...And that's why Guido has to take care of his real glasses. Prescription glasses aren't cheap, you know.
I'm sure he can wear the Elton John ones at a Bee Gees concert without getting too many stares.
spapad wrote:
Could possibly come in handy at a concert outside if you wear glasses, but DAMN! Your Cred, would go WAY down! LMAO! Those are definately NOT METAL! LOL
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[spapad] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:20:55 PM
Hey, if you don't have the big gap toothed smile to go with it, it would be wasted. Stick to Devil Horns and Priest necklaces for ID, never want to see those garish things on your face! HAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!
Guid at a BeeGee's concert? Parish the thought Vail! I'm getting sick mental images as I type! LMAO! High pitch falcetto and all! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:16:48 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
So you are saying that I shouldn't even try the Elton pose, eh? I HAVE the rings!! LOL!!!
spapad wrote:
Could possibly come in handy at a concert outside if you wear glasses, but DAMN! Your Cred, would go WAY down! LMAO! Those are definately NOT METAL! LOL
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:16:48 PM
So you are saying that I shouldn't even try the Elton pose, eh? I HAVE the rings!! LOL!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:11:35 PM)
spapad wrote:
Could possibly come in handy at a concert outside if you wear glasses, but DAMN! Your Cred, would go WAY down! LMAO! Those are definately NOT METAL! LOL
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:16:25 PM
...And that's why Guido has to take care of his real glasses. Prescription glasses aren't cheap, you know.
I'm sure he can wear the Elton John ones at a Bee Gees concert without getting too many stares. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:11:35 PM)
spapad wrote:
Could possibly come in handy at a concert outside if you wear glasses, but DAMN! Your Cred, would go WAY down! LMAO! Those are definately NOT METAL! LOL
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:14:43 PM
Me? Toothy grin? NEVER!!!
Never could smile for a camera....gave up long ago. Then again, I never did try the "Elton" below. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:09:28 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Wipers would be good (haven't seen too many pics of you with a toothy grin, really). You'll benefit from those wipers alot, especially when it rains.
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, with or without wipers? HAAAAA!!!!
ps. (my teeth are better than Sir Elton's)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[spapad] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:11:35 PM
Could possibly come in handy at a concert outside if you wear glasses, but DAMN! Your Cred, would go WAY down! LMAO! Those are definately NOT METAL! LOL [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:02:27 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:09:28 PM
Wipers would be good (haven't seen too many pics of you with a toothy grin, really). You'll benefit from those wipers alot, especially when it rains.
Ok, with or without wipers? HAAAAA!!!!
ps. (my teeth are better than Sir Elton's)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:05:32 PM
Ok, with or without wipers? HAAAAA!!!!
ps. (my teeth are better than Sir Elton's) [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:02:27 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:02:27 PM
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:57:51 PM
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:54:24 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:54:24 PM
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:48:43 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:48:43 PM
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Head banger] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:22:44 AM
where the fuck is the global warming? monday it looks like I need a snow shovel!!!
Well, yeah. But in Picards era, really tight costumes were in. Well, true, for women and men, but I have selective vision, so thats not a problem.
ronhartsell wrote:
I understand...he's too serious for my taste and too many characters with too many problems...the original was lighter and funnier...and mini skirts were in!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[_strat_] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:30:31 PM
I agree. Kirk would be the first to pick up soap in the cube. Not Picard, tho.
Anyway, we Picard loyalists have to stick together. There are Kirk minions everywhere. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Painkiller87 from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:17:03 PM)
Painkiller87 wrote:
I like both Picard and Kirk but I like Picard a lot more because he has a more true captain personality. Plus he got assimilated by the borg and then brought back to normal and lived to fight another day. The Borg are a force to never mess with.
_strat_ wrote:
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[_strat_] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:27:24 PM
Well, yeah. But in Picards era, really tight costumes were in. Well, true, for women and men, but I have selective vision, so thats not a problem. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:16:23 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
I understand...he's too serious for my taste and too many characters with too many problems...the original was lighter and funnier...and mini skirts were in!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
NOT Kardashians....;)
