Still got the tape in a box somewhere but my version is on cd. LPs are definately the best for artwork and aesthetics (is that how you spell it ) for sure. Got a record player but it's not set up. Have a few records, Got Priests Rocka Rolla on LP, the one with the bottle top and the one with the futruristic warrior or what ever he is, also Sad Wings on LP and AC/DC Highway and Back In Black, plus a few others, haven't listened to them for years and years.
guidogodoy wrote:
Ah...I hope you have the LP. That is a great loss, I am afraid. While a cassette, CD or even digital might be better in sound, nothing beats holding a work of art in your hands as in an LP. Still own them, still collect them, still have a workable turntable.
jimmyjames wrote:
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
guidogodoy wrote:
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[jimmyjames] Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:23:21 PM
Those are cool, are they normally hanging up? Never really been an LP collector myself, got cassettes when I was a kid and went to cds from there. My older cousins have truckloads of LPs from the 70s and 80s, should raid their collections and see what's in there. Bound to be a few cool ones. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:06:55 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Sad you missed that gen. I value my LPs almost as much as my guitars. I hosted a college metal radio show for years and framed more than one. As I have said before, I can still say where the skips were in DOTF.
Picture LPs. Nothing better.
jimmyjames wrote:
Still got the tape in a box somewhere but my version is on cd. LPs are definately the best for artwork and aesthetics (is that how you spell it ) for sure. Got a record player but it's not set up. Have a few records, Got Priests Rocka Rolla on LP, the one with the bottle top and the one with the futruristic warrior or what ever he is, also Sad Wings on LP and AC/DC Highway and Back In Black, plus a few others, haven't listened to them for years and years.
guidogodoy wrote:
Ah...I hope you have the LP. That is a great loss, I am afraid. While a cassette, CD or even digital might be better in sound, nothing beats holding a work of art in your hands as in an LP. Still own them, still collect them, still have a workable turntable.
jimmyjames wrote:
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
guidogodoy wrote:
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Still got the tape in a box somewhere but my version is on cd. LPs are definately the best for artwork and aesthetics (is that how you spell it ) for sure. Got a record player but it's not set up. Have a few records, Got Priests Rocka Rolla on LP, the one with the bottle top and the one with the futruristic warrior or what ever he is, also Sad Wings on LP and AC/DC Highway and Back In Black, plus a few others, haven't listened to them for years and years.
guidogodoy wrote:
Ah...I hope you have the LP. That is a great loss, I am afraid. While a cassette, CD or even digital might be better in sound, nothing beats holding a work of art in your hands as in an LP. Still own them, still collect them, still have a workable turntable.
jimmyjames wrote:
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
guidogodoy wrote:
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[Becks] Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:19:00 PM
SFV was $20 UITE was $25. Rocka Rolla was I think $35. This shop also had Priest Live for about $20-25, and a japanese single thing for $40 which looked cool. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:17:20 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
Not sure, I've had them for ages. I didn't buy them. Don't know how rare they are or how much they cost. How much were your ones?
Becks wrote:
Is the Rocka Rolla LP hard to find here JJ? I found a copy at a record shop in Petone which made me go LOL! Didn't but it cos I could only afford a couple so I bought SFV and UITE instead.
My father in law has all the Maiden LPs I think, next time we visit I should see if I can get my hands on them lol, just for the artwork alone. I agree about the Somwhere in Time artwork, it kicks ass!
jimmyjames wrote:
Still got the tape in a box somewhere but my version is on cd. LPs are definately the best for artwork and aesthetics (is that how you spell it ) for sure. Got a record player but it's not set up. Have a few records, Got Priests Rocka Rolla on LP, the one with the bottle top and the one with the futruristic warrior or what ever he is, also Sad Wings on LP and AC/DC Highway and Back In Black, plus a few others, haven't listened to them for years and years.
guidogodoy wrote:
Ah...I hope you have the LP. That is a great loss, I am afraid. While a cassette, CD or even digital might be better in sound, nothing beats holding a work of art in your hands as in an LP. Still own them, still collect them, still have a workable turntable.
jimmyjames wrote:
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
guidogodoy wrote:
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[jimmyjames] Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:17:20 PM
Not sure, I've had them for ages. I didn't buy them. Don't know how rare they are or how much they cost. How much were your ones?
Is the Rocka Rolla LP hard to find here JJ? I found a copy at a record shop in Petone which made me go LOL! Didn't but it cos I could only afford a couple so I bought SFV and UITE instead.
My father in law has all the Maiden LPs I think, next time we visit I should see if I can get my hands on them lol, just for the artwork alone. I agree about the Somwhere in Time artwork, it kicks ass!
jimmyjames wrote:
Still got the tape in a box somewhere but my version is on cd. LPs are definately the best for artwork and aesthetics (is that how you spell it ) for sure. Got a record player but it's not set up. Have a few records, Got Priests Rocka Rolla on LP, the one with the bottle top and the one with the futruristic warrior or what ever he is, also Sad Wings on LP and AC/DC Highway and Back In Black, plus a few others, haven't listened to them for years and years.
guidogodoy wrote:
Ah...I hope you have the LP. That is a great loss, I am afraid. While a cassette, CD or even digital might be better in sound, nothing beats holding a work of art in your hands as in an LP. Still own them, still collect them, still have a workable turntable.
jimmyjames wrote:
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
guidogodoy wrote:
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:06:55 PM
Sad you missed that gen. I value my LPs almost as much as my guitars. I hosted a college metal radio show for years and framed more than one. As I have said before, I can still say where the skips were in DOTF.
Still got the tape in a box somewhere but my version is on cd. LPs are definately the best for artwork and aesthetics (is that how you spell it ) for sure. Got a record player but it's not set up. Have a few records, Got Priests Rocka Rolla on LP, the one with the bottle top and the one with the futruristic warrior or what ever he is, also Sad Wings on LP and AC/DC Highway and Back In Black, plus a few others, haven't listened to them for years and years.
guidogodoy wrote:
Ah...I hope you have the LP. That is a great loss, I am afraid. While a cassette, CD or even digital might be better in sound, nothing beats holding a work of art in your hands as in an LP. Still own them, still collect them, still have a workable turntable.
jimmyjames wrote:
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
guidogodoy wrote:
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[Becks] Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:01:53 PM
Is the Rocka Rolla LP hard to find here JJ? I found a copy at a record shop in Petone which made me go LOL! Didn't but it cos I could only afford a couple so I bought SFV and UITE instead.
My father in law has all the Maiden LPs I think, next time we visit I should see if I can get my hands on them lol, just for the artwork alone. I agree about the Somwhere in Time artwork, it kicks ass! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:51:19 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
Still got the tape in a box somewhere but my version is on cd. LPs are definately the best for artwork and aesthetics (is that how you spell it ) for sure. Got a record player but it's not set up. Have a few records, Got Priests Rocka Rolla on LP, the one with the bottle top and the one with the futruristic warrior or what ever he is, also Sad Wings on LP and AC/DC Highway and Back In Black, plus a few others, haven't listened to them for years and years.
guidogodoy wrote:
Ah...I hope you have the LP. That is a great loss, I am afraid. While a cassette, CD or even digital might be better in sound, nothing beats holding a work of art in your hands as in an LP. Still own them, still collect them, still have a workable turntable.
jimmyjames wrote:
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
guidogodoy wrote:
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[jimmyjames] Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:51:19 PM
Still got the tape in a box somewhere but my version is on cd. LPs are definately the best for artwork and aesthetics (is that how you spell it ) for sure. Got a record player but it's not set up. Have a few records, Got Priests Rocka Rolla on LP, the one with the bottle top and the one with the futruristic warrior or what ever he is, also Sad Wings on LP and AC/DC Highway and Back In Black, plus a few others, haven't listened to them for years and years. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:43:45 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Ah...I hope you have the LP. That is a great loss, I am afraid. While a cassette, CD or even digital might be better in sound, nothing beats holding a work of art in your hands as in an LP. Still own them, still collect them, still have a workable turntable.
jimmyjames wrote:
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
guidogodoy wrote:
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:43:45 PM
Ah...I hope you have the LP. That is a great loss, I am afraid. While a cassette, CD or even digital might be better in sound, nothing beats holding a work of art in your hands as in an LP. Still own them, still collect them, still have a workable turntable. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:38:09 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
guidogodoy wrote:
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[jimmyjames] Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:38:09 PM
It was the first Iron Maiden album I ever owned. A guy at school gave it to me on cassette when I was about 12 or 13.
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
jimmyjames wrote:
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:19:56 PM
I also applaud you for having a friggin' OPINION! Not a pure fanboy who stands by everything. Hell, I have never once said that I am not a Maiden fan but I can't stand their recent material. Not as bad as Metallica but close. IMO, Priest just leaves them in the dust.
Also, I agree with your assessment of "Somewhere." I love some of those songs and, as you said, the artwork is without compare. 'Blade Runner.' While I am a long distance runner, I can't stand the song, however. Sea of Madness, eh.... not my fav. Wasted years and Caught Somewhere in Time are my big favs. Still, I could stare at that artwork forever.
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[jimmyjames] Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:09:52 PM
Somewhere In Time is the most under-rated Maiden album. I don't think it has a weak track. Some people might say De Ja Vu, Sea Of Madness or The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner are not that great but I reckon they are cool songs. It also has top notch cover artwork and three songs that are Maiden classics, Wasted Years, Stranger In A Strange Land and Heaven Can Wait.
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
jimmyjames wrote:
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[Brian_Evans] Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:15:53 PM
The power of three.
Iron Maiden made a excellent decision by keeping Janick Gers after the return of Adrian Smith to form a three guitar attack.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:47:57 PM
WOW. I'm impressed...somebody who isn't afraid of listing Iron Maiden albums however I am utterly "shocked" at how you list Somewhere In Time over Killers,Piece Of mind,Iron Maiden and Powerslave....from 1986 when it came out till now I'm still trying to figure out what is good about this album I can't take any of it,not even one song but I must have to say to each his own. At least this is "an opinion" and your not saying "oh gaga everything they do is equally excellent". I agree that AMOLAD is boring,even though I do like most of it it isn't anywhere near,not even near thier first 5 studio albums(1980 - 1984).
Whats also interesting is your first 7 albums listed are all from the 1980's and my first 6 albums are also from the 1980's and the rest is all rated as "aeh..ok" to "shit" from both our opionions. I can't even fathom how many people/fans have said the same thing year after year that the 80's material is the band's best and everything else is "ah...ok I guess"...everybody nowadays just wants to see the band "live" because they can't "get anything special" out of thier albums from 1990 till now,they just can't get anything they want from these less than average albums.
I'd like to see how many people would go see Iron Maiden if they were to only play songs from the shitty albums from 1990 No Prayer For The Dying to now with A Matter Of life And Death"...1990 - 2006 no "Number Of The Beast" song no nothing just those albums from 1990 to 2006,I'm sure they would still pack em' in because of how many fan boys out there but I'd still bet there wouldn't be as many people excited about it.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. )
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[jimmyjames] Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:19:55 PM
Ok, I wouldn't really call it a challenge though.
Number Of The Beast ( awesome )
Somewhere In Time ( awesome )
Killers ( awesome )
Piece Of Mind ( agree about Quest For Fire and don't really like To Tame A Land either )
Powerslave ( Solid but the good songs aren't as good as the good songs on POM )
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son ( Great all round album, a touch mellodramatic )
Iron Maiden ( This and Seventh Son I rate equally )
Fear Of The Dark ( Not bad, 7/10 )
Dance Of Death ( A few good songs )
Brave New World ( A few good songs , I rate this and Dance Of Death equally )
No Prayer For The Dying ( Boring )
A Matter Of Life And Death ( Long and boring )
X Factor ( Crap )
Virtual XI ( haven't even heard it because X factor was so crap. ) [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:50:24 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:18:54 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:02:55 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:50:24 PM
Hey jimmy,since "you know what your talking about"...why don't "YOU" list your favorite Iron Maiden studio albums from the best album to the most shit album and you have to list if you like the album or not,this has nothing to do with the baby fanboy but I'm just courious what your ratings would be,so are you up for the challange since you seem to know just about everything or are you afraid of what your fanboy will say? I say you will "chicken out".....
Heres mine:
Killers - exellent
Iron Maiden-excellent
The Number Of The Beast-excellent
Piece Of Mind -excellent except for Quest For Fire the shit song
Powerslave-awsome except for The Duellists shit song
Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son -good album except for The Evil That Men Do crappy song
A Matter Of Life And Death -fair album except for Different World and Benjamim Bragg shit songs
Brave New World -half "ok" half shit album
Somewhere In Time-poor album
Fear Of The Dark- shit album except for the song Be Quick Or Be Dead that song is awsome on a shit album
No Prayer For The Dying -shit album except for Mother Russia that track is good
Dance Of Death - horrible shitty record I hate it all
Virtual Eleven-total SHIT
The X Factor - total SHIT
Well step up mr.major in the english language.... lets see where you stand on Iron Maiden's discography...
And to the fanboy...we need nothing from you as remember..this thread is for serious Iron Maiden discussions" as you haven't added one aspect of anything serious about the band yet lol!!!
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question.
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
[Phantom A6] Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:12:49 AM
No, not "Iron Lady".
The German translation of Iron Maiden is "Eiserne Jungfrau".
"Maid" is a word in the language of "Old-German" and means "Virgin"."Schwachmat" is a german phrase
(colloquial language) of "Gehirnamputiert".
A fucktard is an awkward, stupid person that causes harm.
It's a short term for: "fucking retard".
"Schwachmatenkram" - "Kram" means "Stuff".
My posting wasn't an insulting one but all the same postings from the
others all the time are boring totally!! It's not worth to read it.
Just my $0,02.[Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:52:00 PM)
spapad wrote:
HA!! Phantom. I Binged you and while it sounds very broken in direct english I get the point! lol
Bing's horrible translation to follow:Somehow it all can be again and again only one same of you. Boring! Let times what new thought you!
The expert and lovers of iron lady. But time is in some cosy corner and pimpert you times each other to correctly by. Apparently missing you in this respect what quite huge.
Then, you need no longer read this Schwachmatenkram of you!
Phantom A6 wrote:
Irgendwie könnt ihr alle immer und immer wieder nur ein und
dasselbe von Euch geben. Langweilig!! Laßt Euch mal was neues einfallen!!
Der Experte und der Liebhaber der Eisernen Jungfrau. Geht doch mal
in irgendeine gemütliche Ecke und pimpert Euch mal gegenseitig so richtig
durch. Anscheinend fehlt Euch in dieser Hinsicht was ganz gewaltig.
Dann braucht man auch diesen Schwachmatenkram von Euch hier nicht
mehr lesen!!
Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:15:40 AM Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:16:10 AM
[Brian_Evans] Thursday, March 25, 2010 8:30:22 AM
Check this joker out..
J.D. Diamond wrote: " he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it"
Your argument is a complete disaster and failure man. Baha!! Why? Because I never said that, ever,you know it, I know it, and everyone else knows it. You can argue until you're blue in the face and in the end you're still wrong. Show me where I wrote that and I will agree with you 100%. But the problem is you can't.
JIMMMJAMES wrote: "To me there is a difference between should have and must have" He hit the nail right on the head but for some reason you just can't see it. You hit a brick wall man so just admit it and move on. Ever seen the movie "My Cousin Vinny", you remind me of that goofy lawyer on there..
bahaaaaaa!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:35:43 PM) Edited at: Thursday, March 25, 2010 8:36:27 AM
[MARK IN THE DARK] Thursday, March 25, 2010 5:03:33 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:21:29 PM
LOL! Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. You obviously don't know what your even talking about so I'll lay this un-needed conversation to rest,you need to learn what your talking about before you question. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 4:32:29 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
[spapad] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:52:00 PM
HA!! Phantom. I Binged you and while it sounds very broken in direct english I get the point! lol
Bing's horrible translation to follow:
Somehow it all can be again and again only one same of you. Boring! Let times what new thought you!
The expert and lovers of iron lady. But time is in some cosy corner and pimpert you times each other to correctly by. Apparently missing you in this respect what quite huge.
Then, you need no longer read this Schwachmatenkram of you! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Phantom A6 from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:32:11 PM)
Phantom A6 wrote:
Irgendwie könnt ihr alle immer und immer wieder nur ein und
dasselbe von Euch geben. Langweilig!! Laßt Euch mal was neues einfallen!!
Der Experte und der Liebhaber der Eisernen Jungfrau. Geht doch mal
in irgendeine gemütliche Ecke und pimpert Euch mal gegenseitig so richtig
durch. Anscheinend fehlt Euch in dieser Hinsicht was ganz gewaltig.
Dann braucht man auch diesen Schwachmatenkram von Euch hier nicht
mehr lesen!!
[Phantom A6] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:32:11 PM
Irgendwie könnt ihr alle immer und immer wieder nur ein und
dasselbe von Euch geben. Langweilig!! Laßt Euch mal was neues einfallen!!
Der Experte und der Liebhaber der Eisernen Jungfrau. Geht doch mal
in irgendeine gemütliche Ecke und pimpert Euch mal gegenseitig so richtig
durch. Anscheinend fehlt Euch in dieser Hinsicht was ganz gewaltig.
Dann braucht man auch diesen Schwachmatenkram von Euch hier nicht
mehr lesen!!
[jimmyjames] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 4:52:51 PM
This is one of my favourite Maiden songs. So cool.
[jimmyjames] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 4:32:29 PM
So you are being anal about the way the sentence was structured? Maybe he didn't say it the "correct" way but I understood perfectly what Brian was getting at and I'm sure you did too. You're just looking for a fight because you don't like Brian.
PS. You are extremely anal about everything to do with metal.
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Think about it. lol!
(Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:22:02 PM
LOL! Ha ha,thats not correct jimmy as you and Brian are not understanding what these statements actually mean in a stuctured sentence.I'm not being "anal" about anything jimmy,Brian has contradicted himself and I just called him out on it,no need for you to worry about it,but we will "agree to disagree" thats all.
And I'm not the Maiden fanboy,you should dedicate that Twilight Zone song to Brian...after all,any other song by any other band that did not have a guitar solo in it is considered "not good" but if its an Iron Maiden song than it "is good" and doesn't really need one. HA!
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "What every goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:26:58 PM
[jimmyjames] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:39:23 PM
To make up for disappointing you I will play Twilight Zone on my show next week and dedicate to you.
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:13:31 PM
[jimmyjames] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:20:16 PM
So what you're saying is that you are being anal about the way the sentence is structured and are deliberately misunderstanding what was meant in an attempt to continue this Brian bashing. If you look at Brians response to my second post on the subject he said "exactly". To me there is a difference between should have and must have, to you, maybe not. I did not get the impression from Brians post that he was adamant that an excellent solo was compulsory for a song to be a good metal song. If you did then you must have misunderstood the post because Brian already said that my take on it was what he meant. There's nothing to argue about. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:00:23 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:13:31 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:00:23 PM
No jimmy,I'm afraid your wrong on this one pal.He said every track should have one to be "good". Your not understanding the meanings of these sentences,look them up and you will find I'm right. Your confusing the words should and has together,look them up in sentences and depending on how its used they are showing what I'm saying is absolutely correct. We'll have to agree to disagree,no problem but he just basically said that the song Twilight Zone is not a "good" track unless it had an 'excellent" guitar solo in it, the word "good" in the sentence is why I'm right,had he worded it another way then you'd be right....
Its not that hard to understand,I'm disappointed in you jimmy hahahaha!!!!
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:13:31 PM
[jimmyjames] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:52:56 PM
JD, he didn't say every great song "has" to have a great solo. What you think he was saying and what he said are two different things. You are wrong on this one. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:36:41 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
LOL! Fuckin contradictional fanboy! LOL! Gotcha!
Brian_Evans wrote:
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM) Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:44:01 AM Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:49:16 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:36:41 PM
Brian Evans wrote March 1st in you tube videos thread: Bathory formed in 1983. Ha! 1983? HaHaHA!! Thats too funny! Where's the good guitar solo? No way these guys can compete with the masters like Iron Maiden
(lol!) Oh ok,so you laugh at Bathory for not playing a guitar solo but its ok if Iron maiden doesn't play a guitar solo in the song Twilight Zone?
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM) Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:44:01 AM Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:49:16 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:35:43 PM
Brian Evans wrote today: "And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good"
Brian Evans wrote: "Whatevery goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
Ah but by saying "every good" metal track should have an excellent guitar solo in it you are 100% saying that "all" metal tracks must contain this "excellent guitar solos in them to be good". This is where you and jimmy james are grossly incorrect.Look up the definitions of each in sentences and you will find I'm 100% correct. In other words when you say "should have" you are implying that unless this track does not have a guitar solo in it then it is not a "good" metal track.
Brian Evans wrote: "Whatevery goodmetal track should have is an excellent guitar solo"
So what about "Twilight Zone" from Iron Maiden Brian,it doesn't have a guitar solo in it at all.
so what you are saying is that Twilight Zone is not a good metal track unless it had an excellent guitar solo in it.
You need to take a course in logic before opening up your hole to me little Maiden fanboy,and of course I stumped you big time dude,haha everybody who reads this can easily see it.
You are a walking contradiction dude and I've just proved it,your just to fucking stupid to read it and understand it,maybe your parents failed you as a child? lol! Fuckin Maiden fanboy dork.
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM)
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:01:51 PM
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:21:24 AM
I find it interesting that Priest fans defend POE saying that the songs sound great live. WTF? its not the same song. add some solos, speed it up, its different. look at diamonds and rust. not quite the same as the Joan Baez song is it.
[Brian_Evans] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:39:59 AM
"And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track."
I didn't shy away from anything. You're just grasping at straws here and you probably don't even know how to play chess. The bass solo thing I said was just a joke. Although Steve Harris does more in that track than most bass players do in ten. Twlight Zone is a solid metal track. And I never said all metal tracks had to have a solo in it to be good. Read the post five more times and maybe just maybe(fingers crossed) you will finally catch on. You can't stump me man, give it up and go back to your littie Saxon cave of a thread. You're out of your element here.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM) Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:44:01 AM Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:49:16 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:21:48 AM
Brian Evans wrote:Twilight Zone basically has a bass solo all the way through it. Steve Harris is excellent! Ha!
Auh ha! You've been stumped dude,that aint no "bass solo" lol!! And Twilight Zone doesn't have a "good guitar solo" in it,only some bends that an unexperienced guitarist could easily do. And yeah I knew you would throw the live versions of the JP tunes,thats why I posted what I posted for you to shy away from the Iron Maiden Twilight Zone non-guitar solo track. Face it,since Iron Maiden has the song Twilight Zone,not every song "should" have an excellent guitar solo.
Your a contradiction walking my friend.
Check mate. LOFL!!!! "Bass solo"?? HAHAHA!! Please,if that is a bass solo thats the weakest bass solo in the history of rock/metal. Oh did I say check mate? Oh yeah,I did....
Here's a live video of "Heading Out To The Highway" and what is that I hear in there.. could it be, a guitar solo. Dual guitar solo. Hmmmm, wonder why they added that? Could it be because it made the song even better? Did you hear it????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6zaxZ0j_70
Here's "Breaking The Law" live from recent British Steel Tour and again what is that I hear in there, another guitar solo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47HnFvb_NVk
Why did they add that? Just for kicks? Are you going to go argue with Glenn Tipton and K.K. Downing and tell them that they ruined the song with that solo? Well if you do, let me know how that goes over.
United
Take on the World
Love Bites
Would have been better with solos but still good metal tracks. Although United seems like a copy of Take on the World.
Twilight Zone basically has a bass solo all the way through it. Steve Harris is excellent! Ha! (Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:22:16 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote: "What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo".
I "disagree" fully. What every good "heavy metal" track should have is an excellent guitar solo. As you don't know the black metal thrash metal or death metal genre/scene,you don't understand these styles of metal so you need to type "heavy" before typing "metal" when you talk about having these needed guitar solos. Guitar solos do not fit in every song of every style of "metal" at all no matter what rubbish you can come up with here Brian.
The fact is that they don't belong in every song of every style of "metal".This is the area where your extremely weak at understanding.Its like asking why isn't there any guitar solos in most punk?
What about Breaking The Law and what about "Take On The World" by JP...they do not have a guitar solo in them,are they not good? What about United? No guitar solo in it.
Or how about Love Bites Brian? Love Bites does NOT have a guitar solo in it,only harmony bends that couldn't come close to be considered a "guitar solo"...so is Love Bites lame becaise of your philosophy?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:12:03 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:31:40 AM
[spapad] Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:04:49 PM
Oh my, let's go back to green eyed lady over that acid induced piece to sh*t! I hate that song! I remember hearing the shortened version of it on radio as a kid and even THAT was too fucking long!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:41:48 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
LOL!!!!! No, not long nor plodding. Compared with what, I might ask? BWWAHAAHAAAAAA!!!
Brian_Evans wrote:
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Yeah but he said "should" and I agree in a sense. He didn't say every great metal track "does" have an excellent solo. He's not saying there aren't any great songs without solos, he just thinks they should have them.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Thier not favorites of mine either jimmy but its the point that I'm addressing here. I however do think Heading Out To The Highway "IS" a great track with harmony bends,not "good guitar solos" and I do think "Twilight Zone" by Iron Maiden is a great track with harmony bends not guitar solos.
So by Brian saying "every good metal track should have an excellent guitar solo in it".....well Twilight Zone doesn't have an "excellent" guitar solo in it as it hardly has a solo in it at all,so what he is saying is that the Twilight Zone track is not a "good" track and at the same time he claims every Iron Maiden track to be top notch equal to "any" Iron Maiden song ever written....he is caught in a squeeze play between 3rd and home....in other words hes now got to be extremely careful the way he answers this post because he will be caught in a "contradiction".
jimmyjames wrote:
These are not great examples JD. Take On The World and United are two of the weakest songs Priest have ever released in my opinion. I hate those songs. I also find Breaking The Law boring as hell as well. Love Bites is ok but not one of DOTFs best songs. I actually kind of agree with both Brian and yourself on this one. I think a true metal song should have some kind of shredding guitar solo in it somewhere but like you say, lots of bands do fine without them, especially in some of the sub-genres of metal. Bands who have made their name with deadly soloing and shredding should always continue in that vein, then we would never have albums like St Anger thrust upon us.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote: "What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo".
I "disagree" fully. What every good "heavy metal" track should have is an excellent guitar solo. As you don't know the black metal thrash metal or death metal genre/scene,you don't understand these styles of metal so you need to type "heavy" before typing "metal" when you talk about having these needed guitar solos. Guitar solos do not fit in every song of every style of "metal" at all no matter what rubbish you can come up with here Brian.
The fact is that they don't belong in every song of every style of "metal".This is the area where your extremely weak at understanding.Its like asking why isn't there any guitar solos in most punk?
What about Breaking The Law and what about "Take On The World" by JP...they do not have a guitar solo in them,are they not good? What about United? No guitar solo in it.
Or how about Love Bites Brian? Love Bites does NOT have a guitar solo in it,only harmony bends that couldn't come close to be considered a "guitar solo"...so is Love Bites lame becaise of your philosophy?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:12:03 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:53:33 AM
[Brian_Evans] Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:51:50 PM
Here's a live video of "Heading Out To The Highway" and what is that I hear in there.. could it be, a guitar solo. Dual guitar solo. Hmmmm, wonder why they added that? Could it be because it made the song even better? Did you hear it????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6zaxZ0j_70
Here's "Breaking The Law" live from recent British Steel Tour and again what is that I hear in there, another guitar solo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47HnFvb_NVk
Why did they add that? Just for kicks? Are you going to go argue with Glenn Tipton and K.K. Downing and tell them that they ruined the song with that solo? Well if you do, let me know how that goes over.
United
Take on the World
Love Bites
Would have been better with solos but still good metal tracks. Although United seems like a copy of Take on the World.
Twilight Zone basically has a bass solo all the way through it. Steve Harris is excellent! Ha! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:22:16 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote: "What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo".
I "disagree" fully. What every good "heavy metal" track should have is an excellent guitar solo. As you don't know the black metal thrash metal or death metal genre/scene,you don't understand these styles of metal so you need to type "heavy" before typing "metal" when you talk about having these needed guitar solos. Guitar solos do not fit in every song of every style of "metal" at all no matter what rubbish you can come up with here Brian.
The fact is that they don't belong in every song of every style of "metal".This is the area where your extremely weak at understanding.Its like asking why isn't there any guitar solos in most punk?
What about Breaking The Law and what about "Take On The World" by JP...they do not have a guitar solo in them,are they not good? What about United? No guitar solo in it.
Or how about Love Bites Brian? Love Bites does NOT have a guitar solo in it,only harmony bends that couldn't come close to be considered a "guitar solo"...so is Love Bites lame becaise of your philosophy?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:12:03 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:53:33 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:55:51 PM
[jimmyjames] Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:31:00 PM
Yeah but he said "should" and I agree in a sense. He didn't say every great metal track "does" have an excellent solo. He's not saying there aren't any great songs without solos, he just thinks they should have them. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:18:27 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Thier not favorites of mine either jimmy but its the point that I'm addressing here. I however do think Heading Out To The Highway "IS" a great track with harmony bends,not "good guitar solos" and I do think "Twilight Zone" by Iron Maiden is a great track with harmony bends not guitar solos.
So by Brian saying "every good metal track should have an excellent guitar solo in it".....well Twilight Zone doesn't have an "excellent" guitar solo in it as it hardly has a solo in it at all,so what he is saying is that the Twilight Zone track is not a "good" track and at the same time he claims every Iron Maiden track to be top notch equal to "any" Iron Maiden song ever written....he is caught in a squeeze play between 3rd and home....in other words hes now got to be extremely careful the way he answers this post because he will be caught in a "contradiction".
jimmyjames wrote:
These are not great examples JD. Take On The World and United are two of the weakest songs Priest have ever released in my opinion. I hate those songs. I also find Breaking The Law boring as hell as well. Love Bites is ok but not one of DOTFs best songs. I actually kind of agree with both Brian and yourself on this one. I think a true metal song should have some kind of shredding guitar solo in it somewhere but like you say, lots of bands do fine without them, especially in some of the sub-genres of metal. Bands who have made their name with deadly soloing and shredding should always continue in that vein, then we would never have albums like St Anger thrust upon us.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote: "What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo".
I "disagree" fully. What every good "heavy metal" track should have is an excellent guitar solo. As you don't know the black metal thrash metal or death metal genre/scene,you don't understand these styles of metal so you need to type "heavy" before typing "metal" when you talk about having these needed guitar solos. Guitar solos do not fit in every song of every style of "metal" at all no matter what rubbish you can come up with here Brian.
The fact is that they don't belong in every song of every style of "metal".This is the area where your extremely weak at understanding.Its like asking why isn't there any guitar solos in most punk?
What about Breaking The Law and what about "Take On The World" by JP...they do not have a guitar solo in them,are they not good? What about United? No guitar solo in it.
Or how about Love Bites Brian? Love Bites does NOT have a guitar solo in it,only harmony bends that couldn't come close to be considered a "guitar solo"...so is Love Bites lame becaise of your philosophy?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:12:03 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:53:33 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:18:27 PM
Thier not favorites of mine either jimmy but its the point that I'm addressing here. I however do think Heading Out To The Highway "IS" a great track with harmony bends,not "good guitar solos" and I do think "Twilight Zone" by Iron Maiden is a great track with harmony bends not guitar solos.
So by Brian saying "every good metal track should have an excellent guitar solo in it".....well Twilight Zone doesn't have an "excellent" guitar solo in it as it hardly has a solo in it at all,so what he is saying is that the Twilight Zone track is not a "good" track and at the same time he claims every Iron Maiden track to be top notch equal to "any" Iron Maiden song ever written....he is caught in a squeeze play between 3rd and home....in other words hes now got to be extremely careful the way he answers this post because he will be caught in a "contradiction". [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:02:50 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
These are not great examples JD. Take On The World and United are two of the weakest songs Priest have ever released in my opinion. I hate those songs. I also find Breaking The Law boring as hell as well. Love Bites is ok but not one of DOTFs best songs. I actually kind of agree with both Brian and yourself on this one. I think a true metal song should have some kind of shredding guitar solo in it somewhere but like you say, lots of bands do fine without them, especially in some of the sub-genres of metal. Bands who have made their name with deadly soloing and shredding should always continue in that vein, then we would never have albums like St Anger thrust upon us.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote: "What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo".
I "disagree" fully. What every good "heavy metal" track should have is an excellent guitar solo. As you don't know the black metal thrash metal or death metal genre/scene,you don't understand these styles of metal so you need to type "heavy" before typing "metal" when you talk about having these needed guitar solos. Guitar solos do not fit in every song of every style of "metal" at all no matter what rubbish you can come up with here Brian.
The fact is that they don't belong in every song of every style of "metal".This is the area where your extremely weak at understanding.Its like asking why isn't there any guitar solos in most punk?
What about Breaking The Law and what about "Take On The World" by JP...they do not have a guitar solo in them,are they not good? What about United? No guitar solo in it.
Or how about Love Bites Brian? Love Bites does NOT have a guitar solo in it,only harmony bends that couldn't come close to be considered a "guitar solo"...so is Love Bites lame becaise of your philosophy?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:12:03 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:53:33 AM
[jimmyjames] Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:02:50 PM
These are not great examples JD. Take On The World and United are two of the weakest songs Priest have ever released in my opinion. I hate those songs. I also find Breaking The Law boring as hell as well. Love Bites is ok but not one of DOTFs best songs. I actually kind of agree with both Brian and yourself on this one. I think a true metal song should have some kind of shredding guitar solo in it somewhere but like you say, lots of bands do fine without them, especially in some of the sub-genres of metal. Bands who have made their name with deadly soloing and shredding should always continue in that vein, then we would never have albums like St Anger thrust upon us. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:22:16 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Brian Evans wrote: "What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo".
I "disagree" fully. What every good "heavy metal" track should have is an excellent guitar solo. As you don't know the black metal thrash metal or death metal genre/scene,you don't understand these styles of metal so you need to type "heavy" before typing "metal" when you talk about having these needed guitar solos. Guitar solos do not fit in every song of every style of "metal" at all no matter what rubbish you can come up with here Brian.
The fact is that they don't belong in every song of every style of "metal".This is the area where your extremely weak at understanding.Its like asking why isn't there any guitar solos in most punk?
What about Breaking The Law and what about "Take On The World" by JP...they do not have a guitar solo in them,are they not good? What about United? No guitar solo in it.
Or how about Love Bites Brian? Love Bites does NOT have a guitar solo in it,only harmony bends that couldn't come close to be considered a "guitar solo"...so is Love Bites lame becaise of your philosophy?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:12:03 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:53:33 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Tuesday, March 23, 2010 2:08:18 AM
Or even how about "Twilight Zone" by your one and only Iron Maiden Brian,those guitars what you hear are not solos,they are harmony bends and harmony bends are a far cry from what you are calling "good solo" as you think every "good metal song" should have "good solos" in them......"Heading Out To The Highway" doesn't have "good solos " in it,only harmony bends....
Give Twilight Zone from the Killers album a listen and you will find no "good" solos in them......
So what are you trying to say? That the song "Twilight Zone" is not a "good" metal track? There DEFINATELY is no guitar solos in it,only easy bends any unexperienced guitar player could easily do so whats your answer for this and all the other tracks I've listed with no "good" guitar solos in it?
Brian Evans wrote: "What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo".
I "disagree" fully. What every good "heavy metal" track should have is an excellent guitar solo. As you don't know the black metal thrash metal or death metal genre/scene,you don't understand these styles of metal so you need to type "heavy" before typing "metal" when you talk about having these needed guitar solos. Guitar solos do not fit in every song of every style of "metal" at all no matter what rubbish you can come up with here Brian.
The fact is that they don't belong in every song of every style of "metal".This is the area where your extremely weak at understanding.Its like asking why isn't there any guitar solos in most punk?
What about Breaking The Law and what about "Take On The World" by JP...they do not have a guitar solo in them,are they not good? What about United? No guitar solo in it.
Or how about Love Bites Brian? Love Bites does NOT have a guitar solo in it,only harmony bends that couldn't come close to be considered a "guitar solo"...so is Love Bites lame becaise of your philosophy?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:12:03 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 2:14:18 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:22:16 AM
Brian Evans wrote: "What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo".
I "disagree" fully. What every good "heavy metal" track should have is an excellent guitar solo. As you don't know the black metal thrash metal or death metal genre/scene,you don't understand these styles of metal so you need to type "heavy" before typing "metal" when you talk about having these needed guitar solos. Guitar solos do not fit in every song of every style of "metal" at all no matter what rubbish you can come up with here Brian.
The fact is that they don't belong in every song of every style of "metal".This is the area where your extremely weak at understanding.Its like asking why isn't there any guitar solos in most punk?
What about Breaking The Law and what about "Take On The World" by JP...they do not have a guitar solo in them,are they not good? What about United? No guitar solo in it.
Or how about Love Bites Brian? Love Bites does NOT have a guitar solo in it,only harmony bends that couldn't come close to be considered a "guitar solo"...so is Love Bites lame becaise of your philosophy?
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:53:33 AM
[guidogodoy] Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:41:48 PM
LOL!!!!! No, not long nor plodding. Compared with what, I might ask? BWWAHAAHAAAAAA!!!
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick!
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Saturday, March 20, 2010 11:20:08 AM
[Brian_Evans] Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:12:03 PM
Long?? Plodding?? Predictable?? Whatever. You just don't know good metal when you hear it. Ha!
Nice Rainmaker video, I listened to the part between 2:05 and 2:28 about 50 times! What every good metal track should have is an excellent guitar solo. Murray is sick! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, March 21, 2010 9:07:36 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Yeah that song is excellent.
Here's a good live version
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song.
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Saturday, March 20, 2010 11:20:08 AM
[guidogodoy] Sunday, March 21, 2010 9:07:36 PM
Bleah. Long, plodding, predictable.
I try. I really do. Just wasted 7+ minutes of my life, though. I am all for Nosta against anything Maiden has done of late save for one....with the goofy video.
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Saturday, March 20, 2010 11:20:08 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:08:10 PM
The Longest Day,an excellent Iron maiden song. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Saturday, March 20, 2010 11:19:07 AM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Saturday, March 20, 2010 11:20:08 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:04:50 PM
Yeah your right,its all about opinions,mine is no different as I don't have the final say in anything,its simply only my opinion.The new album may be awsome,who knows.Saxon released thier single "Live To Rock" last year before the album(Into The Labyrinth)was released and I HATED it and still do.
"Live To Rock" is a boring lame weak song that sucks and I was heavily disappointed,it sounds like a washed up bad-era-Saxon track and I think the band could of come up with something better.But the rest of the album is a good Saxon LP...well I forgot to add "Hell Cat" that song SUCKS lol! But the album has 13 tracks on it and 2 of them utterly suck so 11 tracks is enough to make a great album.
A Matter Of Life And Death is a great album with 10 songs on it there are only 2 tracks that I do not like and its the same senario as when Saxon released Live To Rock as I don't like Maiden's first 2 tracks they released to the fans "Different World" and "Benjamin Bragg" and I was disappointed with them.
But the other 8 songs I really like,those 8 songs although they are a little bit progressive but in a great way done right they remind me of material from Piece Of Mind and Powerslave. The Pilgrim for example could of been on the Powerslave album and in my opinion Out Of The Shadows sounds more Piece Of Mind than The Number Of The Beast to me as Piece Of Mind is one of my favorite Iron Maiden albums.
The Longest Day is excellent and is "underrated" in my opinion,the lyrics to that song are brilliant and over-looked. I think that A Matter Of Life And Death is the best Iron Maiden album since 1988 Seventh Son album but to others they don't like it,its all opinions and again mine isn't the final say.
How about this...I wish I liked Brave New Worlds and Dance Of Death as much as I like A Matter Of Life And Death but I just don't. And your right about the last 2 albums by both bands as Maiden definately topped Priest with AMOLAD over Nostradamus,easily. I just hope I'm wrong about the new Maiden album,I don't want to be let down as I've been a fan since 1982.
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:20:06 PM
[Brian_Evans] Saturday, March 20, 2010 11:19:07 AM
Out of the Shadows from the 2006 "A Matter Of Life and Death" album. This sounds just as good as older Maiden and if you ask me it could have easily come from 1982's "The Number Of the Beast" album. Same quality vocals, drums, guitars, songwriting, ect.
Edited at: Saturday, March 20, 2010 11:20:08 AM
[Brian_Evans] Saturday, March 20, 2010 11:02:17 AM
Well thats just your opinion man about Maiden loosing a step. And even if the people at your job think old Maiden is so much better doesn't mean everyone thinks that way. And thats enough of the "Star Trek" cracks. Just because the new album is named "The Final Frontier" doesn't mean it has anything to do with Star Trek. Understand? And I'm not saying that Iron Maiden is better than Judas Priest but if you look at the last album of each Iron Maiden clearly won that round with "A Matter OF Life And Death" over "Nostradamus". And the way things are going Iron Maiden will release The Final Frontier and maybe even start another album before Judas Priest get their new one out. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:29:53 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
!! Ah ha ha,well your right about some things...it does have not "good" vocals but "great" vocals and it has TOP notch guitar solos,excellent bass by the best bass player on the planet hands down,great drums by Nicko but you can keep on thinking that this track sounds like a cross between Hallowed Be Thy Name and The Trooper because I already know I'm not the only one who thinks it sounds NOTHING like those songs at all,that track in my opinion is an under-par song by what should be a great song writting band.
This is all opinions,nobody wins in the end but if we had a vote on this sounding like Hallowed Be Thy Name mixed with The Trooper I'd bet 98% of people would think that it certainly does not. You go ahead and love thier new stuff but I'm not the only one who thinks this band has lost a step.
Even people at my work who are not a part of this forum think that Iron Maiden's newer era material is definately not as good quality as thier 80's stuff,it is what is is guy,this also doesn't make these people right,oh no not at all,as I said its all opinions.If you like the newer Maiden stuff then it "IS" great in your mind case closed.But if you want to talk about percentages then at least I'd probably say that 85% of people do not care for thier newer stuff,it just is what it is.
Same with Judas Priest man although Angel Of Retribution kicks ass and is to me the band's 5th best album of all time,many people think that thier best work is from 1976 to 1990 as the Ripper albums and Nostradamus doesn't come close.Jackylone would beg to differ with us I know(lol!) but the truth is that the majority of people like the older stuff.
The big match up is comparing the new Iron Maiden album "The Final Frontier" with the next Judas Priest album and let me tell you that I don't think Iron Maiden is going to beat Judas Priest on an opinon percentage with thier next LP and I don't think the band plans on doing another Nostradamus so Maiden is probably and I underline "probably" going to be crushed to death by this next Judas Priest studio album.Priest can come out of nowhere and thump the heaviest album you've ever heard while there is NO WAY Iron Maiden is capable of doing this Brian.
Brian_Evans wrote:
"another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like"
Hmmmm, folk song, thats interesting but it sounds like Maiden to me. I'm scratching my head on this one man. Folk song? Ha!! This thing has it all, good vocals, good solo, fast, slow. What else do you want?This is like a cross between Hallowed beThy Name and the Trooper. Doesn't get much better.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HRMG & Becks,I agree.... Jimmy James I agree with the themes are not bad,the lyrics are not bad,the song titles are not bad but this music dude...this music...heres another one.."Dream Of Mirrors" from the half good half bad Brave New World album,another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:41:51 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, March 20, 2010 2:22:37 AM
Well its all about an individual's opinion but in my opinion I think Iron Maiden should of done an old classic album like The Number Of The Beast in its entirety or Piece Of Mind just like Priest is doing with British Steel and I would also not want to hear Nostradamus in its entirety either,I just think it takes time maybe 10 years or so to see if an albums going to bloom into a classic by the opinions of the long time fans or not before they decide to play an entire album live but thats just my take on it.This would give the band a better idea of the majority of what fans want to hear or not to hear. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by soccer star from Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:54:47 AM)
soccer star wrote:
I second that !! lol..
Both Maiden and Priest (in my opinion) released their best stuff in the 80s/early 90s. Yes there have been some magic moments since but if both bands only played their 'later' songs on the next tour most fans would be
pissed off.Maiden had this problem when they played 'A Matter Of Life And Death' start to finish, i know a lot of fans didn't like it but i thought it was a good idea.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, March 20, 2010 2:15:38 AM
I agree Becks,the name of the new album 'The Final Frontier" sounds like a Star Trek idea,Star Trek had this title for years and even to this day when somebody says The Final Frontier...the only thing you think about is the Star Trek tv series with "Space.....The Final Frontier.....These are the voyagers of the Star Trek Enterprise....ect..ect... so it is not a good idea from the start to have this title.
It could be worse but still,its not a good idea especially if there is indeed a song called "Where No Man Has Gone Before" as those words are at the end of the opening Star Trek narration : "To Boldly Go Where No Man Has Gone Before" HAHA! And if that track is the actually title "Murky Space Race"?? That sounds like a level 3 of a Bugs Bunny video game!! lol!!!
And the track title "Longing For Heaven" sounds tame lame pssive and weak,not trying to bring anyones religion into this(another thread for that HA!lol!)but for a heavy metal band "Longing For Heaven" is weak and tame,we don't want to hear about any of this we want something "cool". I'll bet these song titles are the real ones....we'll see.
Well said JD - Priest can come just about out of nowhere with a crazy awesome heavy metal monster! There was the craziness (for lack of a better term) of the Turbo and Ram It Down albums, then along came a little thing called PAINKILLER and it kicked everyones eardrums in to the next dimension. It'll be interesting to see what this next Maiden album will be like - more of what they've done the last few albums, or will they go back to the earlier sound? I do hope they come out with something awesome, but even just the album title alone has already raised a few eyebrows. I reckon Priest will come out with something better than Maiden too, I'm keeping the JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY METAL FAITH!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
!! Ah ha ha,well your right about some things...it does have not "good" vocals but "great" vocals and it has TOP notch guitar solos,excellent bass by the best bass player on the planet hands down,great drums by Nicko but you can keep on thinking that this track sounds like a cross between Hallowed Be Thy Name and The Trooper because I already know I'm not the only one who thinks it sounds NOTHING like those songs at all,that track in my opinion is an under-par song by what should be a great song writting band.
This is all opinions,nobody wins in the end but if we had a vote on this sounding like Hallowed Be Thy Name mixed with The Trooper I'd bet 98% of people would think that it certainly does not. You go ahead and love thier new stuff but I'm not the only one who thinks this band has lost a step.
Even people at my work who are not a part of this forum think that Iron Maiden's newer era material is definately not as good quality as thier 80's stuff,it is what is is guy,this also doesn't make these people right,oh no not at all,as I said its all opinions.If you like the newer Maiden stuff then it "IS" great in your mind case closed.But if you want to talk about percentages then at least I'd probably say that 85% of people do not care for thier newer stuff,it just is what it is.
Same with Judas Priest man although Angel Of Retribution kicks ass and is to me the band's 5th best album of all time,many people think that thier best work is from 1976 to 1990 as the Ripper albums and Nostradamus doesn't come close.Jackylone would beg to differ with us I know(lol!) but the truth is that the majority of people like the older stuff.
The big match up is comparing the new Iron Maiden album "The Final Frontier" with the next Judas Priest album and let me tell you that I don't think Iron Maiden is going to beat Judas Priest on an opinon percentage with thier next LP and I don't think the band plans on doing another Nostradamus so Maiden is probably and I underline "probably" going to be crushed to death by this next Judas Priest studio album.Priest can come out of nowhere and thump the heaviest album you've ever heard while there is NO WAY Iron Maiden is capable of doing this Brian.
Brian_Evans wrote:
"another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like"
Hmmmm, folk song, thats interesting but it sounds like Maiden to me. I'm scratching my head on this one man. Folk song? Ha!! This thing has it all, good vocals, good solo, fast, slow. What else do you want?This is like a cross between Hallowed beThy Name and the Trooper. Doesn't get much better.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HRMG & Becks,I agree.... Jimmy James I agree with the themes are not bad,the lyrics are not bad,the song titles are not bad but this music dude...this music...heres another one.."Dream Of Mirrors" from the half good half bad Brave New World album,another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:41:51 PM
[soccer star] Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:54:47 AM
I second that !! lol..
Both Maiden and Priest (in my opinion) released their best stuff in the 80s/early 90s. Yes there have been some magic moments since but if both bands only played their 'later' songs on the next tour most fans would be
pissed off.Maiden had this problem when they played 'A Matter Of Life And Death' start to finish, i know a lot of fans didn't like it but i thought it was a good idea.
[Becks] Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:51:04 AM
Well said JD - Priest can come just about out of nowhere with a crazy awesome heavy metal monster! There was the craziness (for lack of a better term) of the Turbo and Ram It Down albums, then along came a little thing called PAINKILLER and it kicked everyones eardrums in to the next dimension. It'll be interesting to see what this next Maiden album will be like - more of what they've done the last few albums, or will they go back to the earlier sound? I do hope they come out with something awesome, but even just the album title alone has already raised a few eyebrows. I reckon Priest will come out with something better than Maiden too, I'm keeping the JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY METAL FAITH! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:29:53 AM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
!! Ah ha ha,well your right about some things...it does have not "good" vocals but "great" vocals and it has TOP notch guitar solos,excellent bass by the best bass player on the planet hands down,great drums by Nicko but you can keep on thinking that this track sounds like a cross between Hallowed Be Thy Name and The Trooper because I already know I'm not the only one who thinks it sounds NOTHING like those songs at all,that track in my opinion is an under-par song by what should be a great song writting band.
This is all opinions,nobody wins in the end but if we had a vote on this sounding like Hallowed Be Thy Name mixed with The Trooper I'd bet 98% of people would think that it certainly does not. You go ahead and love thier new stuff but I'm not the only one who thinks this band has lost a step.
Even people at my work who are not a part of this forum think that Iron Maiden's newer era material is definately not as good quality as thier 80's stuff,it is what is is guy,this also doesn't make these people right,oh no not at all,as I said its all opinions.If you like the newer Maiden stuff then it "IS" great in your mind case closed.But if you want to talk about percentages then at least I'd probably say that 85% of people do not care for thier newer stuff,it just is what it is.
Same with Judas Priest man although Angel Of Retribution kicks ass and is to me the band's 5th best album of all time,many people think that thier best work is from 1976 to 1990 as the Ripper albums and Nostradamus doesn't come close.Jackylone would beg to differ with us I know(lol!) but the truth is that the majority of people like the older stuff.
The big match up is comparing the new Iron Maiden album "The Final Frontier" with the next Judas Priest album and let me tell you that I don't think Iron Maiden is going to beat Judas Priest on an opinon percentage with thier next LP and I don't think the band plans on doing another Nostradamus so Maiden is probably and I underline "probably" going to be crushed to death by this next Judas Priest studio album.Priest can come out of nowhere and thump the heaviest album you've ever heard while there is NO WAY Iron Maiden is capable of doing this Brian.
Brian_Evans wrote:
"another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like"
Hmmmm, folk song, thats interesting but it sounds like Maiden to me. I'm scratching my head on this one man. Folk song? Ha!! This thing has it all, good vocals, good solo, fast, slow. What else do you want?This is like a cross between Hallowed beThy Name and the Trooper. Doesn't get much better.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HRMG & Becks,I agree.... Jimmy James I agree with the themes are not bad,the lyrics are not bad,the song titles are not bad but this music dude...this music...heres another one.."Dream Of Mirrors" from the half good half bad Brave New World album,another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:41:51 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, March 20, 2010 1:29:53 AM
!! Ah ha ha,well your right about some things...it does have not "good" vocals but "great" vocals and it has TOP notch guitar solos,excellent bass by the best bass player on the planet hands down,great drums by Nicko but you can keep on thinking that this track sounds like a cross between Hallowed Be Thy Name and The Trooper because I already know I'm not the only one who thinks it sounds NOTHING like those songs at all,that track in my opinion is an under-par song by what should be a great song writting band.
This is all opinions,nobody wins in the end but if we had a vote on this sounding like Hallowed Be Thy Name mixed with The Trooper I'd bet 98% of people would think that it certainly does not. You go ahead and love thier new stuff but I'm not the only one who thinks this band has lost a step.
Even people at my work who are not a part of this forum think that Iron Maiden's newer era material is definately not as good quality as thier 80's stuff,it is what is is guy,this also doesn't make these people right,oh no not at all,as I said its all opinions.If you like the newer Maiden stuff then it "IS" great in your mind case closed.But if you want to talk about percentages then at least I'd probably say that 85% of people do not care for thier newer stuff,it just is what it is.
Same with Judas Priest man although Angel Of Retribution kicks ass and is to me the band's 5th best album of all time,many people think that thier best work is from 1976 to 1990 as the Ripper albums and Nostradamus doesn't come close.Jackylone would beg to differ with us I know(lol!) but the truth is that the majority of people like the older stuff.
The big match up is comparing the new Iron Maiden album "The Final Frontier" with the next Judas Priest album and let me tell you that I don't think Iron Maiden is going to beat Judas Priest on an opinon percentage with thier next LP and I don't think the band plans on doing another Nostradamus so Maiden is probably and I underline "probably" going to be crushed to death by this next Judas Priest studio album.Priest can come out of nowhere and thump the heaviest album you've ever heard while there is NO WAY Iron Maiden is capable of doing this Brian.
"another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like"
Hmmmm, folk song, thats interesting but it sounds like Maiden to me. I'm scratching my head on this one man. Folk song? Ha!! This thing has it all, good vocals, good solo, fast, slow. What else do you want?This is like a cross between Hallowed beThy Name and the Trooper. Doesn't get much better.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HRMG & Becks,I agree.... Jimmy James I agree with the themes are not bad,the lyrics are not bad,the song titles are not bad but this music dude...this music...heres another one.."Dream Of Mirrors" from the half good half bad Brave New World album,another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:41:51 PM
[Brian_Evans] Friday, March 19, 2010 10:00:51 PM
"another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like"
Hmmmm, folk song, thats interesting but it sounds like Maiden to me. I'm scratching my head on this one man. Folk song? Ha!! This thing has it all, good vocals, good solo, fast, slow. What else do you want?This is like a cross between Hallowed beThy Name and the Trooper. Doesn't get much better. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Friday, March 19, 2010 1:37:59 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HRMG & Becks,I agree.... Jimmy James I agree with the themes are not bad,the lyrics are not bad,the song titles are not bad but this music dude...this music...heres another one.."Dream Of Mirrors" from the half good half bad Brave New World album,another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:41:51 PM
[hellrider 31038] Friday, March 19, 2010 4:32:04 PM
HEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL YEEEEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH MY METAL SISTER
JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY MEEETTT TTTAAALLLL AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Fucken oath JD! Priest is the best heavy metal band in the world, EVER!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Old Iron Maiden is good,new era Saxon is good but heres a band that kicks both Iron Maiden and Saxon's ass combined together with no question,Judas Priest's music is 10 times as great as any other band its magical and unbeatable but I'm sure Mr.Evans will disagree with this even though he is on our forum HA!
That song is too damn long. I'd rather listen to this one! Only six minutes long, but so much better!!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Really? Then how come this doesn't sound like anything close to ...well....."Iron Maiden'? As a matter of fact,everybody should click on this track and give it a listen,this to my ears doesn't sound anything close to Iron Maiden,it sounds like a folk song dude,and even if it doesn't sound like Maiden it still is a terrible song,this is quality Iron Maiden to you?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Friday, March 19, 2010 12:02:48 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
They do but for some reason you just can't hear it.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore?
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:05:58 PM
[Becks] Friday, March 19, 2010 4:16:38 PM
Fucken oath JD! Priest is the best heavy metal band in the world, EVER! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Friday, March 19, 2010 1:56:55 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Old Iron Maiden is good,new era Saxon is good but heres a band that kicks both Iron Maiden and Saxon's ass combined together with no question,Judas Priest's music is 10 times as great as any other band its magical and unbeatable but I'm sure Mr.Evans will disagree with this even though he is on our forum HA!
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:58:42 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Friday, March 19, 2010 3:58:42 PM
Hmmmm...
That song is too damn long. I'd rather listen to this one! Only six minutes long, but so much better!!
Really? Then how come this doesn't sound like anything close to ...well....."Iron Maiden'? As a matter of fact,everybody should click on this track and give it a listen,this to my ears doesn't sound anything close to Iron Maiden,it sounds like a folk song dude,and even if it doesn't sound like Maiden it still is a terrible song,this is quality Iron Maiden to you?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Friday, March 19, 2010 12:02:48 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
They do but for some reason you just can't hear it.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore?
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:05:58 PM
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Friday, March 19, 2010 2:00:59 PM
I couldn't agree with you more J.D.! PRIEST RULES!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Friday, March 19, 2010 1:56:55 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Old Iron Maiden is good,new era Saxon is good but heres a band that kicks both Iron Maiden and Saxon's ass combined together with no question,Judas Priest's music is 10 times as great as any other band its magical and unbeatable but I'm sure Mr.Evans will disagree with this even though he is on our forum HA!
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:58:42 PM
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Friday, March 19, 2010 1:58:43 PM
Sorry Jimmy, I didn't mean they should write about world peace or world hunger..... HELL NO! I meant sex, rock -n- roll, things they care about. But this has always been their thing and I accept that. I just don't accept how musically it doesn't get me going. Now old Maiden - now we are talkin'! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Friday, March 19, 2010 1:36:32 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
There's nothing wrong with Maidens themes. Leave the "issue" music to wankstains like Bono.
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
And THIS is exactly why I don't listen to "new" Maiden!!! Jesus, now I'm gonna have to crank up some REAL METAL!!!! I just have one question, is Maiden capable of writing about REAL LIFE issues or does Bruce just stick a finger in a mythology or history book and say, yeah, I'll write about this? And these 8 minute songs, don't even get me started on that!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Really? Then how come this doesn't sound like anything close to ...well....."Iron Maiden'? As a matter of fact,everybody should click on this track and give it a listen,this to my ears doesn't sound anything close to Iron Maiden,it sounds like a folk song dude,and even if it doesn't sound like Maiden it still is a terrible song,this is quality Iron Maiden to you?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Friday, March 19, 2010 12:02:48 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
They do but for some reason you just can't hear it.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore?
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:05:58 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Friday, March 19, 2010 1:56:55 PM
Old Iron Maiden is good,new era Saxon is good but heres a band that kicks both Iron Maiden and Saxon's ass combined together with no question,Judas Priest's music is 10 times as great as any other band its magical and unbeatable but I'm sure Mr.Evans will disagree with this even though he is on our forum HA!
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:58:42 PM
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Friday, March 19, 2010 1:43:21 PM
Aaaah, now that's better Becks! This gets the blood flowing and the fists pumping! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Becks from Friday, March 19, 2010 1:24:14 PM)
Becks wrote:
It does have a folksy feel to it doesn't it.
Here's some decent Maiden! Well I think it is miles better than Dance of Death anyways LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Really? Then how come this doesn't sound like anything close to ...well....."Iron Maiden'? As a matter of fact,everybody should click on this track and give it a listen,this to my ears doesn't sound anything close to Iron Maiden,it sounds like a folk song dude,and even if it doesn't sound like Maiden it still is a terrible song,this is quality Iron Maiden to you?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Friday, March 19, 2010 12:02:48 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
They do but for some reason you just can't hear it.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore?
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:05:58 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Friday, March 19, 2010 1:37:59 PM
HRMG & Becks,I agree.... Jimmy James I agree with the themes are not bad,the lyrics are not bad,the song titles are not bad but this music dude...this music...heres another one.."Dream Of Mirrors" from the half good half bad Brave New World album,another folk song that doesn't sound anything like Iron Maiden should sound like.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:41:51 PM
[jimmyjames] Friday, March 19, 2010 1:36:32 PM
There's nothing wrong with Maidens themes. Leave the "issue" music to wankstains like Bono. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS from Friday, March 19, 2010 1:18:34 PM)
HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS wrote:
And THIS is exactly why I don't listen to "new" Maiden!!! Jesus, now I'm gonna have to crank up some REAL METAL!!!! I just have one question, is Maiden capable of writing about REAL LIFE issues or does Bruce just stick a finger in a mythology or history book and say, yeah, I'll write about this? And these 8 minute songs, don't even get me started on that!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Really? Then how come this doesn't sound like anything close to ...well....."Iron Maiden'? As a matter of fact,everybody should click on this track and give it a listen,this to my ears doesn't sound anything close to Iron Maiden,it sounds like a folk song dude,and even if it doesn't sound like Maiden it still is a terrible song,this is quality Iron Maiden to you?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Friday, March 19, 2010 12:02:48 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
They do but for some reason you just can't hear it.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore?
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:05:58 PM
[Becks] Friday, March 19, 2010 1:24:14 PM
It does have a folksy feel to it doesn't it.
Here's some decent Maiden! Well I think it is miles better than Dance of Death anyways LOL!
Really? Then how come this doesn't sound like anything close to ...well....."Iron Maiden'? As a matter of fact,everybody should click on this track and give it a listen,this to my ears doesn't sound anything close to Iron Maiden,it sounds like a folk song dude,and even if it doesn't sound like Maiden it still is a terrible song,this is quality Iron Maiden to you?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Friday, March 19, 2010 12:02:48 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
They do but for some reason you just can't hear it.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore?
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:05:58 PM
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Friday, March 19, 2010 1:18:34 PM
And THIS is exactly why I don't listen to "new" Maiden!!! Jesus, now I'm gonna have to crank up some REAL METAL!!!! I just have one question, is Maiden capable of writing about REAL LIFE issues or does Bruce just stick a finger in a mythology or history book and say, yeah, I'll write about this? And these 8 minute songs, don't even get me started on that! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Friday, March 19, 2010 1:03:03 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Really? Then how come this doesn't sound like anything close to ...well....."Iron Maiden'? As a matter of fact,everybody should click on this track and give it a listen,this to my ears doesn't sound anything close to Iron Maiden,it sounds like a folk song dude,and even if it doesn't sound like Maiden it still is a terrible song,this is quality Iron Maiden to you?
(Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Friday, March 19, 2010 12:02:48 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
They do but for some reason you just can't hear it.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore?
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:05:58 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Friday, March 19, 2010 1:03:03 PM
Really? Then how come this doesn't sound like anything close to ...well....."Iron Maiden'? As a matter of fact,everybody should click on this track and give it a listen,this to my ears doesn't sound anything close to Iron Maiden,it sounds like a folk song dude,and even if it doesn't sound like Maiden it still is a terrible song,this is quality Iron Maiden to you?
They do but for some reason you just can't hear it.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore?
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy.
Edited at: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:05:58 PM
[Brian_Evans] Friday, March 19, 2010 12:02:48 PM
They do but for some reason you just can't hear it. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Thursday, March 18, 2010 3:49:22 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore?
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy. Edited at: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 7:47:31 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Thursday, March 18, 2010 3:49:22 PM
Ah,Moonchild from the last good(all the way through)album from Iron Maiden! Now,why can't they write music like this anymore? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:34:06 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
Awesome.
Brian_Evans wrote:
A little Moonchild for ya! From Maidens seventh studio album, Seventh Son of a Seventh Son. Enjoy. Edited at: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 7:47:31 PM
[Brian_Evans] Wednesday, March 17, 2010 7:35:12 PM
Wasted Years from the Somewhere In Time CD.
[hellrider 31038] Monday, March 15, 2010 9:04:55 PM
HELL YEAH.did you put your fist to mine on the screen METAL SISTER [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Monday, March 15, 2010 6:33:29 PM)
spapad wrote:
I'm With ya Brother Hellllrridderrr!!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
HEEEELLLLLLL YEEEEEAAAAHHHHHHHH MY METAL SISTER.LETS PUT OUR FIST TOGETHER
JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY MEEETTT TTTAAALLLL.AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
(Quoting Message by spapad from Friday, March 12, 2010 4:44:16 PM)
spapad wrote:
YES CAPTIAN HELLRIDER!!!! I CRASHED that plane and it was wonderful! LOL
hellrider 31038 wrote:
JUST MAKING SURE METAL SISTER SPAPAD YOU FOLLOWED MY ORDER AND CRASHED THAT PLANE.
spapad wrote:
Will try it Captain HELLLLLLLLRIDDERRRR!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
hey Spapad .lol.just up past the clouds and when coming down make sure to hit the arrow pointing up when coming down for more speed for the crash.HEEELLLLLLLL YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
spapad wrote:
You mean you can actually fly the plane into space?? Maybe I should try to crash the plane a few more times.
hellrider 31038 wrote:
i took it into space past those clouds then got it coming strait down then pressed on the arrow pointing up for more speed.lol
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
I'm With ya Brother Hellllrridderrr!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Friday, March 12, 2010 6:48:07 PM)
hellrider 31038 wrote:
HEEEELLLLLLL YEEEEEAAAAHHHHHHHH MY METAL SISTER.LETS PUT OUR FIST TOGETHER
JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY MEEETTT TTTAAALLLL.AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
(Quoting Message by spapad from Friday, March 12, 2010 4:44:16 PM)
spapad wrote:
YES CAPTIAN HELLRIDER!!!! I CRASHED that plane and it was wonderful! LOL
hellrider 31038 wrote:
JUST MAKING SURE METAL SISTER SPAPAD YOU FOLLOWED MY ORDER AND CRASHED THAT PLANE.
spapad wrote:
Will try it Captain HELLLLLLLLRIDDERRRR!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
hey Spapad .lol.just up past the clouds and when coming down make sure to hit the arrow pointing up when coming down for more speed for the crash.HEEELLLLLLLL YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
spapad wrote:
You mean you can actually fly the plane into space?? Maybe I should try to crash the plane a few more times.
hellrider 31038 wrote:
i took it into space past those clouds then got it coming strait down then pressed on the arrow pointing up for more speed.lol
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
YES CAPTIAN HELLRIDER!!!! I CRASHED that plane and it was wonderful! LOL
hellrider 31038 wrote:
JUST MAKING SURE METAL SISTER SPAPAD YOU FOLLOWED MY ORDER AND CRASHED THAT PLANE.
spapad wrote:
Will try it Captain HELLLLLLLLRIDDERRRR!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
hey Spapad .lol.just up past the clouds and when coming down make sure to hit the arrow pointing up when coming down for more speed for the crash.HEEELLLLLLLL YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
spapad wrote:
You mean you can actually fly the plane into space?? Maybe I should try to crash the plane a few more times.
hellrider 31038 wrote:
i took it into space past those clouds then got it coming strait down then pressed on the arrow pointing up for more speed.lol
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
YES CAPTIAN HELLRIDER!!!! I CRASHED that plane and it was wonderful! LOL [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:38:32 PM)
hellrider 31038 wrote:
JUST MAKING SURE METAL SISTER SPAPAD YOU FOLLOWED MY ORDER AND CRASHED THAT PLANE.
spapad wrote:
Will try it Captain HELLLLLLLLRIDDERRRR!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
hey Spapad .lol.just up past the clouds and when coming down make sure to hit the arrow pointing up when coming down for more speed for the crash.HEEELLLLLLLL YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
spapad wrote:
You mean you can actually fly the plane into space?? Maybe I should try to crash the plane a few more times.
hellrider 31038 wrote:
i took it into space past those clouds then got it coming strait down then pressed on the arrow pointing up for more speed.lol
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
[hellrider 31038] Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:38:32 PM
JUST MAKING SURE METAL SISTER SPAPAD YOU FOLLOWED MY ORDER AND CRASHED THAT PLANE. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Monday, March 08, 2010 3:31:28 PM)
spapad wrote:
Will try it Captain HELLLLLLLLRIDDERRRR!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
hey Spapad .lol.just up past the clouds and when coming down make sure to hit the arrow pointing up when coming down for more speed for the crash.HEEELLLLLLLL YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
spapad wrote:
You mean you can actually fly the plane into space?? Maybe I should try to crash the plane a few more times.
hellrider 31038 wrote:
i took it into space past those clouds then got it coming strait down then pressed on the arrow pointing up for more speed.lol
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
I am curious to see what Eddie looks like, if they still bring him out onstage. I know they did for SBIT tour but not sure about the previous tours since I did not get a chance to see them. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by acolyte55 from Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:12:58 PM)
acolyte55 wrote:
thx i will get some pics for you
[acolyte55] Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:12:58 PM
thx i will get some pics for you
[ProwlerCub] Wednesday, March 10, 2010 2:45:59 PM
Lucky you, enjoy the show. No Florida dates this time, maybe next summer. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by acolyte55 from Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:51:12 PM)
acolyte55 wrote:
got four tix on the floor vancouver show !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[acolyte55] Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:51:12 PM
got four tix on the floor vancouver show !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[hellrider 31038] Monday, March 08, 2010 4:45:56 PM
CRASH THAT PLANE NOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW ITS AN ORDER [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Monday, March 08, 2010 3:31:28 PM)
spapad wrote:
Will try it Captain HELLLLLLLLRIDDERRRR!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
hey Spapad .lol.just up past the clouds and when coming down make sure to hit the arrow pointing up when coming down for more speed for the crash.HEEELLLLLLLL YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
spapad wrote:
You mean you can actually fly the plane into space?? Maybe I should try to crash the plane a few more times.
hellrider 31038 wrote:
i took it into space past those clouds then got it coming strait down then pressed on the arrow pointing up for more speed.lol
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
Will try it Captain HELLLLLLLLRIDDERRRR!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Sunday, March 07, 2010 10:48:29 PM)
hellrider 31038 wrote:
hey Spapad .lol.just up past the clouds and when coming down make sure to hit the arrow pointing up when coming down for more speed for the crash.HEEELLLLLLLL YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
spapad wrote:
You mean you can actually fly the plane into space?? Maybe I should try to crash the plane a few more times.
hellrider 31038 wrote:
i took it into space past those clouds then got it coming strait down then pressed on the arrow pointing up for more speed.lol
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
[hellrider 31038] Sunday, March 07, 2010 10:48:29 PM
hey Spapad .lol.just up past the clouds and when coming down make sure to hit the arrow pointing up when coming down for more speed for the crash.HEEELLLLLLLL YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Sunday, March 07, 2010 7:58:38 PM)
spapad wrote:
You mean you can actually fly the plane into space?? Maybe I should try to crash the plane a few more times.
hellrider 31038 wrote:
i took it into space past those clouds then got it coming strait down then pressed on the arrow pointing up for more speed.lol
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
I thought so lol sounds very random that they have Iron Maiden shirts lol. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:21:30 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
JCPenney is a big department store usually found in malls.
Becks wrote:
LOL I'm not sure what JCPenney can be compared to here, but I get the idea what it must be like.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
It really surprised me when I went to a JCPenney earlier today to do some shopping and saw them while I was on my way to try some stuff. I can understand if they're being sold at a Swap Meet from a stand that sells Heavy Metal stuff, but JCPenney?? (Quoting Message by spapad from Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:07:22 PM)
spapad wrote:
That's a crack up isn't it! I've seen the "Vintage tees" in shopping with my daughter! She does not buy them bacause her Moma has the orginals. lol
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
OK, question: Is it a good thing to see Iron Maiden shirts, or any Heavy Metal band shirts in general, being sold at a JCPenney store?
Edited at: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:12:09 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:21:30 PM
JCPenney is a big department store usually found in malls. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Becks from Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:18:52 PM)
Becks wrote:
LOL I'm not sure what JCPenney can be compared to here, but I get the idea what it must be like.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
It really surprised me when I went to a JCPenney earlier today to do some shopping and saw them while I was on my way to try some stuff. I can understand if they're being sold at a Swap Meet from a stand that sells Heavy Metal stuff, but JCPenney?? (Quoting Message by spapad from Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:07:22 PM)
spapad wrote:
That's a crack up isn't it! I've seen the "Vintage tees" in shopping with my daughter! She does not buy them bacause her Moma has the orginals. lol
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
OK, question: Is it a good thing to see Iron Maiden shirts, or any Heavy Metal band shirts in general, being sold at a JCPenney store?
Edited at: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:12:09 PM
[Becks] Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:18:52 PM
LOL I'm not sure what JCPenney can be compared to here, but I get the idea what it must be like. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:11:26 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
It really surprised me when I went to a JCPenney earlier today to do some shopping and saw them while I was on my way to try some stuff. I can understand if they're being sold at a Swap Meet from a stand that sells Heavy Metal stuff, but JCPenney?? (Quoting Message by spapad from Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:07:22 PM)
spapad wrote:
That's a crack up isn't it! I've seen the "Vintage tees" in shopping with my daughter! She does not buy them bacause her Moma has the orginals. lol
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
OK, question: Is it a good thing to see Iron Maiden shirts, or any Heavy Metal band shirts in general, being sold at a JCPenney store?
Edited at: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:12:09 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:11:26 PM
It really surprised me when I went to a JCPenney earlier today to do some shopping and saw them while I was on my way to try some stuff. I can understand if they're being sold at a Swap Meet from a stand that sells Heavy Metal stuff, but JCPenney?? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:07:22 PM)
spapad wrote:
That's a crack up isn't it! I've seen the "Vintage tees" in shopping with my daughter! She does not buy them bacause her Moma has the orginals. lol
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
OK, question: Is it a good thing to see Iron Maiden shirts, or any Heavy Metal band shirts in general, being sold at a JCPenney store?
Edited at: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:12:09 PM
[spapad] Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:07:22 PM
That's a crack up isn't it! I've seen the "Vintage tees" in shopping with my daughter! She does not buy them bacause her Moma has the orginals. lol [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:05:37 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
OK, question: Is it a good thing to see Iron Maiden shirts, or any Heavy Metal band shirts in general, being sold at a JCPenney store?
[Vaillant 3.0] Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:05:37 PM
OK, question: Is it a good thing to see Iron Maiden shirts, or any Heavy Metal band shirts in general, being sold at a JCPenney store?
[spapad] Sunday, March 07, 2010 7:58:38 PM
You mean you can actually fly the plane into space?? Maybe I should try to crash the plane a few more times. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Saturday, March 06, 2010 5:35:59 PM)
hellrider 31038 wrote:
i took it into space past those clouds then got it coming strait down then pressed on the arrow pointing up for more speed.lol
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
Vail, it was my experiment to see how long the plane could fly with no help. To reach two minutes means it's a suck ass game! I should have crashed before 15 seconds! lol [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Saturday, March 06, 2010 10:07:00 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Spa, you have to control the plane ya know. Unlike regular ones, this virtual plane will go in a straight line until it runs out of fuel. Besides, forcing the plane to crash is much more fun.
spapad wrote:
I did absolutely nothing to control the plane and the damn thing took two minutes to crash!
guidogodoy wrote:
I've been playing it for weeks. Can't say that I haven't squished a Mexican or three with a speaker at the start!
Becks wrote:
What the heck? LOL! That's super random, haha. I crashed straight away, oh dear.
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hey, ladies and gents!! Check it out!! It's Flight 666...the game!! Now you can crash Iron Maiden's airplane all you want!!!
Whatever dude,if thats what makes you "feel better' than go for it .Its no skin off my nuts. 
LOL! Didn't but it cos I could only afford a couple so I bought SFV and UITE instead.
bahaaaaaa!!!! 
Jesus, now I'm gonna have to crank up some REAL METAL!!!! I just have one question, is Maiden capable of writing about REAL LIFE issues or does Bruce just stick a finger in a mythology or history book and say, yeah, I'll write about this? And these 8 minute songs, don't even get me started on that! 
sounds very random that they have Iron Maiden shirts lol.