Technically, Scott is lightyears better than Holland, but I do get where your coming from with the feel that Holland had. Scott looks bored as shit haha.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Maple Syrup from Friday, February 06, 2009 2:36:38 PM)| |  | Maple Syrup wrote: | | ICM: Slow down on the what Priest could have been with Travis in the 80's thing. Holland was much more fluid and detailed than Travis. Listen to Travis play any of the Pre-Painkiller stuff and he does not have the thump nor does he play the parts with the same intensity as Holland. The Ripper, Desert Plains etc.. I'll take Holland anyday on the old stuff. Travis is all dry run sounding without the parts. Even when they did Devils Child on this past tour, Travis played it with no emotion like he has somewhere to go.. Do not compare the ERA's please!
MpleSyrp
| | | icecreamman wrote: | | You have to admit, if Scott was in Priest in the 80's some of their music would have been mind blowing!!! |
|
| 