there are sites that actually explains them hahahaah lmaoooooo!!!!! this is the butterfly guard, that is actually it's name! that's what I call explicit

		devils_child wrote:
		Perhaps we are just too much to handle... hehe I like to think so anyway.        adrianaec_88 wrote: I know... they always go, like in the sinfull   that guy on the floor seems scared lmao!      devils_child wrote: Where are all the guys....?!?! We're talking about sex positions!!   I call this one "The pony ride".... HAHA

men and women, why not? that's the reason women see it actually, you can get lots of ideas from there LMAO!
now I'm talking serious (yeah think that's possible for just a sec) I have seen it a couple of times, though I like seeing those kind of sports sometimes, I prefer boxing or judo than those UFC wrestling... dunno why

		devils_child wrote:
		Yeah, I swear they get into all these sex positions.... Even a few I've never seen before. ... I think a young man can learn alot from UFC...hehehe      adrianaec_88 wrote: hahaha  I know.... they always end up in that possition and I think ..mmm that's not too manly... lol I prefer boxing than those UFC fights      devils_child wrote: I watched UFC once.....Two sweaty guys all over each other, half the time they're in missionary position?!?!  Give me a boxing match anyday!      ronhartsell wrote: Glad there's no appologies for liking this medievil sport...I think 'it's' in our nature to go at it from time to time...but there's a difference between cracking a que stick on someones back versus a battle with sportsmanship (the gore is a bonus for some!!)...I have not faught with pugil sticks since my Marine days, that was and still is an art taught in boot camp...in a controlled environment, man vs. man, what more could you ask for??...      Deep Freeze wrote: Well, to me, beauty is subjective. So much so that I cannot see the point in the contests. Miss America, Miss World, et al. Far too ambiguous for me to accept a "winner". From what I have seen, they are all pretty good looking. Tough for me to say who is the "best". I mean, I have my preferences, just as anyone else. Same thing with porn...what turns me on may not be the same for others. HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have always enjoy pugilism. Growing up in a family with three brothers, we practiced it more than most folks do...HA!!!!!!!!!!!! Fought all the time. I do enjoy a good boxing match but the UFC is something all together different. This is mayhem. When it first began years ago, there were not many "rules" and it was almost like watching gladiators! It was WAY too brutal. As it is now, they have made it more about the martial arts which is interesting but there is that element of brutality that simply cannot be ignored. It is very violent. It is also very intricate and very exciting. The "bigger" man does not always win. Techique means something. Perhpas it is the carnal nature of man to enjoy this kind of thing? I don't know. I am not a violent person by nature. I do not start fights although I have been in a few in my day. I have been beat up pretty good, too! HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In my younger days, I considered myself a rather "tough" individual but those days are LONG gone.  In any event, I am not ashamed to admit that I like the UFC. On occasion, I pay for a fight.  It may not be a dignified part of me, but it is the truth! Edited at: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:50:28 AM

beaurocracy.  the scourge of the earth.

		Bev wrote:
		beaurocracy ... some are better at being political (full ranking officials), some are better at getting it done (level just below), someone owed someone a favor (lowest of three levels).      Head banger wrote: yes, but why?      ronhartsell wrote: Lieutenant Colonel is subordinate to a full-bird Colonel...how about 4 types of General...Brigadier General, Major General, Lieutenant General and General...and then there's your 1st and 2nd Lieutenants...and I won't get into the different Sgts...      Head banger wrote: whats with the ranks that have 2 ranks in the name anyway?  sargent major, lt col, at least 2 of the general ranks.  WTF, if you need more ranks, get more words      Deep Freeze wrote: Full Bird or Lieutenant??... HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!      ronhartsell wrote: He may have a certain 'place' for the Romans, but was it not the Jews that 'handed' Him to the Romans?? As I, in my youth was a young Marine, I would suggest that Christ would at least be of higher rank than Colonel Sanders!!