| [Head banger] Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:23:22 AM | |
|
currently pissing me off.
wind
work
|
|
| [Head banger] Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:21:58 AM | |
|
you will webcast this too me? my fee including travel may bankrupt you. as an expert, my opinion is quite expensive. capitalism you know.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:25:46 AM)| |  | _strat_ wrote: | | Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
| [Head banger] Thursday, March 05, 2009 7:25:32 AM | |
|
apparently thats comon in asia. also butock implants????
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:15:18 PM)| | | spapad wrote: | | | Oh yuck, Ladies could you imagine going out with a guy and finding out he had Pec implants! ........NO!!! Gross! |
|
|
| [Return_of_Darth_Painkiller_0870] Thursday, March 05, 2009 5:30:18 AM | |
|
| And where is Deep Duck? He's usually on by now. |
|
| [_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:23:22 AM | |
|
A bewitched log? You think if a princess gives him a kiss that he will then turn into a duck/swan?
We should perform the experiment with and without the pool cover, and compare the results.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:18:48 AM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | HAAAAA!!!! A SWAN!!?? I would guess a log to be more accurate were he to actually float. A bewitched log at that.
My money is still on him dropping like a stone off my diving board. Granted, I have no children so should not expect to have my children's children affected much but, hey, I just want to kick the guy into my pool for a laugh (er, um...I mean "experiment")! I may or may not take off the pool cover.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Now, now, no more about bets. This is a serious scientific experiment.
The duck possibility has to be considered. Also, he could be a swan, or just a log. In any case, we have to take into consideration his overall body density, and compare it to that of water, because that determines wheter or not he will float. But, enough theory, we need to try it out for real. He wont like it, Im sure, but hey... Sacrifices are neccesary when it comes to such scientific breakthroughs as this one. The future of our children, and our childrens children may well depend on wheter Freeze will float or sink.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
In any case... What if he doesnt float?
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Ah, Freeze doesn't frighten me....little girlie-man.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:18:48 AM | |
|
HAAAAA!!!! A SWAN!!?? I would guess a log to be more accurate were he to actually float. A bewitched log at that.
My money is still on him dropping like a stone off my diving board. Granted, I have no children so should not expect to have my children's children affected much but, hey, I just want to kick the guy into my pool for a laugh (er, um...I mean "experiment")! I may or may not take off the pool cover.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:06:59 AM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Now, now, no more about bets. This is a serious scientific experiment.
The duck possibility has to be considered. Also, he could be a swan, or just a log. In any case, we have to take into consideration his overall body density, and compare it to that of water, because that determines wheter or not he will float. But, enough theory, we need to try it out for real. He wont like it, Im sure, but hey... Sacrifices are neccesary when it comes to such scientific breakthroughs as this one. The future of our children, and our childrens children may well depend on wheter Freeze will float or sink.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
In any case... What if he doesnt float?
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Ah, Freeze doesn't frighten me....little girlie-man.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:06:59 AM | |
|
Now, now, no more about bets. This is a serious scientific experiment.
The duck possibility has to be considered. Also, he could be a swan, or just a log. In any case, we have to take into consideration his overall body density, and compare it to that of water, because that determines wheter or not he will float. But, enough theory, we need to try it out for real. He wont like it, Im sure, but hey... Sacrifices are neccesary when it comes to such scientific breakthroughs as this one. The future of our children, and our childrens children may well depend on wheter Freeze will float or sink.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:57:33 AM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
In any case... What if he doesnt float?
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Ah, Freeze doesn't frighten me....little girlie-man.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM |
|
|
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:57:33 AM | |
|
You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:48:29 AM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
In any case... What if he doesnt float?
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Ah, Freeze doesn't frighten me....little girlie-man.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM |
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:48:29 AM | |
|
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:45:26 AM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
In any case... What if he doesnt float?
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Ah, Freeze doesn't frighten me....little girlie-man.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM |
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:45:26 AM | |
|
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
In any case... What if he doesnt float?
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Ah, Freeze doesn't frighten me....little girlie-man.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM |
|
| [_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM | |
|
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
In any case... What if he doesnt float?
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:26:36 AM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | Ah, Freeze doesn't frighten me....little girlie-man.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:26:36 AM | |
|
Ah, Freeze doesn't frighten me....little girlie-man.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:05:51 AM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:05:51 AM | |
|
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:42:39 AM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:42:39 AM | |
|
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:25:46 AM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:25:46 AM | |
|
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:12:51 AM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:12:51 AM | |
|
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
| |
|
_strat_ wrote: |
| |
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
| |
|
Deep Freeze wrote: |
| |
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| |
|
guidogodoy wrote: |
| |
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM |
|
| [_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM | |
|
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM)| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | | Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
|
| [spapad] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:17:11 PM | |
|
Bye Bev, bye DF!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:16:00 PM)| | | Bev wrote: | | LOL ... In that case, I think the football players woulda had half a chance if they had Bev along!
I'm off 'til later as well. Thanks for the laughs, gang! Cheers
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | | Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:16:00 PM | |
|
LOL ... In that case, I think the football players woulda had half a chance if they had Bev along!
I'm off 'til later as well. Thanks for the laughs, gang! Cheers
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM)| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | | Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
|
| [spapad] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:15:18 PM | |
|
| Oh yuck, Ladies could you imagine going out with a guy and finding out he had Pec implants! ........NO!!! Gross! |
|
| [spapad] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM | |
|
Yeah right! I guess all she wanted for Christmas was a sexy bra for Gramps! LOL
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:02 PM)| | | Bev wrote: | | That's me, spa!!!
| | | spapad wrote: | | Hey!............What's going on!? ..............Who posted My Mother!!!
 |
|
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM | |
|
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:07:56 PM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | | Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:02 PM | |
|
That's me, spa!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:11:52 PM)| | | spapad wrote: | | Hey!............What's going on!? ..............Who posted My Mother!!!
|
|
|
| [spapad] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:11:52 PM | |
|
Hey!............What's going on!? ..............Who posted My Mother!!!
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:08:00 PM | |
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:07:56 PM | |
|
| Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs. |
|
| [~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:07:15 PM | |
|
|
| [~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:02:06 PM | |
|
lmao guido
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:57:39 PM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | NO!!!! Personally, I am disgusted by them. If I wanted a barbie doll, I'd buy one.
Plus, a grandma with DDs is just plain and wrong.
| | | Bev wrote: | | God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ...  I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!! 
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me  All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:00:13 PM | |
|
LOL
... you guys stop makin' me cry; I'm half way to grandma ((sniff, sniff))
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:57:39 PM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | NO!!!! Personally, I am disgusted by them. If I wanted a barbie doll, I'd buy one.
Plus, a grandma with DDs is just plain and wrong.
| | | Bev wrote: | | God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:59:03 PM | |
|
 ... stop teasing (ah, take me back a few years) 
Night
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:56:53 PM)| | | Head banger wrote: | | perhaps my next job????
Night all.
behave.
| | | Bev wrote: | | ... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
 BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
| | | Bev wrote: | | God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:57:39 PM | |
|
NO!!!! Personally, I am disgusted by them. If I wanted a barbie doll, I'd buy one.
Plus, a grandma with DDs is just plain and wrong.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:49:06 PM)| | | Bev wrote: | | God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:56:53 PM | |
|
perhaps my next job????
Night all.
behave.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:54:45 PM)| | | Bev wrote: | | ... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
| | | Bev wrote: | | God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:55:51 PM | |
|
BWWWWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:51:29 PM)| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
| | | Bev wrote: | | God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:55:33 PM | |
|
lmao exactly..
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:54:45 PM)| | | Bev wrote: | | ... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
| | | Bev wrote: | | God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:55:08 PM | |
|
its just a word, could have used prostitution, but spelling and typing....
yeah, he would.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:41:49 PM)| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:54:45 PM | |
|
... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:51:29 PM)| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
| | | Bev wrote: | | God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:51:29 PM | |
|
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:49:06 PM)| | | Bev wrote: | | God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:49:06 PM | |
|
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:43:36 PM)| | | MG_Metalgoddess wrote: | | LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:43:36 PM | |
|
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:41:49 PM)| | | Bev wrote: | | You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:41:49 PM | |
|
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM)| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:26:47 PM | |
|
HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:39:42 PM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Freeze, George Carlin just called from up there (yes, there is "up there" and hes feeling like a total jerk). He wants his royalties, or else Joe Pesci will come round your place with a baseball bat.
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
| [Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:40:58 PM | |
|
no, since its not popular, the cause can continue for years.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:19:55 PM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | You really did it? A pro government stance? First Freeze, now you... Next thing will be me saying that capitalism isnt so bad after all...
And sex isnt something I would rally against, if thats what you mean.
| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:19:55 PM | |
|
You really did it? A pro government stance? First Freeze, now you... Next thing will be me saying that capitalism isnt so bad after all...
And sex isnt something I would rally against, if thats what you mean.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM)| | | Head banger wrote: | | LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM | |
|
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:05 PM)| | | Bev wrote: | | Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:39 PM | |
|
No, Im suggesting that the solution to the AIDS problem is less pleasant than solutions to other problems.
As for prostitution, I agree. I think that the Dutch have it the right way.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM)| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:05 PM | |
|
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM)| | | Head banger wrote: | | your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
| [Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM | |
|
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:57 PM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:39:42 PM | |
|
Freeze, George Carlin just called from up there (yes, there is "up there" and hes feeling like a total jerk). He wants his royalties, or else Joe Pesci will come round your place with a baseball bat.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
| [_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:57 PM | |
|
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:31:49 PM)| | | Head banger wrote: | | its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
| [Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:54 PM | |
|
Can you imagine how many meals all the money johns spend on hookers could buy?
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by METAL MELTDOWN from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:31:51 PM)| | | METAL MELTDOWN wrote: | | My heart is not bleeding for the children abroad but for the children on our neck of the forest but I think it could be that a child cannot fend for itself where as the 20 something hooker can...
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other?????????? |
|
|
|
