoting Message by truckreye from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:57:47 PM)
truckreye wrote:
Really anticlimatic after lyrics like I beleive you're the devil's child!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:45:45 PM
[hellrider 31038] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:46:08 PM
yeah J.D DIAMOND THE COOOOMMMMMMAAAAANNNNNDDDDDEEEERRRRRRRR and they have done it again.my nerves are shot [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:42:39 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Well,with an album title such as "Defenders Of The Faith"(1984) meaning "defending the heavy metal faith" going on and on about how much the faith of heavy metal means to them ect...during the Defenders Of The Faith tour,and then do a compleate 180 turn and head in the opposite direction going against everything they said and create the Turbo album? It didn't make sense to me back in 1986 when they did it,and it doesn't make sense to me know albmost 25 years later. I read an article in 88' where Rob said "If we would of done anything of less quality on the turbo album I think it would of been a let down for myself and the fans".
He said something like that in the article I read back then,but I think what he was really saying is that after he looked at the album probly a year after its release,he realized they went too far in the other direction of heavy metal,and maybe he was saying it really was a let down,something they got caught up in at the moment back in 1986 where everything that looked like Poison and Motley Crue was selling huge amounts of albums which equals $cash in thy pocket.So I think that they really only did Turbo to get money,not for the "true Judas Priest" fans.They sold out BIG TIME and everybody knows it,the material shows.
Yes there are tons of fans who love Turbo and may think its one of Priest's best records,its up to the beholder to decide,everybody has an opinion.But the over-all majority of Priest fans 90% of them do not care for the Turbo album. I don't think that they "sold out" with Nostradamus though,I really think it was indeed targeted towards the true Judas Priest fanbase but just as something new and different to try out,but again in the same results I think it backfired at them for trying,however the material on Nostradamus is FAR better quality than that of the Turbo album.
I have very little "faith" in this band for hoping that they crank out a heavy metal album but its because of "experiments' they did with albums like Turbo,Demolition and Nostradamus....I wish there were 3 bold faced crushing heavy metal albums in the place of those 3 experimental albums,it would of made Judas Priest's discography look much better,but the band is content on trying new things regardless of what the majority of its true fanbase says.
(Quoting Message by truckreye from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:57:47 PM)
truckreye wrote:
Really anticlimatic after lyrics like I beleive you're the devil's child!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:45:45 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:42:39 PM
Well,with an album title such as "Defenders Of The Faith"(1984) meaning "defending the heavy metal faith" going on and on about how much the faith of heavy metal means to them ect...during the Defenders Of The Faith tour,and then do a compleate 180 turn and head in the opposite direction going against everything they said and create the Turbo album? It didn't make sense to me back in 1986 when they did it,and it doesn't make sense to me know albmost 25 years later. I read an article in 88' where Rob said "If we would of done anything of less quality on the turbo album I think it would of been a let down for myself and the fans".
He said something like that in the article I read back then,but I think what he was really saying is that after he looked at the album probly a year after its release,he realized they went too far in the other direction of heavy metal,and maybe he was saying it really was a let down,something they got caught up in at the moment back in 1986 where everything that looked like Poison and Motley Crue was selling huge amounts of albums which equals $cash in thy pocket.So I think that they really only did Turbo to get money,not for the "true Judas Priest" fans.They sold out BIG TIME and everybody knows it,the material shows.
Yes there are tons of fans who love Turbo and may think its one of Priest's best records,its up to the beholder to decide,everybody has an opinion.But the over-all majority of Priest fans 90% of them do not care for the Turbo album. I don't think that they "sold out" with Nostradamus though,I really think it was indeed targeted towards the true Judas Priest fanbase but just as something new and different to try out,but again in the same results I think it backfired at them for trying,however the material on Nostradamus is FAR better quality than that of the Turbo album.
I have very little "faith" in this band for hoping that they crank out a heavy metal album but its because of "experiments' they did with albums like Turbo,Demolition and Nostradamus....I wish there were 3 bold faced crushing heavy metal albums in the place of those 3 experimental albums,it would of made Judas Priest's discography look much better,but the band is content on trying new things regardless of what the majority of its true fanbase says.
Really anticlimatic after lyrics like I beleive you're the devil's child!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:45:45 PM
[truckreye] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:57:47 PM
Really anticlimatic after lyrics like I beleive you're the devil's child!!!
[truckreye] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:55:55 PM
But with lyrics like We dont need no ,no, no,no parental guidance here you can't really blame me.
[truckreye] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:53:23 PM
Actually after Screamin' and Defenders I didnt keep up with Priest much.
[truckreye] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:49:47 PM
Perhaps but the worst metal album EVER? Damn!
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:43:49 PM
Well,with tracks like "Parental Guidence,Private Property,Rock You All Around The World",and Hot For lOve...how couldn't it be the worst? lol! The only 3 tracks out of 9 tracks that are salvagable are "Out In tHe Cold,Wild Nights and Reckless". The other tracks are an embarressment. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by truckreye from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:36:48 PM)
truckreye wrote:
Damn!
[truckreye] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:36:48 PM
Damn!
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:35:33 PM
In my opinion,the "Turbo" album is not only the worst LP by Judas Priest,but may be the worst LP by ANY heavy metal artist in the last 25 years.
[truckreye] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:27:42 PM
yeahitscool.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:25:30 PM
I respect you opinion,but it baffles me that someone could enjoy the Turbo album more so than the Ram It Down album.The title track alone "Ram It Down" is better than any track off Turbo.So is the "Heavy Metal" track,and also for a commercial friendly song..."Come And Get It" is better than any track off of Turbo as well as Hard As Iron and Blood Red Skies. But to each his own.
Ram It Down while being not one of Priest's better albums is light years better quality than Turbo. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ProwlerCub from Wednesday, December 23, 2009 12:29:58 PM)
ProwlerCub wrote:
I actually like Turbo because there are some catchy songs on there. Of course I do have a problem with grown men singning about not needing Parental Guidance. I can see where it is considered a bit of a sell-out album because of the sound and the look the band went for at the time. IMO it is a lot better than the Ram It Down album (save Blood Red Skies).
[ProwlerCub] Wednesday, December 23, 2009 12:29:58 PM
I actually like Turbo because there are some catchy songs on there. Of course I do have a problem with grown men singning about not needing Parental Guidance. I can see where it is considered a bit of a sell-out album because of the sound and the look the band went for at the time. IMO it is a lot better than the Ram It Down album (save Blood Red Skies).
[Dale T.] Saturday, December 19, 2009 12:12:03 PM
This stuff is the greatest. Rob is epic , nobody can beat the music and especially the guitar solos on this. They're out of this world. Shoot! Funny thing is these guys can still kick the crap out of bands today and they are almost 60. Halford is the best front man ever. Tip and KK the best tandom on the axes. And of course the Priest magic. Can't touch em.
Edited at: Saturday, December 19, 2009 12:15:01 PM
[jimmyjames] Friday, December 18, 2009 4:55:03 PM
I think it's Turbo, with a u.
[K2M] Friday, December 18, 2009 1:47:47 PM
Awesome Muscianship. Great creative forces united
[J.D. DIAMOND] Friday, December 18, 2009 3:38:51 AM
No Dale,Jugulator did not have any "thrash" elements in it,Ripper Owen's backing vocals on the song Jugulator("mutilate"!) is not "thrash" it is again british heavy metal at it's heaviest,not fucking "thrash".Obviously you have no idea what "thrash" really is,because Judas Priest has never had any elements of thrash in any of thier songs. And you really think they can do rap or disco and pull it off? Uuhh,ok "fanboy". [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Dale T. from Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:16:52 PM)
Dale T. wrote:
I love Reckless. If Metal Gods wanted to do "disco" or "rap" they would be the one metal band that could pull it off and make it sound good. Jugulator has thrash elements so yes that have done it all. Slipknot, Metallica and all the biggies out there were influenced by Judas Priest, and they were the reason they started to play in the first place. Shoot!! Priest were the defining Heavy Metal gods of the 80s and still are along with Dio, Iron Maiden-True to the Core Classic Heavy metal!! Calling the turbo album "pathetic" IMHO is just nonsense and an insult to the Metal Gods. Edited at: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:35:06 PM
[Dale T.] Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:16:52 PM
I love Reckless. If Metal Gods wanted to do "disco" or "rap" they would be the one metal band that could pull it off and make it sound good. Jugulator has thrash elements so yes that have done it all. Slipknot, Metallica and all the biggies out there were influenced by Judas Priest, and they were the reason they started to play in the first place. Shoot!! Priest were the defining Heavy Metal gods of the 80s and still are along with Dio, Iron Maiden-True to the Core Classic Heavy metal!! Calling the turbo album "pathetic" IMHO is just nonsense and an insult to the Metal Gods. Edited at: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:35:06 PM
[scthree05] Thursday, December 17, 2009 6:23:27 PM
i have never been a huge fan of turbo. but i don't think it was a sellout as some claim. it was different and a bit "poppier." but it did create one of my all time favorite songs "reckless." i was born in 1970 and i was one of many that discovered priest with screaming for vengeance. so while i love the stuff before screaming i wasn't listening to them when those records came out. but if i understand correctly point of entry was recieved in a similar way. but i love point of entry, my point that i am rambling towards is that this band could crank out the same album every two years and quite a few of us would buy it and love it. but taking this easy route isn't what they do. i enjoy hearing them cover new ground and going down more creative roads. Nost. is not defenders or sin after sin, and thank god, rob, glenn and k.k. for that!
<< Previous
Message 1 to 100
Messages per page: 2050 [100]
Message display order: [Newest first] Oldest first Page: [1] 2
how can you not like you say yes?
As I was looking up tour dates, I saw that Priest played Spartan Stadium in '83?? REALLY? If only I was 5 years older!! Can you imagine running into them on campus or at one of the bars after the show?? 