You do not have enough Respect Points to post in this topic.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, June 20, 2010 8:19:36 PM
Well you see Evans,the difference between you and me is that I'm a well respected veteran member here while your a worthless "inferior to J.D." idiot that can't function here without my presence,people don't back me up because of my good looks,they respond simply because of your "idiocy". I'll always be "up here"....and you'll always be "down there",I'm always one step ahead of you and always will be undefeated.There is nothing that you can do to be accepted in this forum. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Sunday, June 20, 2010 6:13:41 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Well you see Diamond...thats the difference between you and me. I don't need someone to back be up all the time. I do understand why you do though. Ha!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HAHA! Yes spapad,I do know "who". But to keep on the same level for shits and giggles...Brian_Evans feels inferior to those who are better than him,those who are smarter than him and those especially who are more liked by others in this forum and in this case there is no exception HA! Its always a pleasure to post over his incredibly unintelligent words and to sit back and watch nobody back him up because the lack of friends he has here. Strike one more victory up for J.D. The Commander!!!!!!!!!!
spapad wrote:
Nice J.D..............Too bad the trolls come back with you just showing up a couple days. Somethings tells me Someone never got over it. lol You know who. LMAO! What a fricken joke this guy is!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I prefer Metalhead over Killing Ground but Killing Ground is definately a great album,only like 2 songs that are under-par,the rest of the album is great.
(Quoting Message by Painkiller87 from Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:11:31 AM)
Edited at: Sunday, June 20, 2010 2:12:46 PM
[Brian_Evans] Sunday, June 20, 2010 6:13:41 PM
Well you see Diamond...thats the difference between you and me. I don't need someone to back be up all the time. I do understand why you do though. Ha! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, June 20, 2010 5:25:44 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HAHA! Yes spapad,I do know "who". But to keep on the same level for shits and giggles...Brian_Evans feels inferior to those who are better than him,those who are smarter than him and those especially who are more liked by others in this forum and in this case there is no exception HA! Its always a pleasure to post over his incredibly unintelligent words and to sit back and watch nobody back him up because the lack of friends he has here. Strike one more victory up for J.D. The Commander!!!!!!!!!!
spapad wrote:
Nice J.D..............Too bad the trolls come back with you just showing up a couple days. Somethings tells me Someone never got over it. lol You know who. LMAO! What a fricken joke this guy is!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I prefer Metalhead over Killing Ground but Killing Ground is definately a great album,only like 2 songs that are under-par,the rest of the album is great.
(Quoting Message by Painkiller87 from Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:11:31 AM)
Edited at: Sunday, June 20, 2010 2:12:46 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, June 20, 2010 5:25:44 PM
HAHA! Yes spapad,I do know "who". But to keep on the same level for shits and giggles...Brian_Evans feels inferior to those who are better than him,those who are smarter than him and those especially who are more liked by others in this forum and in this case there is no exception HA! Its always a pleasure to post over his incredibly unintelligent words and to sit back and watch nobody back him up because the lack of friends he has here. Strike one more victory up for J.D. The Commander!!!!!!!!!!
Nice J.D..............Too bad the trolls come back with you just showing up a couple days. Somethings tells me Someone never got over it. lol You know who. LMAO! What a fricken joke this guy is!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I prefer Metalhead over Killing Ground but Killing Ground is definately a great album,only like 2 songs that are under-par,the rest of the album is great.
(Quoting Message by Painkiller87 from Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:11:31 AM)
Edited at: Sunday, June 20, 2010 2:12:46 PM
[spapad] Sunday, June 20, 2010 4:31:31 PM
Nice J.D..............Too bad the trolls come back with you just showing up a couple days. Somethings tells me Someone never got over it. lol You know who. LMAO! What a fricken joke this guy is! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, June 20, 2010 2:12:14 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I prefer Metalhead over Killing Ground but Killing Ground is definately a great album,only like 2 songs that are under-par,the rest of the album is great.
(Quoting Message by Painkiller87 from Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:11:31 AM)
I prefer Metalhead over Killing Ground but Killing Ground is definately a great album,only like 2 songs that are under-par,the rest of the album is great.
(Quoting Message by Painkiller87 from Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:11:31 AM)
Edited at: Sunday, June 20, 2010 2:12:46 PM
[Brian_Evans] Sunday, June 20, 2010 4:17:04 PM
LMAO!
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, June 20, 2010 2:12:14 PM
I prefer Metalhead over Killing Ground but Killing Ground is definately a great album,only like 2 songs that are under-par,the rest of the album is great.
[Painkiller87] Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:11:31 AM
That's a good one for a tribute. Speaking of which I actually got Metalhead and Killing Ground a couple of days ago and I love them, especially Killing Ground. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, May 18, 2010 1:43:32 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Saxon - Sea Of Life Metalhead album 1999 (not sure why they are showing the Lionheart album cover)
Heres a Tribute to Ronnie James Dio Edited at: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 1:43:44 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Tuesday, May 18, 2010 1:43:32 PM
Saxon - Sea Of Life Metalhead album 1999 (not sure why they are showing the Lionheart album cover)
Heres a Tribute to Ronnie James Dio Edited at: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 1:43:44 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, May 15, 2010 11:38:51 AM
Saxon Motorcycle Man -Wacken 2001
Bang your fuckin heads,this kicks the living shit out of anything Maiden has done in 26 years!!!!!!
Comes off pretty well live
I love this song, one of their best.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Atila The Hun
Edited at: Saturday, May 15, 2010 11:39:21 AM
[kiamat] Sunday, May 09, 2010 4:11:56 PM
Comes off pretty well live
I love this song, one of their best. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, May 09, 2010 12:05:05 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Atila The Hun
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, May 09, 2010 12:05:05 PM
Atila The Hun
[Budred] Sunday, May 02, 2010 5:24:50 AM
You have to understand, I know nothing about this shit. Also my financial
situation doesn't allow me to buy anything I want. As bad as you make it sound,
my discs are turning out pretty good. I bought an MP3 version of "Feel the Same"
by Riot. I recently recorded/converted the whole LP. My version has a bassier
and louder sound than the MP3. Also when I play Cd's that were originally released
on vinyl they do not sound as good as the vinyl I'm putting to disc. I would love to
do what you're telling me but my funds limit me. I appreciate all you tell me and feel
free to rip what I'm doing. I'm not taking it as a personal attack. I'm using it as a way
to learn. Take care man.
Eech. Sorry to say that I know it. We bought one Ion for my lab and hated it right away. Cheap price, yes, but cheap quality as well. It has since been "retired."
I shouldn't say any more. If you are happy with it, great. I bought a new booster for my old turntable, ran it through my stereo and to my computer. My rips are all but flawless. Know that you are limited by software. Ion sucks. You can do a firmware hack but it is difficult. Keep ripping your MP3s in the highest bitrate possible is my best suggestion. (Quoting Message by Budred from Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:37:45 PM)
Budred wrote:
Ion
guidogodoy wrote:
You didn't name the make of your USB turntable but there aren't that many. 256 or 512k is most likely the ripping rate. It is really quite easy to get a "true" rip instead of an MP3. Look at Halford's site. He releases his free tracks in different bitrates. Two different MP3 bitrates and lossless (flac). To get your USB turntable (irrespective of the make) is usually quite easy and free. Look at Audible and here ==>flac.sourceforge.net/ The term "digital" is quite subjective. To put it simply, there is not one single format. On second look, I see that Halford also releases 126kbs. Inferior quality to be sure. Listen to it on a quality 6.1 quality system and you'll certainly hear it.
Budred wrote:
I understand that analog is better than digital. More bits of music per second equals a fuller,
better sound. It's the transfer sounding better than disc I don't get. I figured once that was done
the quality would degrade to digital. Right now recording to MP3 is all I can do. I have a USB turntable
that has EZ Vinyl Converter program built in. I know nothing about flac or even what that is. I
probably come off as stupid but really, it's just a lack of knowledge. I'm still in my first year with
computers and quite honestly, I don't do much on it. Most of my computer time is spent here.
I do like to learn though and will try to figure out what you're telling me. I knew you would have an answer,
you are quite knowledgeable. Even though MP3 may not be the way to go I am amazed my discs are
sounding as good as they do. Take care man.
All depends on the turntable and especially the cartridge. Like I said, the first answer to the link above had it right.
Edited at: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:25:25 PM
Edited at: Saturday, May 01, 2010 10:07:48 PM
[guidogodoy] Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:54:52 PM
Eech. Sorry to say that I know it. We bought one Ion for my lab and hated it right away. Cheap price, yes, but cheap quality as well. It has since been "retired."
I shouldn't say any more. If you are happy with it, great. I bought a new booster for my old turntable, ran it through my stereo and to my computer. My rips are all but flawless. Know that you are limited by software. Ion sucks. You can do a firmware hack but it is difficult. Keep ripping your MP3s in the highest bitrate possible is my best suggestion. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Budred from Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:37:45 PM)
Budred wrote:
Ion
guidogodoy wrote:
You didn't name the make of your USB turntable but there aren't that many. 256 or 512k is most likely the ripping rate. It is really quite easy to get a "true" rip instead of an MP3. Look at Halford's site. He releases his free tracks in different bitrates. Two different MP3 bitrates and lossless (flac). To get your USB turntable (irrespective of the make) is usually quite easy and free. Look at Audible and here ==>flac.sourceforge.net/ The term "digital" is quite subjective. To put it simply, there is not one single format. On second look, I see that Halford also releases 126kbs. Inferior quality to be sure. Listen to it on a quality 6.1 quality system and you'll certainly hear it.
Budred wrote:
I understand that analog is better than digital. More bits of music per second equals a fuller,
better sound. It's the transfer sounding better than disc I don't get. I figured once that was done
the quality would degrade to digital. Right now recording to MP3 is all I can do. I have a USB turntable
that has EZ Vinyl Converter program built in. I know nothing about flac or even what that is. I
probably come off as stupid but really, it's just a lack of knowledge. I'm still in my first year with
computers and quite honestly, I don't do much on it. Most of my computer time is spent here.
I do like to learn though and will try to figure out what you're telling me. I knew you would have an answer,
you are quite knowledgeable. Even though MP3 may not be the way to go I am amazed my discs are
sounding as good as they do. Take care man.
You didn't name the make of your USB turntable but there aren't that many. 256 or 512k is most likely the ripping rate. It is really quite easy to get a "true" rip instead of an MP3. Look at Halford's site. He releases his free tracks in different bitrates. Two different MP3 bitrates and lossless (flac). To get your USB turntable (irrespective of the make) is usually quite easy and free. Look at Audible and here ==>flac.sourceforge.net/ The term "digital" is quite subjective. To put it simply, there is not one single format. On second look, I see that Halford also releases 126kbs. Inferior quality to be sure. Listen to it on a quality 6.1 quality system and you'll certainly hear it.
Budred wrote:
I understand that analog is better than digital. More bits of music per second equals a fuller,
better sound. It's the transfer sounding better than disc I don't get. I figured once that was done
the quality would degrade to digital. Right now recording to MP3 is all I can do. I have a USB turntable
that has EZ Vinyl Converter program built in. I know nothing about flac or even what that is. I
probably come off as stupid but really, it's just a lack of knowledge. I'm still in my first year with
computers and quite honestly, I don't do much on it. Most of my computer time is spent here.
I do like to learn though and will try to figure out what you're telling me. I knew you would have an answer,
you are quite knowledgeable. Even though MP3 may not be the way to go I am amazed my discs are
sounding as good as they do. Take care man.
All depends on the turntable and especially the cartridge. Like I said, the first answer to the link above had it right.
Edited at: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:25:25 PM
[guidogodoy] Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:16:20 PM
Look at the top of this Halford page. Look at the bitrates. Flac and WMA both are considered "lossless" at least in the way they release it. WMA DOES have a lossy format. www.halfordmusic.com/content/static/index.html
Edited at: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:17:52 PM
[guidogodoy] Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:11:09 PM
You didn't name the make of your USB turntable but there aren't that many. 256 or 512k is most likely the ripping rate. It is really quite easy to get a "true" rip instead of an MP3. Look at Halford's site. He releases his free tracks in different bitrates. Two different MP3 bitrates and lossless (flac). To get your USB turntable (irrespective of the make) is usually quite easy and free. Look at Audible and here ==>flac.sourceforge.net/ The term "digital" is quite subjective. To put it simply, there is not one single format. On second look, I see that Halford also releases 126kbs. Inferior quality to be sure. Listen to it on a quality 6.1 quality system and you'll certainly hear it.
Budred wrote:
I understand that analog is better than digital. More bits of music per second equals a fuller,
better sound. It's the transfer sounding better than disc I don't get. I figured once that was done
the quality would degrade to digital. Right now recording to MP3 is all I can do. I have a USB turntable
that has EZ Vinyl Converter program built in. I know nothing about flac or even what that is. I
probably come off as stupid but really, it's just a lack of knowledge. I'm still in my first year with
computers and quite honestly, I don't do much on it. Most of my computer time is spent here.
I do like to learn though and will try to figure out what you're telling me. I knew you would have an answer,
you are quite knowledgeable. Even though MP3 may not be the way to go I am amazed my discs are
sounding as good as they do. Take care man.
All depends on the turntable and especially the cartridge. Like I said, the first answer to the link above had it right.
Edited at: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:25:25 PM
[Budred] Saturday, May 01, 2010 8:44:49 PM
I understand that analog is better than digital. More bits of music per second equals a fuller,
better sound. It's the transfer sounding better than disc I don't get. I figured once that was done
the quality would degrade to digital. Right now recording to MP3 is all I can do. I have a USB turntable
that has EZ Vinyl Converter program built in. I know nothing about flac or even what that is. I
probably come off as stupid but really, it's just a lack of knowledge. I'm still in my first year with
computers and quite honestly, I don't do much on it. Most of my computer time is spent here.
I do like to learn though and will try to figure out what you're telling me. I knew you would have an answer,
you are quite knowledgeable. Even though MP3 may not be the way to go I am amazed my discs are
sounding as good as they do. Take care man. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Saturday, May 01, 2010 6:27:30 PM)
All depends on the turntable and especially the cartridge. Like I said, the first answer to the link above had it right.
[guidogodoy] Saturday, May 01, 2010 6:21:14 PM
LPs have better depth. The range is better (highs and lows), IMO. I run a 5.1 on my computer and a 6.1 surround in my main room. I'd only suggest that you NOT rip to MP3. It is a "lossy format." Like zipping a file, it makes adjustments to the highs / lows and even midrange to keep the filesize small. Rip to flac. Most trading sites don't even accept MP3s as they are flawed. Flac is an exact replica. A google search can teach you how to do it. All you need is the right codex. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Budred from Saturday, May 01, 2010 6:05:55 PM)
Budred wrote:
I still have a couple of Venom LP"s. Welcome to Hell and At War With Satan.
I plan on converting them to MP3 and then to disc this weekend. I have about
80 albums I want to do this to. I did 15 already and they sound really good. I
think they sound better than regular cd's. I did Saxon's Strong Arm of the law
a few weeks back. The cool thing about doing this is that I'm hearing albums I
haven't heard in over twenty years. I have about 200 albums but only about 90
that I haven't already bought on disc. The cd's I'm making sound better than
manufactured cd's of the same album. When I finish doing the ones I don't have
on disc i'm thinking of doing my Priest albums. I knew LP"s sounded better than
disc but I didn't know converting them would sound better also. Can anyone
explain this? ....Guido? (knower of all)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Well they are alright Budred,I don't have anything negative to say about them,but I really don't get into too many bands that play heavy metal/thrash,only a hand full throughout the years but they are close to some of the bands that I like,Hirax,Deathrow,Hallow's Eve,Razor but these bands I only like certain albums from,not every album ect.... Good example though.
My favorite styles of music are traditional heavy metal and "OLD" black metal from 1980 when Venom started it up to the year 1995 but I'll give it untill the year 2000 but after that I don't like any bands that emerged onto the scene.At this point its just ridiculous to form a "black metal band",fans of this once elite genre who enjoy it should NOT form a black metal band,they should let the old school bands do thier thing. I really don't like very much "death metal" at all even though I have a fun project with a friend for the last 10 years that is early 90's death metal but its in the vien of old Morbid Angel and old Deicide. Those 2 bands are the best death metal bands but only thier early work,thier later stuff is ridiculous and boring,sold out and washed up.
(Quoting Message by Budred from Friday, April 30, 2010 7:27:23 AM)
Budred wrote:
J.D., I don't have a link but go to Lastfm and key in Fog of War616 and
listen to the track Fog of War. It's not that I think you'll love it but it reminds
me of the kind of music you're always talking about. It's a little thrashy, with
a European style of guitar playing and decent vocals. Check it out and let
me know what you think. I don't think you have to sign up to listen to music
there. Check out my page. Check out my journal of "Bands I've seen live".
Some will make you puke but I think you'll notice an interesting mix of music.
Realize that alot of these bands were openers so it's not like I went there to see them.
Also a couple of the shows I went because my wife wanted to. She was a dance teacher
for 15 years so don't hate too much when you read them. Peace!
