Umm, not sure if that is a response to something I have related but, my dear, I can assure you I am NOT "hot" nor would I want to put you or anyone else through the trauma of "looking at " my ass...... HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guardian angel from Monday, January 18, 2010 9:01:30 PM)
guardian angel wrote:
Hey Freeze, if you're so hot, and you want us to look at your ass, then you might not want to wear that trenchcoat of yours....
Deep Freeze wrote:
That is such a great point, jj. I mean, the fact is there is VERY little in the way of "quality" music available. Too much pre-recorded, over-dubbed crap. There are only so many "I'm so hot, look at my ass" songs one can do before it becomes terribly redundant, no?
I have no idea how they decide what will be nominated but it is just ridiculous.
jimmyjames wrote:
This grammy nomination is a fucking joke. Dissident Aggressor was written and recorded in 1977. If your going to nominate someone for and award in 2010 the song should have been written in 2009. Obviously there can't be much good stuff out there these days if a 33 year old song is being nominated. Wonder if Elvis is up for any awards this year?
