| [Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!!] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:57:47 PM | |
|
Isn't Roth like 55 now??
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:57:03 PM)| |  | Deep Freeze wrote: | | OLD??!?!?!?!? They are MY age!!!! HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | Guess we got await and see if an album actually does come out. It might be one of the chinese democracy deals, only this time somebody might pass away or something. There getting pretty old now.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | OH? Well, it is just my opinion, man. Really. They just don't do much for me right now. Same with Owens when he was with Priest. That music does NOT sound like Priest to me. Sounds WAY too "modern" and edgy to be Priest. Again, opinion.
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | Damn i hope not, at the show they were on fire man, honestly one of the best shows ive seen. They were talking about putting out a new album with Roth and i hope it goes through. That would rule!!! 20 years later....again with Roth!!! But who knows maybe we can blame it all on Eddie's kid Wolfgang, hahaha. Its all that little basterds fault!!! He was actually a pretty talented bassist for being in his early 20's i think maybe even younger.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! Oh, I do understand. I truly do.
Roth's voice is a big part of VH for me as well. It reminds me of their first couple albums. Eddie is a genius, I know that. He is great. but Roth and his style helped to define VH and they have not been the same without him. In fact, they are not the same WITH him anymore. The special something they had in '78 is gone, from what I have heard.
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | I agree, Sammy could blow away Roth in a singing contest. But I feel Roth is the right man for VH. He's got the act for the show, seeing them live with Roth was the VH i want to see again. By the way DF, i try and let it go, but certian people tend to grind my gears the wrong way, it really cheeses me off when people rip on Halford. He's the Metal God for crying out loud.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | To be very honest, I have never really considered DLR a "great vocalist" at all. I think he is a showman and a TREMENDOUS front man. An entertainer. A "pretty face" (years ago) that the ladies love. Vocally speaking, he is not all that good (as far as I am concerned) but he has that ability to work a crowd that makes him a great "Rock Front man". Hagar has far more vocal control and musicianship but I am not a fan of him at all.
Roth is more like Mick Jagger for me. Jagger is not a "great" vocalist , either. He is an accomplished showman. He also is a musical genius and I say that because he has the longevity to back it up! Anyway, to stay on "topic", I would vote Roth all the way. I enjoyed VH when they first hit the scene and stopped caring when Roth left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:57:03 PM | |
|
OLD??!?!?!?!? They are MY age!!!! HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:54:52 PM)| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | Guess we got await and see if an album actually does come out. It might be one of the chinese democracy deals, only this time somebody might pass away or something. There getting pretty old now.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | OH? Well, it is just my opinion, man. Really. They just don't do much for me right now. Same with Owens when he was with Priest. That music does NOT sound like Priest to me. Sounds WAY too "modern" and edgy to be Priest. Again, opinion.
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | Damn i hope not, at the show they were on fire man, honestly one of the best shows ive seen. They were talking about putting out a new album with Roth and i hope it goes through. That would rule!!! 20 years later....again with Roth!!! But who knows maybe we can blame it all on Eddie's kid Wolfgang, hahaha. Its all that little basterds fault!!! He was actually a pretty talented bassist for being in his early 20's i think maybe even younger.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! Oh, I do understand. I truly do.
Roth's voice is a big part of VH for me as well. It reminds me of their first couple albums. Eddie is a genius, I know that. He is great. but Roth and his style helped to define VH and they have not been the same without him. In fact, they are not the same WITH him anymore. The special something they had in '78 is gone, from what I have heard.
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | I agree, Sammy could blow away Roth in a singing contest. But I feel Roth is the right man for VH. He's got the act for the show, seeing them live with Roth was the VH i want to see again. By the way DF, i try and let it go, but certian people tend to grind my gears the wrong way, it really cheeses me off when people rip on Halford. He's the Metal God for crying out loud.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | To be very honest, I have never really considered DLR a "great vocalist" at all. I think he is a showman and a TREMENDOUS front man. An entertainer. A "pretty face" (years ago) that the ladies love. Vocally speaking, he is not all that good (as far as I am concerned) but he has that ability to work a crowd that makes him a great "Rock Front man". Hagar has far more vocal control and musicianship but I am not a fan of him at all.
Roth is more like Mick Jagger for me. Jagger is not a "great" vocalist , either. He is an accomplished showman. He also is a musical genius and I say that because he has the longevity to back it up! Anyway, to stay on "topic", I would vote Roth all the way. I enjoyed VH when they first hit the scene and stopped caring when Roth left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!!] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:54:52 PM | |
|
Guess we got await and see if an album actually does come out. It might be one of the chinese democracy deals, only this time somebody might pass away or something. There getting pretty old now.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:24:30 PM)| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | OH? Well, it is just my opinion, man. Really. They just don't do much for me right now. Same with Owens when he was with Priest. That music does NOT sound like Priest to me. Sounds WAY too "modern" and edgy to be Priest. Again, opinion.
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | Damn i hope not, at the show they were on fire man, honestly one of the best shows ive seen. They were talking about putting out a new album with Roth and i hope it goes through. That would rule!!! 20 years later....again with Roth!!! But who knows maybe we can blame it all on Eddie's kid Wolfgang, hahaha. Its all that little basterds fault!!! He was actually a pretty talented bassist for being in his early 20's i think maybe even younger.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! Oh, I do understand. I truly do.
Roth's voice is a big part of VH for me as well. It reminds me of their first couple albums. Eddie is a genius, I know that. He is great. but Roth and his style helped to define VH and they have not been the same without him. In fact, they are not the same WITH him anymore. The special something they had in '78 is gone, from what I have heard.
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | I agree, Sammy could blow away Roth in a singing contest. But I feel Roth is the right man for VH. He's got the act for the show, seeing them live with Roth was the VH i want to see again. By the way DF, i try and let it go, but certian people tend to grind my gears the wrong way, it really cheeses me off when people rip on Halford. He's the Metal God for crying out loud.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | To be very honest, I have never really considered DLR a "great vocalist" at all. I think he is a showman and a TREMENDOUS front man. An entertainer. A "pretty face" (years ago) that the ladies love. Vocally speaking, he is not all that good (as far as I am concerned) but he has that ability to work a crowd that makes him a great "Rock Front man". Hagar has far more vocal control and musicianship but I am not a fan of him at all.
Roth is more like Mick Jagger for me. Jagger is not a "great" vocalist , either. He is an accomplished showman. He also is a musical genius and I say that because he has the longevity to back it up! Anyway, to stay on "topic", I would vote Roth all the way. I enjoyed VH when they first hit the scene and stopped caring when Roth left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:24:30 PM | |
|
OH? Well, it is just my opinion, man. Really. They just don't do much for me right now. Same with Owens when he was with Priest. That music does NOT sound like Priest to me. Sounds WAY too "modern" and edgy to be Priest. Again, opinion.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:19:45 PM)| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | Damn i hope not, at the show they were on fire man, honestly one of the best shows ive seen. They were talking about putting out a new album with Roth and i hope it goes through. That would rule!!! 20 years later....again with Roth!!! But who knows maybe we can blame it all on Eddie's kid Wolfgang, hahaha. Its all that little basterds fault!!! He was actually a pretty talented bassist for being in his early 20's i think maybe even younger.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! Oh, I do understand. I truly do.
Roth's voice is a big part of VH for me as well. It reminds me of their first couple albums. Eddie is a genius, I know that. He is great. but Roth and his style helped to define VH and they have not been the same without him. In fact, they are not the same WITH him anymore. The special something they had in '78 is gone, from what I have heard.
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | I agree, Sammy could blow away Roth in a singing contest. But I feel Roth is the right man for VH. He's got the act for the show, seeing them live with Roth was the VH i want to see again. By the way DF, i try and let it go, but certian people tend to grind my gears the wrong way, it really cheeses me off when people rip on Halford. He's the Metal God for crying out loud.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | To be very honest, I have never really considered DLR a "great vocalist" at all. I think he is a showman and a TREMENDOUS front man. An entertainer. A "pretty face" (years ago) that the ladies love. Vocally speaking, he is not all that good (as far as I am concerned) but he has that ability to work a crowd that makes him a great "Rock Front man". Hagar has far more vocal control and musicianship but I am not a fan of him at all.
Roth is more like Mick Jagger for me. Jagger is not a "great" vocalist , either. He is an accomplished showman. He also is a musical genius and I say that because he has the longevity to back it up! Anyway, to stay on "topic", I would vote Roth all the way. I enjoyed VH when they first hit the scene and stopped caring when Roth left. |
|
|
|
|
|
| [Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!!] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:19:45 PM | |
|
Damn i hope not, at the show they were on fire man, honestly one of the best shows ive seen. They were talking about putting out a new album with Roth and i hope it goes through. That would rule!!! 20 years later....again with Roth!!! But who knows maybe we can blame it all on Eddie's kid Wolfgang, hahaha. Its all that little basterds fault!!! He was actually a pretty talented bassist for being in his early 20's i think maybe even younger.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:06:54 PM)| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! Oh, I do understand. I truly do.
Roth's voice is a big part of VH for me as well. It reminds me of their first couple albums. Eddie is a genius, I know that. He is great. but Roth and his style helped to define VH and they have not been the same without him. In fact, they are not the same WITH him anymore. The special something they had in '78 is gone, from what I have heard.
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | I agree, Sammy could blow away Roth in a singing contest. But I feel Roth is the right man for VH. He's got the act for the show, seeing them live with Roth was the VH i want to see again. By the way DF, i try and let it go, but certian people tend to grind my gears the wrong way, it really cheeses me off when people rip on Halford. He's the Metal God for crying out loud.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | To be very honest, I have never really considered DLR a "great vocalist" at all. I think he is a showman and a TREMENDOUS front man. An entertainer. A "pretty face" (years ago) that the ladies love. Vocally speaking, he is not all that good (as far as I am concerned) but he has that ability to work a crowd that makes him a great "Rock Front man". Hagar has far more vocal control and musicianship but I am not a fan of him at all.
Roth is more like Mick Jagger for me. Jagger is not a "great" vocalist , either. He is an accomplished showman. He also is a musical genius and I say that because he has the longevity to back it up! Anyway, to stay on "topic", I would vote Roth all the way. I enjoyed VH when they first hit the scene and stopped caring when Roth left. |
|
|
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:06:54 PM | |
|
HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! Oh, I do understand. I truly do.
Roth's voice is a big part of VH for me as well. It reminds me of their first couple albums. Eddie is a genius, I know that. He is great. but Roth and his style helped to define VH and they have not been the same without him. In fact, they are not the same WITH him anymore. The special something they had in '78 is gone, from what I have heard.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:01:48 PM)| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | I agree, Sammy could blow away Roth in a singing contest. But I feel Roth is the right man for VH. He's got the act for the show, seeing them live with Roth was the VH i want to see again. By the way DF, i try and let it go, but certian people tend to grind my gears the wrong way, it really cheeses me off when people rip on Halford. He's the Metal God for crying out loud.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | To be very honest, I have never really considered DLR a "great vocalist" at all. I think he is a showman and a TREMENDOUS front man. An entertainer. A "pretty face" (years ago) that the ladies love. Vocally speaking, he is not all that good (as far as I am concerned) but he has that ability to work a crowd that makes him a great "Rock Front man". Hagar has far more vocal control and musicianship but I am not a fan of him at all.
Roth is more like Mick Jagger for me. Jagger is not a "great" vocalist , either. He is an accomplished showman. He also is a musical genius and I say that because he has the longevity to back it up! Anyway, to stay on "topic", I would vote Roth all the way. I enjoyed VH when they first hit the scene and stopped caring when Roth left. |
|
|
|
| [Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!!] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:01:48 PM | |
|
I agree, Sammy could blow away Roth in a singing contest. But I feel Roth is the right man for VH. He's got the act for the show, seeing them live with Roth was the VH i want to see again. By the way DF, i try and let it go, but certian people tend to grind my gears the wrong way, it really cheeses me off when people rip on Halford. He's the Metal God for crying out loud.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:53:11 PM)| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | To be very honest, I have never really considered DLR a "great vocalist" at all. I think he is a showman and a TREMENDOUS front man. An entertainer. A "pretty face" (years ago) that the ladies love. Vocally speaking, he is not all that good (as far as I am concerned) but he has that ability to work a crowd that makes him a great "Rock Front man". Hagar has far more vocal control and musicianship but I am not a fan of him at all.
Roth is more like Mick Jagger for me. Jagger is not a "great" vocalist , either. He is an accomplished showman. He also is a musical genius and I say that because he has the longevity to back it up! Anyway, to stay on "topic", I would vote Roth all the way. I enjoyed VH when they first hit the scene and stopped caring when Roth left. |
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:53:11 PM | |
|
To be very honest, I have never really considered DLR a "great vocalist" at all. I think he is a showman and a TREMENDOUS front man. An entertainer. A "pretty face" (years ago) that the ladies love. Vocally speaking, he is not all that good (as far as I am concerned) but he has that ability to work a crowd that makes him a great "Rock Front man". Hagar has far more vocal control and musicianship but I am not a fan of him at all.
Roth is more like Mick Jagger for me. Jagger is not a "great" vocalist , either. He is an accomplished showman. He also is a musical genius and I say that because he has the longevity to back it up! Anyway, to stay on "topic", I would vote Roth all the way. I enjoyed VH when they first hit the scene and stopped caring when Roth left. |
|
| [Deep Freeze] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:46:02 PM | |
|
HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yeah well, if it makes you feel any better, the ALL do it for attention and nothing else. Don't let it get to you, bro!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:44:18 PM)| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | Thanks DF, some guys arent happy unless you beat what you meant into their brains, like a certian member who has a hate on for Halford.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | Well dime, SOME guys have made a "career" out of it here!!! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No sweat, man! I knew what you meant!!!!
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | | Buddy get over yourself, im just saying that IMO (DO YOU KNOW WHAT IMO MEANS??.....IN MY OPINION) DLR is a better Vocalist than Hagar. The ORINGINAL line up was with David Lee Roth so in saying that, he was a part of their original sound. They became more popish with Hagar. I like i few songs with hagar but i like the older stuff better. You don't agree with me then fine thats your opinion, but your not calling me out on shit, your going to call someone out on their opinion? Everyone has different opinions on here man, you'll notice that after you 20th post, so either accept it or maybe find a new website, you wont last on here "calling people out" |
|
|
|
|
| [J.D. DIAMOND] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:45:39 PM | |
|
| I hate Van Halen,and Sammy Hagar,don't like either bands or vocalists. But I would have to go with David Lee Roth as being the better vocalist,and better persona for the band "Van Halen". |
|
| [Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!!] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:44:18 PM | |
|
Thanks DF, some guys arent happy unless you beat what you meant into their brains, like a certian member who has a hate on for Halford.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:38:53 PM)| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | Well dime, SOME guys have made a "career" out of it here!!! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No sweat, man! I knew what you meant!!!!
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | | Buddy get over yourself, im just saying that IMO (DO YOU KNOW WHAT IMO MEANS??.....IN MY OPINION) DLR is a better Vocalist than Hagar. The ORINGINAL line up was with David Lee Roth so in saying that, he was a part of their original sound. They became more popish with Hagar. I like i few songs with hagar but i like the older stuff better. You don't agree with me then fine thats your opinion, but your not calling me out on shit, your going to call someone out on their opinion? Everyone has different opinions on here man, you'll notice that after you 20th post, so either accept it or maybe find a new website, you wont last on here "calling people out" |
|
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:38:53 PM | |
|
Well dime, SOME guys have made a "career" out of it here!!! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No sweat, man! I knew what you meant!!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:32:21 PM)| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | | Buddy get over yourself, im just saying that IMO (DO YOU KNOW WHAT IMO MEANS??.....IN MY OPINION) DLR is a better Vocalist than Hagar. The ORINGINAL line up was with David Lee Roth so in saying that, he was a part of their original sound. They became more popish with Hagar. I like i few songs with hagar but i like the older stuff better. You don't agree with me then fine thats your opinion, but your not calling me out on shit, your going to call someone out on their opinion? Everyone has different opinions on here man, you'll notice that after you 20th post, so either accept it or maybe find a new website, you wont last on here "calling people out" |
|
|
| [Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!!] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 4:32:21 PM | |
|
| Buddy get over yourself, im just saying that IMO (DO YOU KNOW WHAT IMO MEANS??.....IN MY OPINION) DLR is a better Vocalist than Hagar. The ORINGINAL line up was with David Lee Roth so in saying that, he was a part of their original sound. They became more popish with Hagar. I like i few songs with hagar but i like the older stuff better. You don't agree with me then fine thats your opinion, but your not calling me out on shit, your going to call someone out on their opinion? Everyone has different opinions on here man, you'll notice that after you 20th post, so either accept it or maybe find a new website, you wont last on here "calling people out" |
|
| [Phantom A6] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:12:56 PM | |
|
Just you don't want it!! 
Better antics than your fricken stuff!! 
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Diamond Jim from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:09:16 AM)| | | Diamond Jim wrote: | |  No one wants to discuss your silly antics. LOL!
| | | Phantom A6 wrote: | | Darryn, no-one wants to discuss with you!!
(Quoting Message by Diamond Jim from Monday, June 15, 2009 8:47:45 PM)
| |
|
Diamond Jim wrote: |
| |
"He made up their original sound"
Please explain your statement. How did Roth make up the original Van Halen sound?
| |
|
Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: |
| |
| Damn straight!!! Nobody sounds like david lee roth, no one. He has an original voice, I can tell you everytime i hear him singing i can tell its him. Hagar i have to listen for a minute, or maybe even 2, he sounds alot like other singers. Roth has that squeal, that sound, thats completly his own. |
|
Edited at: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 6:19:18 AM |
|
|
|
| [british.steel] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 10:27:26 AM | |
|
| DJ very very well put. I couldnt have said it better myself...u cant just stick anyother guitar player up there, with no eddie, there is no van halen. i just wish he would get his cool EVH Frankenstine guitar back! |
|
| [Diamond Jim] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:09:16 AM | |
|
No one wants to discuss your silly antics. LOL!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Phantom A6 from Tuesday, June 16, 2009 6:18:57 AM)| | | Phantom A6 wrote: | | Darryn, no-one wants to discuss with you!!
(Quoting Message by Diamond Jim from Monday, June 15, 2009 8:47:45 PM)
| |
|
Diamond Jim wrote: |
| |
"He made up their original sound"
Please explain your statement. How did Roth make up the original Van Halen sound?
| |
|
Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: |
| |
| Damn straight!!! Nobody sounds like david lee roth, no one. He has an original voice, I can tell you everytime i hear him singing i can tell its him. Hagar i have to listen for a minute, or maybe even 2, he sounds alot like other singers. Roth has that squeal, that sound, thats completly his own. |
|
Edited at: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 6:19:18 AM |
|
|
| [Diamond Jim] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:04:47 AM | |
|
Sorry man but I have to call you out on this one. Eddie Van Halen is the most influential and original guitar player of the last 30 years and you say David Lee Roth is Van Halen. I don't think so. Eddie Van Halen is the sound and always will be. Yeah Roth is part of the original sound but they continued on just fine with Sammy Hagar. You can replace Roth but Eddie can never be replaced.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! from Monday, June 15, 2009 8:55:26 PM)| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | Eddie called it that Las Vegas sound, im not really sure how to explain it fully, but it was that fun, exciting jump around sound. Sammy hagar's albums were it seemed just more laid back. Not as exciting, David lee roth threw the element of unpredictablity in there, alot more original, IMO.
| | | Diamond Jim wrote: | | "He made up their original sound"
Please explain your statement. How did Roth make up the original Van Halen sound?
| | | Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: | | | Damn straight!!! Nobody sounds like david lee roth, no one. He has an original voice, I can tell you everytime i hear him singing i can tell its him. Hagar i have to listen for a minute, or maybe even 2, he sounds alot like other singers. Roth has that squeal, that sound, thats completly his own. |
|
|
|
|
| [pip] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:54:54 AM | |
|
VH1 IS HAVING A SHOW CALLED THE GREAT DEBATE STARTING JULY 6TH I BELIEVE
ONE OF THE TOPICS IF ROTH VS HAGAR --THERE'S OTHER DEBATES BUT THAT'S THE ONE THAT STICKS OUT IN MY MIND--WILL DEFINITELY HAVE TO CHECK IT OUT !! |
|
| [Phantom A6] Tuesday, June 16, 2009 6:18:57 AM | |
|
Darryn, no-one wants to discuss with you!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Diamond Jim from Monday, June 15, 2009 8:47:45 PM)
| |
|
Diamond Jim wrote: |
| |
"He made up their original sound"
Please explain your statement. How did Roth make up the original Van Halen sound?
| |
|
Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!! wrote: |
| |
| Damn straight!!! Nobody sounds like david lee roth, no one. He has an original voice, I can tell you everytime i hear him singing i can tell its him. Hagar i have to listen for a minute, or maybe even 2, he sounds alot like other singers. Roth has that squeal, that sound, thats completly his own. |
|
Edited at: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 6:19:18 AM |
|
| [Dime/UNDER BLOOD RED SKIES!!!!] Monday, June 15, 2009 9:13:38 PM | |
|
Excatly!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by spapad from Monday, June 15, 2009 9:02:49 PM)| | | spapad wrote: | | I think DLR has an unmistakeable sound, and is a showman who always pleases the fans. That is why I find him to be the one that Should be leading VH.
Like I said long ago on this thread. VH without Dave is like JP without Rob. Just Not the same. |
|
|
