| [K2M] Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:01:23 PM | |
|
yes. By recognizable. Classic songs forever touch your heart. THe music describes things you identify with from somewhere in your past. And the song will be a part of your mood from the day you heard it . these are songs you beleive with. [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Necroticist from Monday, September 28, 2009 5:39:33 PM)
| |
 |
Necroticist wrote: |
| |
Classic would be if u heard me play guitar on it...lol.
No - the trick is to play with 'Feeling' - u gotta put ur heart and soul into it to make a 'classic' |
Edited at: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:02:06 PM
Edited at: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:02:53 PM |
|
| [Necroticist] Monday, September 28, 2009 5:39:33 PM | |
|
Classic would be if u heard me play guitar on it...lol.
No - the trick is to play with 'Feeling' - u gotta put ur heart and soul into it to make a 'classic' |
|
| [K2M] Monday, September 28, 2009 5:17:12 PM | |
|
I agree. JD.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Saturday, September 26, 2009 3:35:00 PM)| | | J.D. DIAMOND wrote: | | I respectfully disagree K2M....just because a song has a mix of musical elements doesn't nessesarily make it recognizable to many and doesn't make it a classic....
I can think of a few tunes that have a mix of musical elements that everybody would agree are not "classics". I still think it is a number of opinions from the fan base.
| | | K2M wrote: | | | It is a mix of musical elements. This makes the song recognizable to many. This enables the song to be Timeless. |
|
|
|
| [gillymott-AccountClosed] Monday, September 28, 2009 6:46:15 AM | |
|
| A song that becomes 'classic' has to be timeless, ie., it is universally still as popular as when it was first heard by many for the first time? Take Priest's classic song 'Victim of Changes', one of their oldest songs, appeals to I think, all fans, especially when heard live in concert? |
|
| [J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, September 26, 2009 3:35:00 PM | |
|
I respectfully disagree K2M....just because a song has a mix of musical elements doesn't nessesarily make it recognizable to many and doesn't make it a classic....
I can think of a few tunes that have a mix of musical elements that everybody would agree are not "classics". I still think it is a number of opinions from the fan base.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by K2M from Friday, September 25, 2009 1:15:11 PM)| | | K2M wrote: | | | It is a mix of musical elements. This makes the song recognizable to many. This enables the song to be Timeless. |
|
|
| [K2M] Friday, September 25, 2009 1:15:11 PM | |
|
| It is a mix of musical elements. This makes the song recognizable to many. This enables the song to be Timeless. |
|
| [J.D. DIAMOND] Friday, September 25, 2009 4:04:47 AM | |
|
I believe its a cluster of opinions by the artist's fanbase. When we all heard the track "Hellrider"...we all knew instantly it was a classic.Why did the "majority" of all of us agree?
I don't know......hummm I guess if a song kicks that much ass and its hard to find someone that doesn't like the track...then thats a good indication its a "classic". |
|
| [Kiss of Evil] Friday, September 25, 2009 2:32:05 AM | |
|
Perhaps, nothing in particular!!! Only all of the above, as one GREAT POWER, gives a realy timeless hit!!!
Plus...blessing of the Lord!!!)))
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by ProwlerCub from Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:21:37 PM)| | | ProwlerCub wrote: | | | Ok just looking to get some interesting dialogue started about what do you feel makes a song classic or timeless? Is it vocals? Melodies? Solos? Lyrics? Let's discuss. |
|
|
| [Phantom A6] Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:35:18 PM | |
|
| It's the song self!! That's all!! |
|
| [ProwlerCub] Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:21:37 PM | |
|
| Ok just looking to get some interesting dialogue started about what do you feel makes a song classic or timeless? Is it vocals? Melodies? Solos? Lyrics? Let's discuss. |
|
