Got issues and concerns regarding Priest...do it here. Keep it out of the other rooms!
You do not have enough Respect Points to post in this topic.
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:26:47 PM
HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:39:42 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Freeze, George Carlin just called from up there (yes, there is "up there" and hes feeling like a total jerk). He wants his royalties, or else Joe Pesci will come round your place with a baseball bat.
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:40:58 PM
no, since its not popular, the cause can continue for years. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:19:55 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
You really did it? A pro government stance? First Freeze, now you... Next thing will be me saying that capitalism isnt so bad after all...
And sex isnt something I would rally against, if thats what you mean.
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:19:55 PM
You really did it? A pro government stance? First Freeze, now you... Next thing will be me saying that capitalism isnt so bad after all...
And sex isnt something I would rally against, if thats what you mean. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM)
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:05 PM)
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:39 PM
No, Im suggesting that the solution to the AIDS problem is less pleasant than solutions to other problems.
As for prostitution, I agree. I think that the Dutch have it the right way. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM)
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:05 PM
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM)
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:57 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:39:42 PM
Freeze, George Carlin just called from up there (yes, there is "up there" and hes feeling like a total jerk). He wants his royalties, or else Joe Pesci will come round your place with a baseball bat. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:57 PM
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:31:49 PM)
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:54 PM
Can you imagine how many meals all the money johns spend on hookers could buy? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by METAL MELTDOWN from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:31:51 PM)
METAL MELTDOWN wrote:
My heart is not bleeding for the children abroad but for the children on our neck of the forest but I think it could be that a child cannot fend for itself where as the 20 something hooker can...
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[METAL MELTDOWN] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:31:51 PM
My heart is not bleeding for the children abroad but for the children on our neck of the forest but I think it could be that a child cannot fend for itself where as the 20 something hooker can... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:31:49 PM
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids.... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bazookajoe_666] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:41:16 AM
It's pissing me off that school is boring as shit BUT I made a deal with myself not to skip anymore for a while and go to class.
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 7:16:31 AM
hais or nipples. after 6miles, nipples would be the least of my wories. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:03 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[Vaillant 3.0] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:46:20 PM
Do you WAANT to come back to my place, bouncy bouncy! I am no longer infected. (Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27:31 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Pfffff...after running that much, my nipples would be the least of my problems. They would probably come after the heart-attack I'll definitely suffer (along with my already-shin-splinted left leg).
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:42:32 PM
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:39:10 PM
My nipples explode with delight!
Do you WAANT to come back to my place, bouncy bouncy! I am no longer infected. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27:31 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Pfffff...after running that much, my nipples would be the least of my problems. They would probably come after the heart-attack I'll definitely suffer (along with my already-shin-splinted left leg).
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:42:32 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27:31 PM
Pfffff...after running that much, my nipples would be the least of my problems. They would probably come after the heart-attack I'll definitely suffer (along with my already-shin-splinted left leg). [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:03 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:25:03 PM
You know, I didn't like that movie. I own it and LOVED "Shawn of the Dead" but that was just too goofy.
Had promise but devolved into a chick-flick, nonsense "hit too close to home" film. Anyone who runs marathons would understand just how bad that movie was. Like either could get to the "elite" group. She WAS a hottie, though.... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by devils_child from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:38:44 PM)
devils_child wrote:
Vaseline?.... Isn't that what the guy used in Run Fatboy Run?..... Or you can run shirtless... that would be easier.... and ....sexier.....
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:03 PM
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
