[Eternal Servant] Monday, August 01, 2011 12:25:17 AM
What I meant "natural" is to think the message from JB was deleted because he didn't want it there.
Soap opera = drama = JB message-gate
Meanwhile I'll work on my English, you'll keep updating on that pendant situation.
Marathon man, not just lurk on the Q, post in the Q. How about that?
While the scenario you describe is, indeed, "natural" at the Q it has certainly not always been the case. You could certainly give as many examples as I could.
As for the rest of your message to me, I frankly don't understand what you are trying to say (save for forget the uhhh .... "soap" .... drama)? An English problem, to be sure. Believe me, though, I keep my soap on a rope so there is nothing to drop. LOL!
Board members: heads-up! The "Tipton pendant" is stil unavailable! (that help?!?)
Eternal Servant wrote:
In the Q, if someone else uses the account of another person, that action results in banning according to the past posts by those who were banned for that reason.
If it showed that the message was from JB, it's natural to think he himself decided not to show it in public.
Marathon man, forget this soap drama and tell the board members update on Tipton pendant and tour diary on his site.
guidogodoy wrote:
Not to stir shit, but how does anyone know JB himself deleted the post?
(that help?!?)